Senate To Move Forward with Ethics Investigation of Craig

Sen. Craig’s attorney has tried and failed to get the Senate to drop its planned investigation into his guilty plea. Stan Brand has a good point that this is not the type of matter that has been historically investigated. Disorderly conduct is an extremely minor offense and the matter does not relate to his senatorial duties. However, the Senate rules are quite broad and reserves the right to investigate any “improper conduct which may reflect upon the Senate.” Historically, however, this matter would not be subject to such review. There are few cases of actual expulsion or even censure in its history. Senator William Blount of Tennessee was expelled on the basis of evidence that he incited native americans to go to war against the United States. Even Joseph McCarthy was only censured after his reign of terror against accused communists.

3 Responses to “Senate To Move Forward with Ethics Investigation of Craig”


  1. 1 Dover 1, September 6, 2007 at 12:37 pm

    “Improper conduct which may reflect upon the Senate” is serious stuff, and I agree: behavior matters.

    We can’t have gayish behavior in the Senate, for God’s sake!

    The Senate needs to put this guy in cement shoes and drop him to the bottom of the Morality Sea.

    And then, in celebration, I suggest all the good Senators go out and buy themselves All-American Vitter-type whores, in celebration of their indignation over queer behavior (dignified golf applause).

  2. 2 gilpo 1, September 6, 2007 at 4:30 pm

    Article 1, Section 6 of the US Constitution states that “Senators and Representatives. shall. be privileged from arrest during their attendance at the session of their respective Houses, and in going to and returning from the same.”

    Since the senator was on his way to Washington, and did in fact cast a vote on the evening of the day on which he was arrested, his arrest and subsequent questioning were, technically speaking, unconstitutional.

  3. 3 jonathanturley 1, September 7, 2007 at 5:04 pm

    The Supreme Court has taken a more narrow view of the meaning of Article 1, Section 6, which excludes certain crimes. State courts have also rejected such claims based on like provisions in their respective constitutions.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

Gravatar
WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s




Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Turley Tweets

Click here to follow the blog on Twitter.

SELECTED AS TOP LEGAL OPINION BLOG (2011)

SELECTED AS TOP LEGAL THEORY AND LAW PROFESSOR BLOG (2008)

blawg100_2008_winner9349c7

Winner — Top Opinion Writer By Aspen Institute and The Week Magazine for Best Single-Issue Advocacy (Civil Liberties)

Categories

Archives


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 602 other followers