Biblical Trip: Expert Suggests Moses Was Probably High on Mount Sinai

Professor Benny Shanon of Jerusalem’s Hebrew University has presented a startling theory: Moses was probably high when he saw the burning bush and received the word of God on Mount Sinai. He has identified a psychoactive molecule on Mount Sinai that is found in plants that produce similar hallucinogenic responses.

Shanon believes that Moses, and others, used plants to achieve these narcotic moments and that this molecule is much like the Amazonian hallucinogenic ayahuasca. He should know. He says that he has tried it and has had similar reactions: “In advanced forms of ayahuasca inebriation, the seeing of light is accompanied by profound religious and spiritual feelings . . . On such occasions, one often feels that in seeing the light, one is encountering the ground of all Being … many identify this power as God.”

Researchers are now working on whether the lyrics “You gotta fight for your right to party” from the Beastie Boy was actually the missing Eleventh Commandment.

For the full story, click here.

6 Responses to “Biblical Trip: Expert Suggests Moses Was Probably High on Mount Sinai”


  1. 1 Jill 1, March 5, 2008 at 2:58 pm

    After consulting the Oracle at Delphi, I am assured this is the “lost commandment”. I do hope Dan Brown takes up the issue!

    All of this is truly interesting. National Geographic (8/14/01) did an article on the Oracle at Delphi. Geology magazine reported:…”hallucinagenic gases”…may have been responsible for the…”Pythia’s prophetic powers…”.

  2. 2 Bob Esq. 1, March 5, 2008 at 8:36 pm

    Maybe it wasn’t a plant at all.

    Maybe it was the ghost of William James with a tank of Nitrous Oxide.

  3. 3 deeply worried 1, March 5, 2008 at 8:38 pm

    So! It would seem that much of the OT and our moral code was based on an acid-trip!!!

    Well, there’s still the Koran and that tome that the Mormon’s read!

  4. 4 Frank 1, March 5, 2008 at 8:51 pm

    “That tome the Mormons read” was described by Mark Twain as “chloroform in print.”

  5. 5 Jill 1, March 5, 2008 at 8:52 pm

    Hippies were right!

  6. 6 deeply worried 1, March 5, 2008 at 9:07 pm

    Never doubted it….


Leave a Reply




VOTED THE #1 LEGAL THEORY AND LAW PROFESSOR BLOG OF THE TOP 100 LEGAL BLOGS BY THE ABA JOURNAL

blawg100_2008_winner9349c7
Bookmark and Share

c

Archives