<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Miranda and the Supreme Court</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jonathanturley.org/2007/08/18/miranda-and-the-supreme-court/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jonathanturley.org/2007/08/18/miranda-and-the-supreme-court/</link>
	<description>Res ipsa loquitur (&#34;The thing itself speaks&#34;)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 03:51:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nowak Case Presents Classic Elements of 5th Amendment Violations &#171; JONATHAN TURLEY</title>
		<link>http://jonathanturley.org/2007/08/18/miranda-and-the-supreme-court/#comment-749</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nowak Case Presents Classic Elements of 5th Amendment Violations &#171; JONATHAN TURLEY]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Nov 2007 11:36:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonathanturley.wordpress.com/2007/08/18/miranda-and-the-supreme-court/#comment-749</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] It is increasingly rare to see such major Miranda driven decisions or a court willing to protect the underlying principles of that decision. As shown with Sen. Craig, there continue to be the use of threats and mmisrepresentations (both allowed by the Supreme Court) to secure confessions. The invocation of rights under Miranda are the critical protection at this early encounter with police. Miranda has been gradually weakened over the years do to exceptions created by the Court. For a column on that evolution, click here [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] It is increasingly rare to see such major Miranda driven decisions or a court willing to protect the underlying principles of that decision. As shown with Sen. Craig, there continue to be the use of threats and mmisrepresentations (both allowed by the Supreme Court) to secure confessions. The invocation of rights under Miranda are the critical protection at this early encounter with police. Miranda has been gradually weakened over the years do to exceptions created by the Court. For a column on that evolution, click here [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

