Right you are, but I feel more like Jonah in the belly of the beast being whipsawed by the sea. Maybe I can get out through those fine teeth to salvation.

Stop eatin’ all them squirrels–the meat’s too damn tough for a city slicker.

A hillbilly!

DW

Since everyone in my family looks like that (we sit around the wood fireplace grinning at each other before we go out to slop the hogs), I didn’t think nothin’ of it!

Scuse me, I gotta fetch my scatter-gun, I hear a revenooer sneakin up on ma creaky porch!

Darn, foiled again in my pathological desire to have the last word. My hat is permanently off.

Loosely speaking. Thanks for the pun!

It’s an interesting question. It seems to me to suggest a tort of negligent advertising and promotion. I think the problem would be two-fold. First, Donnie enjoys some First Amendment protections as a member of the press, and providing a forum for a manufacturer to discuss his product probably wouldn’t give rise to a duty to the foreseeable purchasers. Secondly, I have real doubts about whether Donnie actually engaged in actually promoting the product. I also am not sure if it is incumbent on Donnie to investigate the product prior to mentioning it on his show. Query, can we sue the owners of the three major TV networks for advertising defective vehicles. Even my admittedly biased plaintiff’s mind set reels at the thought.

Donny, great liberal he is, for some reason never bothered to ask him where they were manufactured and whether they had been tested.

Wonder if Donny was afraid of getting sued if he asked that question on the air.

For sure he could have asked it before airing the segment and refused to put it on the air if he had concerns.

Question; if families saw these on the Donny Deutch show and purchased them and now find out they have lead in them…could they sue Donny????