By: DeathThreatVictim

DeathThreatVictim — Mon, 16 Jun 2008 18:54:53 +0000

The simple fact is that many lawyers at the Department of Justice, many lawyers in State bar associations, and many Prosecutors at the Federal and State levels are corrupt. Many Judges and prosecutors make less than $200,000 per year yet if the leap frog to and from a partnership at a BigLaw firm they can make over $2 Million per year. Just as rainmakers pull down the big bucks for very little real “hours”, the corrupt players, and their relatives, at DOJ and in the Judiciary are given favored treatment by corrupt BigLaw. It is plain, it is simple it is obvious. Of course Liz in SC has trouble finding a lawyer who is willing to stand up against such corruption. Doing so is the death knell for ones legal practise – a business. Lawyers are chicken to rat out the organized crime. Consider how Eliot Spitzer was doing business with the prostitution ring segment of an organized crime family at the same time that he was New York State’s Attorney General. Shouldn’t a Federal Special Prosecutor be appointed to look into all of the crimes which Eliot Spitzer didn’t prosecute? How about the recording of a death threat delivered by an attorney as he frantically tried to urge his client against bringing conflict of interest and favoritism issues to the attention of the judge and the public in the Worldcom / MCI bankruptcy case? Eliot Spitzer got a written transcript plus a recording, and at the time he went all over the country accusing and seeking settlements from businesses not connected with his associates in the crime family. How could Spitzer have passed up a chance at a slam dunk front page coverage with a death threat recording related to the largest ever corporate fraud in U.S. History? The only logical explanation that I can think of is that the criminals in the bankruptcy ring were somehow related to the organized crime family which held dirt on Spitzer. A press release about this was issued back in 2006 and is still available on the internet, along with a copy of the transcript of which the lawyer confirmed the accuracy.

By: Bob, Esq.

Bob, Esq. — Fri, 30 May 2008 06:28:54 +0000

Wisconsin’s laughable compared to Brooklyn.

By: Liz in SC

Liz in SC — Thu, 29 May 2008 11:04:52 +0000

I think it is wonderful that the state of Wisconsin actually still believes that Judges should remain free of conflict. Unfortunately I am here to sound the alert that a backdoor is being used to change American law as I understand it. I have a situation where no one will reprimand the Judge.
In my case, a Judge refused to acknowledge, accept or admit into evidence a valid court award or order applicable to the situation that was being considered.
I believe someone is trying to establish some case law and precedent and I cannot find an attorney that is willing to challenge this situation. It is very ugly.
But when the law is changed, this case will be the frontrunner for all the scholars to refer to…… in South Carolina, where the ” good ole boys” rule even the lawyers.

Comments on: Wisconsin Supreme Court Reprimands One of Its Own

By: DeathThreatVictim

By: Bob, Esq.

By: Liz in SC