School Challenged for Barring Service Dog for Autistic Child

The North Franklin Township of Pennsylvania is under challenge for denying 7-year-old Bradley Dallatore’s use of his service dog, Jiffy. It is a case that pits the needs of the child against the school’s claim of the need to protect other children.

Bradley uses Jiffy as a companion and helper — particularly due to the hostility that his disability can engender in other children.

However, the school insists that children are afraid of the Labrador Retriever and some are allergic. Notably, Superintendent Thomas Turnbaugh insists that he will not allow even a guide dog for a blind student to enter the building. It is a position that could be hard to square with the
American Disabilities Act. Under Title I of the ADA, requires employers to make “reasonable accommodations” for qualified individuals with disabilities. This term is defined at 29 C.F.R. Section 1630.2(o) to include service animals, though employers are not necessarily required to provide such animals as opposed to allowing animals to be used. The regulations under Title III protected the use of “personal trained service animals … in any place of public accommodation.” A public school fails into the category of those places covered by “public accommodation.”

Here the dog is not being used to guide or retrieve items but it seems as a true companion. It could raise some interesting questions, but under the law it seems that the school is in a weaker position — particularly in a policy that bars even guide dogs for the blind.

For the full story, click here/

3 Responses to “School Challenged for Barring Service Dog for Autistic Child”


  1. 1 mespo727272 1, April 13, 2008 at 9:24 am

    Nice. Very nice. As my grandmother used to say, may you be blessed with the afflictions you impose on others.

  2. 2 Dissent 1, April 13, 2008 at 11:50 am

    There’s been a similar long-running battle in the East Meadow School District in New York:

    http://www.newsday.com/news/local/longisland/ny-lisimb0311,0,2107672.story

    In the EMSD case, a lot of residents appear to be angry at the student’s mother and doubt her motives, but as a matter of law, does the student have the right to have the dog in school with him? The school is also a public school that receives federal funding.

  3. 3 Service Dogs 1, November 23, 2009 at 4:02 pm

    I think the school district doesn’t want to open the doors to any kind of animals in schools regardless of the need.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s




Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Turley Tweets

Click here to follow the blog on Twitter.

SELECTED AS TOP LEGAL OPINION BLOG (2011)

SELECTED AS TOP LEGAL THEORY AND LAW PROFESSOR BLOG (2008)

blawg100_2008_winner9349c7

Winner — Top Opinion Writer By Aspen Institute and The Week Magazine for Best Single-Issue Advocacy (Civil Liberties)

Categories

Archives


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 780 other followers