Love Us or Pay Us: Congress Sets a High Price for Citizens to Renounce Their Citizenship

A little noticed provision in new legislation would cost some citizens hundreds of thousands of dollars to renounce their citizenship. Congress has come up with another moronically named bill, Heroes Earnings Assistance and Relief Tax (HEART) Act, that contains the provision. It is designed to stem the tide of Americans renouncing their citizenship due to the double taxation that they face when living abroad.

Under the Act, expatriates who have a net worth of $2 million or more, or a high income, will have to act as if they have sold all their worldwide assets at a fair market price. There have been an increase of such applications under the Bush Administration. Some appear to simply have grown ashamed or opposed to the role that the United States has played for the last eight years in violating international laws. Others are simply tired of paying taxes to two countries. Most countries charge tax on where you live. The United States is one of the minority of nations that charge based on citizenship. The new law is like some form of national alimony law where the country assumes the role of a dependent spouse.

The one law that we certainly do need is to prohibit Congress from continuing the sophomoric titles of acts like HEART. Ever since the Patriot Act, staff members have been spending hours trying to make not-clever acronyms. It is like a high school student council has taken over Congress.

For the full story, click here.

2 Responses to “Love Us or Pay Us: Congress Sets a High Price for Citizens to Renounce Their Citizenship”


  1. 1 Bob, Esq. 1, June 20, 2008 at 6:00 pm

    “It is like a high school student council has taken over Congress.”

    You mean Junior High School at best; don’t you?

    Seems the general mentality of politics never rises above the 4th or 5th grade level of exchanging insults in lieu of argumentation.

  2. 2 K Mansfield 1, June 25, 2008 at 12:04 am

    We’re going backwards.

    It’s indenture, bondage,
    “condition of a serf or slave”

    A servant or slave employed in husbandry, and in some countries attached to the soil and transferred with it, as formerly in Russia.

    In England, at least from the reign of Henry II, one only, and that the inferior species [of villeins], existed . . . But by the customs of France and Germany, persons in this abject state seem to have been called serfs, and distinguished from villeins, who were only bound to fixed payments and duties in respect of their lord, though, as it seems, without any legal redress if injured by him. –Hallam.

    Thanks for the article.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

Gravatar
WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s




Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Turley Tweets

Click here to follow the blog on Twitter.

SELECTED AS TOP LEGAL OPINION BLOG (2011)

SELECTED AS TOP LEGAL THEORY AND LAW PROFESSOR BLOG (2008)

blawg100_2008_winner9349c7

Winner — Top Opinion Writer By Aspen Institute and The Week Magazine for Best Single-Issue Advocacy (Civil Liberties)

Categories

Archives


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 595 other followers