<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Maryland Considering Criminalizing Use of Soldiers Names and Images in Protest Tee-Shirts or Material for Sale</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jonathanturley.org/2008/01/30/maryland-considering-criminalizing-use-of-soldiers-names-and-images-in-protest-tee-shirts-or-material-for-sale/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jonathanturley.org/2008/01/30/maryland-considering-criminalizing-use-of-soldiers-names-and-images-in-protest-tee-shirts-or-material-for-sale/</link>
	<description>Res ipsa loquitur (&#34;The thing itself speaks&#34;)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 05:48:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: bluebeans</title>
		<link>http://jonathanturley.org/2008/01/30/maryland-considering-criminalizing-use-of-soldiers-names-and-images-in-protest-tee-shirts-or-material-for-sale/#comment-6188</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bluebeans]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 02:30:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonathanturley.org/2008/01/30/maryland-considering-criminalizing-use-of-soldiers-names-and-images-in-protest-tee-shirts-or-material-for-sale/#comment-6188</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[(In my opinion), obviously there might by the trivial concern of privacy, yet the rights of freedom of speech seem to be dominant of in this arguement. Yet, Mr. Turley, you seem to be one of the few who understand the Constitution, while others just read the excerpts of the grand laws that appeal to their special interests.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(In my opinion), obviously there might by the trivial concern of privacy, yet the rights of freedom of speech seem to be dominant of in this arguement. Yet, Mr. Turley, you seem to be one of the few who understand the Constitution, while others just read the excerpts of the grand laws that appeal to their special interests.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

