<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: North Carolina Couple Charged With Bigamy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jonathanturley.org/2008/04/15/north-carolina-couple-charged-with-bigamy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jonathanturley.org/2008/04/15/north-carolina-couple-charged-with-bigamy/</link>
	<description>Res ipsa loquitur (&#34;The thing itself speaks&#34;)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 06:08:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Three Husbands Too Many: Florida Women Charged With Bigamy &#171; JONATHAN TURLEY</title>
		<link>http://jonathanturley.org/2008/04/15/north-carolina-couple-charged-with-bigamy/#comment-14474</link>
		<dc:creator>Three Husbands Too Many: Florida Women Charged With Bigamy &#171; JONATHAN TURLEY</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 12:48:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonathanturley.wordpress.com/?p=1555#comment-14474</guid>
		<description>[...] have seen other bigamy cases recently, here, but this is one for the record [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] have seen other bigamy cases recently, here, but this is one for the record [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jill</title>
		<link>http://jonathanturley.org/2008/04/15/north-carolina-couple-charged-with-bigamy/#comment-11383</link>
		<dc:creator>Jill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 12:52:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonathanturley.wordpress.com/?p=1555#comment-11383</guid>
		<description>There doesn&#039;t seem to be any logical reason that people would not be sexually attracted to and/or deeply love more than one person (unless you&#039;re new age, in which case the person you should love is yourself, everyone else really doesn&#039;t matter!).  

The problem for me arises in the religious/social context of this &quot;choice&quot;.  If your religion tells women they are to be subservient to men, that women must obey men or go to hell, then how much consent is involved in plural marriage?  (Notice also that plural marriage is not women with multiple husbands but only men with multiple wives.) 

Many girls and boys are raised in closed religious communities to believe the above is inherent truth.  They are not allowed access to even minimal education, let alone ideas that challenge the idea of women&#039;s subservience to men.  There is also the forced confinment of women and girls, along with the forced expulsion of young men who are seen as threats to the older men in charge.  

Some belief systems &quot;require&quot; sex with a virgin to cure the man of aids.  Many religions demand the virginity of women as a requisite of marriage.  Where marriage is one of the best, or only options for survival, how does this translate into consent?  

I am certain it never translates into consent for children, but I also think there are many cases where there is no real consent for adult women.  

If children and adults are not given information that makes their religion transparant (ie: there are others ways of thinking about the world) and they are physically/psychologically being threatened then how is this choice?  

I&#039;m certain that consenting adults can choose non-abusive polyamourous relationships.  I don&#039;t think it can be a choice in religious circumstances where no questioning of that religion is allowed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There doesn&#8217;t seem to be any logical reason that people would not be sexually attracted to and/or deeply love more than one person (unless you&#8217;re new age, in which case the person you should love is yourself, everyone else really doesn&#8217;t matter!).  </p>
<p>The problem for me arises in the religious/social context of this &#8220;choice&#8221;.  If your religion tells women they are to be subservient to men, that women must obey men or go to hell, then how much consent is involved in plural marriage?  (Notice also that plural marriage is not women with multiple husbands but only men with multiple wives.) </p>
<p>Many girls and boys are raised in closed religious communities to believe the above is inherent truth.  They are not allowed access to even minimal education, let alone ideas that challenge the idea of women&#8217;s subservience to men.  There is also the forced confinment of women and girls, along with the forced expulsion of young men who are seen as threats to the older men in charge.  </p>
<p>Some belief systems &#8220;require&#8221; sex with a virgin to cure the man of aids.  Many religions demand the virginity of women as a requisite of marriage.  Where marriage is one of the best, or only options for survival, how does this translate into consent?  </p>
<p>I am certain it never translates into consent for children, but I also think there are many cases where there is no real consent for adult women.  </p>
<p>If children and adults are not given information that makes their religion transparant (ie: there are others ways of thinking about the world) and they are physically/psychologically being threatened then how is this choice?  </p>
<p>I&#8217;m certain that consenting adults can choose non-abusive polyamourous relationships.  I don&#8217;t think it can be a choice in religious circumstances where no questioning of that religion is allowed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jill</title>
		<link>http://jonathanturley.org/2008/04/15/north-carolina-couple-charged-with-bigamy/#comment-11330</link>
		<dc:creator>Jill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 20:00:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonathanturley.wordpress.com/?p=1555#comment-11330</guid>
		<description>If you click on the link to the news story the headline reads:

LIVE:  POPE ARRIVES IN U.S.  
COUPLE CHARGED WITH HAVING TWO SPOUSES.

Coincidence?  I think not!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you click on the link to the news story the headline reads:</p>
<p>LIVE:  POPE ARRIVES IN U.S.<br />
COUPLE CHARGED WITH HAVING TWO SPOUSES.</p>
<p>Coincidence?  I think not!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: whooliebacon</title>
		<link>http://jonathanturley.org/2008/04/15/north-carolina-couple-charged-with-bigamy/#comment-11311</link>
		<dc:creator>whooliebacon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 17:42:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonathanturley.wordpress.com/?p=1555#comment-11311</guid>
		<description>This story is ripe for speculation. Maybe he is just a smooth talking con man and she has emotional issues.  Either way there is probably a tornado magnet involved.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This story is ripe for speculation. Maybe he is just a smooth talking con man and she has emotional issues.  Either way there is probably a tornado magnet involved.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bubba</title>
		<link>http://jonathanturley.org/2008/04/15/north-carolina-couple-charged-with-bigamy/#comment-11286</link>
		<dc:creator>Bubba</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 15:29:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonathanturley.wordpress.com/?p=1555#comment-11286</guid>
		<description>They maybe look just a little bitty bit like brother and sis to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They maybe look just a little bitty bit like brother and sis to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
