<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Federal Court Upholds Sexual Harassment Award for Female Guard Harassed by Inmates</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jonathanturley.org/2008/04/17/federal-court-upholds-sexual-harassment-award-for-female-guard-harassed-by-inmates/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jonathanturley.org/2008/04/17/federal-court-upholds-sexual-harassment-award-for-female-guard-harassed-by-inmates/</link>
	<description>Res ipsa loquitur (&#34;The thing itself speaks&#34;)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 May 2012 09:40:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: 1L</title>
		<link>http://jonathanturley.org/2008/04/17/federal-court-upholds-sexual-harassment-award-for-female-guard-harassed-by-inmates/#comment-11513</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[1L]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 18:01:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonathanturley.wordpress.com/?p=1576#comment-11513</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Obviously they acted badly, but this seems like a no win situation for the prison administration (and therefore for the citizens of California).

Option 1: Don&#039;t hire female guards for a maximum security prison. Employment discrimination - pay up.

Option 2: Act as they did, but instead, act to quickly and immediately stop the behavior. Given that this is a maximum security prison - this doesn&#039;t mean taking away snack time. Rather this involves physical intervention by other prison guards. In doing so, not only do you open yourself up to greater medical costs for both guards and inmates, but to potential lawsuits from the inmates should they believe the force to be excessive. Pay up.

Option 3: What they did - pay up.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obviously they acted badly, but this seems like a no win situation for the prison administration (and therefore for the citizens of California).</p>
<p>Option 1: Don&#8217;t hire female guards for a maximum security prison. Employment discrimination &#8211; pay up.</p>
<p>Option 2: Act as they did, but instead, act to quickly and immediately stop the behavior. Given that this is a maximum security prison &#8211; this doesn&#8217;t mean taking away snack time. Rather this involves physical intervention by other prison guards. In doing so, not only do you open yourself up to greater medical costs for both guards and inmates, but to potential lawsuits from the inmates should they believe the force to be excessive. Pay up.</p>
<p>Option 3: What they did &#8211; pay up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

