Comments on: Megan Meier Case: A Test Case for the Crime of Internet Annoyance? http://jonathanturley.org/2007/11/19/megan-meier-case-a-test-case-for-the-crime-of-internet-annoyance/ Res ipsa loquitur ("The thing itself speaks") Tue, 24 Nov 2009 12:28:36 +0000 http://wordpress.com/ hourly 1 By: Caitlyn http://jonathanturley.org/2007/11/19/megan-meier-case-a-test-case-for-the-crime-of-internet-annoyance/#comment-59646 Caitlyn Thu, 04 Jun 2009 01:30:17 +0000 http://jonathanturley.org/2007/11/19/megan-meier-case-a-test-case-for-the-crime-of-internet-annoyance/#comment-59646 Man,Im waching a show on t.v about this case.It turns out that she was depressed,So am i.Its hard to have people making you feel down,Expecial when its an adult.No one should ever do what "Drew"Did.She should be arrested,And put to death.She WAS involved in Megans suicide.She knew about the account,And what was going on.Meny people have been arrested for knowing about a murder,Or the suicide...And have either been put to death,Or prison for life.She should be put on tril,And grilled by all people who have been bullied over the internet. Man,Im waching a show on t.v about this case.It turns out that she was depressed,So am i.Its hard to have people making you feel down,Expecial when its an adult.No one should ever do what “Drew”Did.She should be arrested,And put to death.She WAS involved in Megans suicide.She knew about the account,And what was going on.Meny people have been arrested for knowing about a murder,Or the suicide…And have either been put to death,Or prison for life.She should be put on tril,And grilled by all people who have been bullied over the internet.

]]> By: Ana http://jonathanturley.org/2007/11/19/megan-meier-case-a-test-case-for-the-crime-of-internet-annoyance/#comment-38024 Ana Fri, 06 Feb 2009 02:47:43 +0000 http://jonathanturley.org/2007/11/19/megan-meier-case-a-test-case-for-the-crime-of-internet-annoyance/#comment-38024 I agree with Ryan. Alot of people do this type of stuff on a daily basis. They harass each other and do things a whole lot worse. However, she should definently be held against all this because she's an older woman. Those are kids who hurt kids. An adult hurting a kid is just not right. And, this was all because Lori's silent and shallow daughter couldn't handle someone talking about her, when she probably does the same thing to other people. I agree with Ryan. Alot of people do this type of stuff on a daily basis. They harass each other and do things a whole lot worse. However, she should definently be held against all this because she’s an older woman. Those are kids who hurt kids. An adult hurting a kid is just not right. And, this was all because Lori’s silent and shallow daughter couldn’t handle someone talking about her, when she probably does the same thing to other people.

]]> By: Ryan http://jonathanturley.org/2007/11/19/megan-meier-case-a-test-case-for-the-crime-of-internet-annoyance/#comment-13480 Ryan Sun, 18 May 2008 15:23:04 +0000 http://jonathanturley.org/2007/11/19/megan-meier-case-a-test-case-for-the-crime-of-internet-annoyance/#comment-13480 Ms. Drew is not a good person, but what she did happens everyday in schools. How can you hold her to higher standard because she used her computer to harass a student when students are doing much worse to each other everyday. Ms. Drew is not a good person, but what she did happens everyday in schools. How can you hold her to higher standard because she used her computer to harass a student when students are doing much worse to each other everyday.

]]> By: Hypatia http://jonathanturley.org/2007/11/19/megan-meier-case-a-test-case-for-the-crime-of-internet-annoyance/#comment-2334 Hypatia Sun, 25 Nov 2007 21:26:39 +0000 http://jonathanturley.org/2007/11/19/megan-meier-case-a-test-case-for-the-crime-of-internet-annoyance/#comment-2334 Lori Drew is a psychopath. That part is clear. But more disturbing than that are the actions of authorities: If it had been an adult MALE that "carried on" in a sexually explicit way with a 13 year old girl, even if it WERE for the purposes of revenge for his teen daughter, he'd be locked up as a pedophile. Second, there are al-READY laws on the books that cover this type of harassment. For chrissake: just implement them! What is particularly chilling to me, is that Lori Drew knew that the victim was known to be suicidal in the past. That means that her statement to her that the "world would be better off without you" or whatever it was... is even MORE chilling: it means she was TRYING to steer this girl to suicide. It means she had a desire to push it in that direction, and did so. Reminds me of Charles Manson. He never "technically" put his own hands upon his victims either, but he "made it happen" by manipulating people, I mean that's the premise upon which he was convicted: that he had INCITED it. Same thing here. Lori Drew incited this suicide and should be just as responsible as Manson was when he incited those murders---and she should also be treated just like any other adult who engages in online relationships of a sexual nature with under-aged children. Lori Drew is a psychopath. That part is clear.

But more disturbing than that are the actions of authorities: If it had been an adult MALE that “carried on” in a sexually explicit way with a 13 year old girl, even if it WERE for the purposes of revenge for his teen daughter, he’d be locked up as a pedophile.

Second, there are al-READY laws on the books that cover this type of harassment. For chrissake: just implement them!

What is particularly chilling to me, is that Lori Drew knew that the victim was known to be suicidal in the past. That means that her statement to her that the “world would be better off without you” or whatever it was… is even MORE chilling: it means she was TRYING to steer this girl to suicide. It means she had a desire to push it in that direction, and did so.

Reminds me of Charles Manson. He never “technically” put his own hands upon his victims either, but he “made it happen” by manipulating people, I mean that’s the premise upon which he was convicted: that he had INCITED it.

Same thing here. Lori Drew incited this suicide and should be just as responsible as Manson was when he incited those murders—and she should also be treated just like any other adult who engages in online relationships of a sexual nature with under-aged children.

]]> By: dancnkc http://jonathanturley.org/2007/11/19/megan-meier-case-a-test-case-for-the-crime-of-internet-annoyance/#comment-2183 dancnkc Wed, 21 Nov 2007 05:19:57 +0000 http://jonathanturley.org/2007/11/19/megan-meier-case-a-test-case-for-the-crime-of-internet-annoyance/#comment-2183 Ms. Drew played directly on the sensitivities she knew would cause maximum damage to the Megan. Ms. Drew lured Megan in a way she knew would be most devastating to the child. This wicked MOA Drew used is the exact methodology that a child predator employs to bait, lure and reel a child victim into doing their will. Child grooming was utilized over weeks and weeks to gain the child's trust... and once trust was obtained, she exploited it into a relationship. (Another Child Predator Hallmark). When Ms. Drew saw her bullets were hitting it's mark, she turned up the heat. She invited others to partake in the sick, twisted mental assault on this child, keeping the pressure up. Even her business employee joined in the game. Ms. Drew then delivered the final blow that many depressed 13 year old girls would crumble under. She mentally raped the child and left her for dead. Better said, encouraged her for dead. Ms. Drew remains smug and defiant about her actions - even seeks to attack this grieving family while their beloved daughter's memory is fresh in their mind. She has committed the unthinkable.... and doesn't even acknowledge she abused this child. Child Predators go to jail for their actions. Physical contact is not required for a conviction. Evidence of any kind of sexually charged grooming of a child by an adult is worthy of a charge of indecent liberties with a child.... or at the very least harassment. If even assisted suicide is criminal intent, driving someone to it should at least qualify as something more heinous than an ordinary parking ticket. Danny Vice http://weeklyvice.blogspot.com/ Ms. Drew played directly on the sensitivities she knew would cause maximum damage to the Megan. Ms. Drew lured Megan in a way she knew would be most devastating to the child.

This wicked MOA Drew used is the exact methodology that a child predator employs to bait, lure and reel a child victim into doing their will. Child grooming was utilized over weeks and weeks to gain the child’s trust… and once trust was obtained, she exploited it into a relationship. (Another Child Predator Hallmark).

When Ms. Drew saw her bullets were hitting it’s mark, she turned up the heat. She invited others to partake in the sick, twisted mental assault on this child, keeping the pressure up. Even her business employee joined in the game.

Ms. Drew then delivered the final blow that many depressed 13 year old girls would crumble under.

She mentally raped the child and left her for dead. Better said, encouraged her for dead.

Ms. Drew remains smug and defiant about her actions – even seeks to attack this grieving family while their beloved daughter’s memory is fresh in their mind.

She has committed the unthinkable…. and doesn’t even acknowledge she abused this child.

Child Predators go to jail for their actions. Physical contact is not required for a conviction. Evidence of any kind of sexually charged grooming of a child by an adult is worthy of a charge of indecent liberties with a child…. or at the very least harassment.

If even assisted suicide is criminal intent, driving someone to it should at least qualify as something more heinous than an ordinary parking ticket.

Danny Vice
http://weeklyvice.blogspot.com/

]]>