The House surveillance bill is now complete. It does not force the government to satisfy the Fourth Amendment on surveillance of citizens and allows for a relatively weak level of review — albeit more review than President Bush will accept. It is an improvement over the current system, but there was no debate of actually using the constitutional process laid out by the Framers. The Democrats are still saying that they may give telecommunications companies retroactive immunity if they tell them more about what they did. Once again the question is why. These companies like any citizens should be responsible for their decisions and any betrayal of their customers. As usual, the House bill is stronger than the Senate bill, which will likely give immunity to the companies who are huge political contributors to Senators and their parties. What is particularly astonishing is that both houses are compromising, even in the face of the White House ordering companies and officials not to share critical information with oversight committees.

VOTED THE #1 LEGAL THEORY AND LAW PROFESSOR BLOG OF THE TOP 100 LEGAL BLOGS BY THE ABA JOURNAL

c
Top Posts
- Client Fires Orly Taitz and Threatens Bar Complaint Against Her As Judge Explores Sanctions
- Hunter Kills College Student and Wounds Another in Hunting Accident
- A Sign of the Times: Colorado Billboard Proclaims the Lunacy Taking Hold in America
- Bishop Bars Kennedy From Communion Due To Votes on Abortion
- Kick-Off: Man Kicks Dog To Death To Watch Steelers Game
- Meet Burka Barbie: Save the Children and Mattel Support Auction with Barbie in Full Burka
- Obama: Tibet Is Part of China
- Breach Birth: Arizona Deputies Allegedly Force Woman to Give Birth in Shackles and Refuse to Allow Her to Hold Baby
- Walk, Don't Run: English Police Blow Up Car After Spotting Motorist Running For Boat
- Iranian Interrogators Use Daily Show Segment As Proof of Espionage Against Journalist
Recent Posts
- Motion to the Court: Kansas Man Charged With Threatening Judge and Witness
- Kentucky Court Reduces But Upholds Punitive Award Against McDonald’s In Prank Rape Case
- One Thumb Down, Very Down: Vatican Says New Moon is a Must Miss
- Walk, Don’t Run: English Police Blow Up Car After Spotting Motorist Running For Boat
- Pennsylvania Man Dies After Hit By Multiple Tasers
Recent Comments
| Former Federal LEO on A Sign of the Times: Colorado … | |
| Simone Benedict on A Sign of the Times: Colorado … | |
| maverratick on Kentucky Court Reduces But Uph… | |
| Vince Treacy on One Thumb Down, Very Down: Vat… | |
| Byron on A Sign of the Times: Colorado … | |
| Anonymously Yours on A Sign of the Times: Colorado … | |
| Byron on Kentucky Court Reduces But Uph… | |
| Byron on Kentucky Court Reduces But Uph… | |
| evrenseven on Lost in Translation: Turkish A… | |
| Byron on A Sign of the Times: Colorado … | |
| Paully on Client Fires Orly Taitz and Th… | |
| TomD.Arch on Kentucky Court Reduces But Uph… | |
| john galt on A Sign of the Times: Colorado … | |
| john galt on Kentucky Court Reduces But Uph… | |
| TomD.Arch on Walk, Don’t Run: English… |
Archives
- November 2009 (159)
- October 2009 (205)
- September 2009 (186)
- August 2009 (176)
- July 2009 (181)
- June 2009 (169)
- May 2009 (190)
- April 2009 (187)
- March 2009 (184)
- February 2009 (192)
- January 2009 (193)
- December 2008 (165)
- November 2008 (177)
- October 2008 (149)
- September 2008 (121)
- August 2008 (157)
- July 2008 (182)
- June 2008 (139)
- May 2008 (154)
- April 2008 (146)
- March 2008 (166)
- February 2008 (124)
- January 2008 (108)
- December 2007 (168)
- November 2007 (162)
- October 2007 (130)
- September 2007 (109)
- August 2007 (194)
0 Responses to “Congress Holds Out Promise of Retroactive Immunity for Telecoms”