<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Iowa Prison Program that Saves Prisoner &#8220;Pagans&#8221; is Ruled Unconstitutional</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jonathanturley.org/2007/12/04/iowa-prison-program-that-saves-prisoner-pagans-is-ruled-unconstitutional/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jonathanturley.org/2007/12/04/iowa-prison-program-that-saves-prisoner-pagans-is-ruled-unconstitutional/</link>
	<description>Res ipsa loquitur (&#34;The thing itself speaks&#34;)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 04:47:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: deeply worried</title>
		<link>http://jonathanturley.org/2007/12/04/iowa-prison-program-that-saves-prisoner-pagans-is-ruled-unconstitutional/#comment-2658</link>
		<dc:creator>deeply worried</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2007 03:18:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonathanturley.org/2007/12/04/iowa-prison-program-that-saves-prisoner-pagans-is-ruled-unconstitutional/#comment-2658</guid>
		<description>No argument there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No argument there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Commoner</title>
		<link>http://jonathanturley.org/2007/12/04/iowa-prison-program-that-saves-prisoner-pagans-is-ruled-unconstitutional/#comment-2654</link>
		<dc:creator>Commoner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2007 01:31:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonathanturley.org/2007/12/04/iowa-prison-program-that-saves-prisoner-pagans-is-ruled-unconstitutional/#comment-2654</guid>
		<description>Sorry deeply worried, I was multi tasking in the blogosphere and thought I was responting to Patty. I don&#039;t beleive that this church is interested in the prisoner&#039;s welfare as much as they are interested in claiming their souls for Jesus.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry deeply worried, I was multi tasking in the blogosphere and thought I was responting to Patty. I don&#8217;t beleive that this church is interested in the prisoner&#8217;s welfare as much as they are interested in claiming their souls for Jesus.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: deeply worried</title>
		<link>http://jonathanturley.org/2007/12/04/iowa-prison-program-that-saves-prisoner-pagans-is-ruled-unconstitutional/#comment-2648</link>
		<dc:creator>deeply worried</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 22:34:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonathanturley.org/2007/12/04/iowa-prison-program-that-saves-prisoner-pagans-is-ruled-unconstitutional/#comment-2648</guid>
		<description>Commoner, were you answering my post or some other by Patty C?  I didn&#039;t see any from her on this thread (unless it was deleted)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Commoner, were you answering my post or some other by Patty C?  I didn&#8217;t see any from her on this thread (unless it was deleted)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Commoner</title>
		<link>http://jonathanturley.org/2007/12/04/iowa-prison-program-that-saves-prisoner-pagans-is-ruled-unconstitutional/#comment-2630</link>
		<dc:creator>Commoner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 17:09:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonathanturley.org/2007/12/04/iowa-prison-program-that-saves-prisoner-pagans-is-ruled-unconstitutional/#comment-2630</guid>
		<description>No offence to you Patty C, but it seems that the church is much more interested in prostelyzing than in the welfare of the prisoners. Jews for Jesus, funded largely by the Baptists, employs similiar tactics, snagging religously confused or elderly jews and then converting them to Christianity. The strategy here is similiar; many prisoners would grab on to any program that gets them better treatment, just as a religously desperate person is easier to deceive. Preying on the weak is not exactly something any religion should be proud of.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No offence to you Patty C, but it seems that the church is much more interested in prostelyzing than in the welfare of the prisoners. Jews for Jesus, funded largely by the Baptists, employs similiar tactics, snagging religously confused or elderly jews and then converting them to Christianity. The strategy here is similiar; many prisoners would grab on to any program that gets them better treatment, just as a religously desperate person is easier to deceive. Preying on the weak is not exactly something any religion should be proud of.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: deeply worried</title>
		<link>http://jonathanturley.org/2007/12/04/iowa-prison-program-that-saves-prisoner-pagans-is-ruled-unconstitutional/#comment-2625</link>
		<dc:creator>deeply worried</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 15:11:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonathanturley.org/2007/12/04/iowa-prison-program-that-saves-prisoner-pagans-is-ruled-unconstitutional/#comment-2625</guid>
		<description>The 8th Circuit was spot-on.  

Many of us believe that government is forbidden to spend any public monies whatsoever in support of any religious enterprise even if that enterprise is aimed at the general good with no religious qualifications attached.  The faith-based programs of this administration are (to me at least) facially unconstitutional. The government cannot violate the separation of church and state merely because a laudable goal of social welfare is furthered thereby.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The 8th Circuit was spot-on.  </p>
<p>Many of us believe that government is forbidden to spend any public monies whatsoever in support of any religious enterprise even if that enterprise is aimed at the general good with no religious qualifications attached.  The faith-based programs of this administration are (to me at least) facially unconstitutional. The government cannot violate the separation of church and state merely because a laudable goal of social welfare is furthered thereby.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
