<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Jersey Court Orders Man to Pay Child Support Even If He is Not True Father</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jonathanturley.org/2008/01/26/new-jersey-court-order-man-to-pay-child-support-even-if-he-is-not-true-father/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jonathanturley.org/2008/01/26/new-jersey-court-order-man-to-pay-child-support-even-if-he-is-not-true-father/</link>
	<description>Res ipsa loquitur (&#34;The thing itself speaks&#34;)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 02:48:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: New Jersey Courts Make Ex-husband Continue to Pay Child Support Even When He Proved He Was Not the Father &#171; Unfiltered: The Real Dirt Inside Men&#8217;s Minds</title>
		<link>http://jonathanturley.org/2008/01/26/new-jersey-court-order-man-to-pay-child-support-even-if-he-is-not-true-father/#comment-13537</link>
		<dc:creator>New Jersey Courts Make Ex-husband Continue to Pay Child Support Even When He Proved He Was Not the Father &#171; Unfiltered: The Real Dirt Inside Men&#8217;s Minds</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 21:13:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonathanturley.wordpress.com/?p=1032#comment-13537</guid>
		<description>[...] Hat tip: http://jonathanturley.org/2008/01/26/new-jersey-court-order-man-to-pay-child-support-even-if-he-is-n... [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Hat tip: <a href="http://jonathanturley.org/2008/01/26/new-jersey-court-order-man-to-pay-child-support-even-if-he-is-n.." rel="nofollow">http://jonathanturley.org/2008/01/26/new-jersey-court-order-man-to-pay-child-support-even-if-he-is-n..</a>. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mespo727272</title>
		<link>http://jonathanturley.org/2008/01/26/new-jersey-court-order-man-to-pay-child-support-even-if-he-is-not-true-father/#comment-10646</link>
		<dc:creator>mespo727272</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 13:08:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonathanturley.wordpress.com/?p=1032#comment-10646</guid>
		<description>As the perpetrator of a fraud against the cuckolded husband perhaps the mother and biological father are liable to the husband for damages. If so, the husband might do well to sue  the biological father for permitting this fraud to occur if the facts bear that out. (The mother is likely off the hook since any claim against her bears directly on the child assuming she is the custodian and public policy would likely bar that kind of claim).Certainly though the husband he should be able to recoup something from the biological father even under an unjust enrichment or contribution theory in equity. Perhaps he even has claim for interference in the marital contract. Another interesting issue is during the inevitable divorce, would the husband have a claim for legal and physical custody of the child given the court&#039;s enforcement of the presumption that children born during the marriage are of the marriage. What a law school question this might be!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As the perpetrator of a fraud against the cuckolded husband perhaps the mother and biological father are liable to the husband for damages. If so, the husband might do well to sue  the biological father for permitting this fraud to occur if the facts bear that out. (The mother is likely off the hook since any claim against her bears directly on the child assuming she is the custodian and public policy would likely bar that kind of claim).Certainly though the husband he should be able to recoup something from the biological father even under an unjust enrichment or contribution theory in equity. Perhaps he even has claim for interference in the marital contract. Another interesting issue is during the inevitable divorce, would the husband have a claim for legal and physical custody of the child given the court&#8217;s enforcement of the presumption that children born during the marriage are of the marriage. What a law school question this might be!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wife and Mother Go to Court Over Dead Soldier&#8217;s Sperm &#171; JONATHAN TURLEY</title>
		<link>http://jonathanturley.org/2008/01/26/new-jersey-court-order-man-to-pay-child-support-even-if-he-is-not-true-father/#comment-10630</link>
		<dc:creator>Wife and Mother Go to Court Over Dead Soldier&#8217;s Sperm &#171; JONATHAN TURLEY</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 10:01:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonathanturley.wordpress.com/?p=1032#comment-10630</guid>
		<description>[...] artificial insemination increases in use, cases are multiplying as well, click here and here and here. For the full story, click [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] artificial insemination increases in use, cases are multiplying as well, click here and here and here. For the full story, click [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
