<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Federal Judges Suggest that Anti-Clinton Film is Political Advertising and Could Fall Under Disclaimer and Disclosure Rules</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jonathanturley.org/2008/01/11/federal-judges-suggest-that-anti-clinton-film-is-political-advertising-and-could-fall-under-disclaimer-and-disclosure-rules/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jonathanturley.org/2008/01/11/federal-judges-suggest-that-anti-clinton-film-is-political-advertising-and-could-fall-under-disclaimer-and-disclosure-rules/</link>
	<description>Res ipsa loquitur (&#34;The thing itself speaks&#34;)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 May 2012 08:24:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Plumb Bob Blog &#187; Political Advertising For Whom?</title>
		<link>http://jonathanturley.org/2008/01/11/federal-judges-suggest-that-anti-clinton-film-is-political-advertising-and-could-fall-under-disclaimer-and-disclosure-rules/#comment-5892</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Plumb Bob Blog &#187; Political Advertising For Whom?]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 02:29:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonathanturley.org/2008/01/11/federal-judges-suggest-that-anti-clinton-film-is-political-advertising-and-could-fall-under-disclaimer-and-disclosure-rules/#comment-5892</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Excellent legal analysis here by one Jonathan Turley, Prof. at George Washington University Law School. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Excellent legal analysis here by one Jonathan Turley, Prof. at George Washington University Law School. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Plumb Bob Blog &#187; Political Advertising For Whom?</title>
		<link>http://jonathanturley.org/2008/01/11/federal-judges-suggest-that-anti-clinton-film-is-political-advertising-and-could-fall-under-disclaimer-and-disclosure-rules/#comment-5677</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Plumb Bob Blog &#187; Political Advertising For Whom?]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 21:32:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonathanturley.org/2008/01/11/federal-judges-suggest-that-anti-clinton-film-is-political-advertising-and-could-fall-under-disclaimer-and-disclosure-rules/#comment-5677</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Excellent legal analysis by one Jonathan Turley, Prof. at George Washington University Law School. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Excellent legal analysis by one Jonathan Turley, Prof. at George Washington University Law School. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

