<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Supreme Blunder:  We Did Not Mean to Dissemble the Disassembled Guns in Heller</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jonathanturley.org/2008/06/26/supreme-blunder-we-did-not-mean-to-dissemble-the-disassembled-guns-in-heller/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jonathanturley.org/2008/06/26/supreme-blunder-we-did-not-mean-to-dissemble-the-disassembled-guns-in-heller/</link>
	<description>Res ipsa loquitur (&#34;The thing itself speaks&#34;)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 07:51:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Military Blogger Finds Flaw in Supreme Court&#8217;s Child Rape Ruling &#171; JONATHAN TURLEY</title>
		<link>http://jonathanturley.org/2008/06/26/supreme-blunder-we-did-not-mean-to-dissemble-the-disassembled-guns-in-heller/#comment-15799</link>
		<dc:creator>Military Blogger Finds Flaw in Supreme Court&#8217;s Child Rape Ruling &#171; JONATHAN TURLEY</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 13:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonathanturley.wordpress.com/?p=2213#comment-15799</guid>
		<description>[...] Of course, this term has not been error free with a mistake in Justice Scalia&#8217;s rendition of the provisions of the law in the Heller case on gun rights, click here. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Of course, this term has not been error free with a mistake in Justice Scalia&#8217;s rendition of the provisions of the law in the Heller case on gun rights, click here. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patty C</title>
		<link>http://jonathanturley.org/2008/06/26/supreme-blunder-we-did-not-mean-to-dissemble-the-disassembled-guns-in-heller/#comment-15540</link>
		<dc:creator>Patty C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jun 2008 19:39:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonathanturley.wordpress.com/?p=2213#comment-15540</guid>
		<description>Thingum wrote:
&quot;Paranoia strikes deep

Into your life it will creep… etc.

Jesus H. Christ.&quot;

You should know all about that - just because you thought you were being ignored, didn&#039;t mean you weren&#039;t being ignored ;)

btw, my comprehension level is more than adequate, although I will admit to a certain difficulty understanding why after having stated your point, once, YOU felt the need to repeat it again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thingum wrote:<br />
&#8220;Paranoia strikes deep</p>
<p>Into your life it will creep… etc.</p>
<p>Jesus H. Christ.&#8221;</p>
<p>You should know all about that &#8211; just because you thought you were being ignored, didn&#8217;t mean you weren&#8217;t being ignored <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>btw, my comprehension level is more than adequate, although I will admit to a certain difficulty understanding why after having stated your point, once, YOU felt the need to repeat it again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob, Esq.</title>
		<link>http://jonathanturley.org/2008/06/26/supreme-blunder-we-did-not-mean-to-dissemble-the-disassembled-guns-in-heller/#comment-15506</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob, Esq.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jun 2008 04:05:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonathanturley.wordpress.com/?p=2213#comment-15506</guid>
		<description>Paranoia strikes deep

Into your life it will creep... etc.

Jesus H. Christ.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paranoia strikes deep</p>
<p>Into your life it will creep&#8230; etc.</p>
<p>Jesus H. Christ.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patty C</title>
		<link>http://jonathanturley.org/2008/06/26/supreme-blunder-we-did-not-mean-to-dissemble-the-disassembled-guns-in-heller/#comment-15498</link>
		<dc:creator>Patty C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jun 2008 01:47:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonathanturley.wordpress.com/?p=2213#comment-15498</guid>
		<description>Patty C:

I hope you do not consider me “ganging up” against you. I always value your opinion,and I do not take sides in blog disputes among kindred spirits. I like you both for different reasons and I hope both of you will continue to express yourselves as articulately as you both do.&quot;
****
Dearest mespo, 
Not at all - you did exactly what I would have expected, 
as my friend...

Bob, Esq, is a jerk! 

Sorry!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Patty C:</p>
<p>I hope you do not consider me “ganging up” against you. I always value your opinion,and I do not take sides in blog disputes among kindred spirits. I like you both for different reasons and I hope both of you will continue to express yourselves as articulately as you both do.&#8221;<br />
****<br />
Dearest mespo,<br />
Not at all &#8211; you did exactly what I would have expected,<br />
as my friend&#8230;</p>
<p>Bob, Esq, is a jerk! </p>
<p>Sorry!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mespo72727</title>
		<link>http://jonathanturley.org/2008/06/26/supreme-blunder-we-did-not-mean-to-dissemble-the-disassembled-guns-in-heller/#comment-15490</link>
		<dc:creator>mespo72727</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 23:48:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonathanturley.wordpress.com/?p=2213#comment-15490</guid>
		<description>Patty C:

I hope you do not consider me &quot;ganging up&quot; against you. I always value your opinion,and I do not take sides in blog disputes among kindred spirits. I like you both for different reasons and I hope both of you will continue to express yourselves as articulately as you both do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Patty C:</p>
<p>I hope you do not consider me &#8220;ganging up&#8221; against you. I always value your opinion,and I do not take sides in blog disputes among kindred spirits. I like you both for different reasons and I hope both of you will continue to express yourselves as articulately as you both do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patty C</title>
		<link>http://jonathanturley.org/2008/06/26/supreme-blunder-we-did-not-mean-to-dissemble-the-disassembled-guns-in-heller/#comment-15489</link>
		<dc:creator>Patty C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 23:33:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonathanturley.wordpress.com/?p=2213#comment-15489</guid>
		<description>I dunno JT, you might want to take another look here...

Apparently, Bob Esq, as I regularly and somewhat, affectionately, refer to as &#039;Thingum&#039; (ie Thingum Bob, Esq from EA Poe), wants to nail you to the wall for your use of the word &#039;create&#039; when speaking about the recent SCOTUS 2nd Amendment decision - much like those who ganged up on Scalia over the misspelling of &#039;disassemble&#039;. 

To me, he is annoying and his comments are caustic and abrasive,
 
Mostly, I choose to ignore him.

So what?

I am certainly not a Scalia fan, but I surely know he can criticized for a lot more than mispellings!

It&#039;s interesting that Thingum holds &#039;Lord Scalia&#039;(his insult, not mine) in such contempt when he is, in my view, just as despicable, himself, in so many ways.

I must say, because I have been asked, publicly, and because there seems to be a lack of understanding I would like to explain:

From Bob, Esq&#039;s first post I do not respect him(.) - ie period 
- not as a lawyer, not as a dog/pet-owner/breeder or trainer, not as a man, nor as a person.

He has done  noting nor said anything to redeem himself, in my view.
I have tried to ignore him.

I enjoyed this site much more before he showed up.

I also must say to him directly, now, how dare you, try to interfere, here, with my established relationships.

You are a &#039;wuss&#039; and you would be a bully, in or out, if successful in getting my &#039;friends&#039; to rally against me. 

I dare you to try it again! 

I&#039;m not afraid of you... 
Patty C 

P.S Your AKC German Shepard dogs have BAD manners because YOU do. Consider yourselves on Notice: Anybody showing up on your premises whose bitten without prior warning of the ongoing menace has cause
- you are responsable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I dunno JT, you might want to take another look here&#8230;</p>
<p>Apparently, Bob Esq, as I regularly and somewhat, affectionately, refer to as &#8216;Thingum&#8217; (ie Thingum Bob, Esq from EA Poe), wants to nail you to the wall for your use of the word &#8216;create&#8217; when speaking about the recent SCOTUS 2nd Amendment decision &#8211; much like those who ganged up on Scalia over the misspelling of &#8216;disassemble&#8217;. </p>
<p>To me, he is annoying and his comments are caustic and abrasive,</p>
<p>Mostly, I choose to ignore him.</p>
<p>So what?</p>
<p>I am certainly not a Scalia fan, but I surely know he can criticized for a lot more than mispellings!</p>
<p>It&#8217;s interesting that Thingum holds &#8216;Lord Scalia&#8217;(his insult, not mine) in such contempt when he is, in my view, just as despicable, himself, in so many ways.</p>
<p>I must say, because I have been asked, publicly, and because there seems to be a lack of understanding I would like to explain:</p>
<p>From Bob, Esq&#8217;s first post I do not respect him(.) &#8211; ie period<br />
- not as a lawyer, not as a dog/pet-owner/breeder or trainer, not as a man, nor as a person.</p>
<p>He has done  noting nor said anything to redeem himself, in my view.<br />
I have tried to ignore him.</p>
<p>I enjoyed this site much more before he showed up.</p>
<p>I also must say to him directly, now, how dare you, try to interfere, here, with my established relationships.</p>
<p>You are a &#8216;wuss&#8217; and you would be a bully, in or out, if successful in getting my &#8216;friends&#8217; to rally against me. </p>
<p>I dare you to try it again! </p>
<p>I&#8217;m not afraid of you&#8230;<br />
Patty C </p>
<p>P.S Your AKC German Shepard dogs have BAD manners because YOU do. Consider yourselves on Notice: Anybody showing up on your premises whose bitten without prior warning of the ongoing menace has cause<br />
- you are responsable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
