<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Government Charges Two Former USF Students With Terrorism Counts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jonathanturley.org/2008/04/22/government-charges-two-former-usf-students-with-terrorism-counts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jonathanturley.org/2008/04/22/government-charges-two-former-usf-students-with-terrorism-counts/</link>
	<description>Res ipsa loquitur (&#34;The thing itself speaks&#34;)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 May 2012 09:40:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: mespo727272</title>
		<link>http://jonathanturley.org/2008/04/22/government-charges-two-former-usf-students-with-terrorism-counts/#comment-11712</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mespo727272]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 19:43:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonathanturley.wordpress.com/?p=1621#comment-11712</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have often wondered by what standard do we judge prosecutorial discretion. Judges, depending on whether they are ruling in law (like a criminal case) or equity (like a land partition case) are subject to differing standards on appeal to gauge their decisions. The abuse of discretion standard usually applies in an equity cases, and the concept of legal error usually applies to actions at law, great deference being accorded Judges when they make findings of fact since they actually see the demeanor of the witnesses, and have a flavor for the other evidence. 

Prosecutors in their charging decisions seemingly have no such prohibitions, save that they must have a good faith basis to bring the charge based on the law and the evidence. They may not charge citizens selectively, charging some for a given offense, but not others on the same facts. What happens when they arbitrarily charge someone for political or career advancement reasons? I have never seen a prosecutor hauled before a Bar ethics committee to answer for arbitrary conduct, and I bet no one else has either. Maybe we should establish a separate tort for abuse of prosecutorial discretion and waive sovereign immunity in states that have it. The Duke Lacrosse scandal comes to mind.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have often wondered by what standard do we judge prosecutorial discretion. Judges, depending on whether they are ruling in law (like a criminal case) or equity (like a land partition case) are subject to differing standards on appeal to gauge their decisions. The abuse of discretion standard usually applies in an equity cases, and the concept of legal error usually applies to actions at law, great deference being accorded Judges when they make findings of fact since they actually see the demeanor of the witnesses, and have a flavor for the other evidence. </p>
<p>Prosecutors in their charging decisions seemingly have no such prohibitions, save that they must have a good faith basis to bring the charge based on the law and the evidence. They may not charge citizens selectively, charging some for a given offense, but not others on the same facts. What happens when they arbitrarily charge someone for political or career advancement reasons? I have never seen a prosecutor hauled before a Bar ethics committee to answer for arbitrary conduct, and I bet no one else has either. Maybe we should establish a separate tort for abuse of prosecutorial discretion and waive sovereign immunity in states that have it. The Duke Lacrosse scandal comes to mind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dunder</title>
		<link>http://jonathanturley.org/2008/04/22/government-charges-two-former-usf-students-with-terrorism-counts/#comment-11689</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[dunder]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 12:14:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonathanturley.wordpress.com/?p=1621#comment-11689</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t recall any such &quot;major terrorist coup&quot; blather at the time at all.  Funny how you characterize it as such.  It sounded like they had a trunk full of fireworks or something of that order.  

Whatever on the &quot;explosives&quot;, it is illegal for a person on a student visa to handle a firearm.  If you want to mock his being charged for that; your argument is with the law, not law enforcement.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t recall any such &#8220;major terrorist coup&#8221; blather at the time at all.  Funny how you characterize it as such.  It sounded like they had a trunk full of fireworks or something of that order.  </p>
<p>Whatever on the &#8220;explosives&#8221;, it is illegal for a person on a student visa to handle a firearm.  If you want to mock his being charged for that; your argument is with the law, not law enforcement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Police State in Action &#171; BuelahMan&#8217;s Redstate Revolt</title>
		<link>http://jonathanturley.org/2008/04/22/government-charges-two-former-usf-students-with-terrorism-counts/#comment-11687</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Police State in Action &#171; BuelahMan&#8217;s Redstate Revolt]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 11:58:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonathanturley.wordpress.com/?p=1621#comment-11687</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Posted by buelahman on April 22, 2008  From the Tampa Bay Online (h/t Jonathon Turley): [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Posted by buelahman on April 22, 2008  From the Tampa Bay Online (h/t Jonathon Turley): [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

