Comments on: Court Rules that Children’s Faces Put on Adult Bodies Does Not Constitute Child Porn

By: I Am A Camera: New Hampshire Supreme Court Overturns Prostitution Conviction for Adult Movie Maker « JONATHAN TURLEY

Thu, 11 Dec 2008 11:57:06 +0000

[...] Notably, the New Hampshire Supreme Court recently ruled in the equally interesting question of virtual or computer generated porn, here. [...]

By: Photoshop Porn: Virginia Man Arrested for Computer-Generated Pictures Using Picture of Real Girl Engaged in Fake Sex Act « JONATHAN TURLEY

Wed, 10 Dec 2008 22:08:10 +0000

[...] a fake and does not depict an actual sexual contact. Recently, the Supreme Court of New Hampshire ruled that putting the face of a child on adult bodies did not constitute child pornography. Clearly, [...]

By: Avatar Adultery: Wife Seeks Actual Divorce After Finding Husband In Virtual Affair on Online « JONATHAN TURLEY

Sat, 15 Nov 2008 17:58:47 +0000

[...] virtual child pornography the same crime as the possession of pictures of real children, here and here. In this case, there would be a question of whether taking a prostitute over state lines on the [...]

By: Make Them Accountable / The Nation

Make Them Accountable / The Nation — Mon, 21 Jan 2008 14:54:06 +0000

[...] Court Rules that Children’s Faces Put on Adult Bodies Does Not Constitute Child Porn (by Jonathan Turley) In the last few years, the Supreme Court and lower courts have been considering claims of virtual child pornography — where the images look real but are actually computer generated. It creates a difficult legal question. However, Marshal Zidel presented an equally difficult question for the New Hampshire Supreme Court: Is it child pornography when the camp photographer took the faces of children at the camp and superimposed them on the bodies of adults? The state supreme court ruled that it is not. Disgusting. I don’t know what the answer is to the problem, but this is sick. [...]