<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Roberts Court and The Return of the Four Horsemen</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jonathanturley.org/2008/07/02/the-roberts-court-and-the-return-of-the-four-horsemen/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jonathanturley.org/2008/07/02/the-roberts-court-and-the-return-of-the-four-horsemen/</link>
	<description>Res ipsa loquitur (&#34;The thing itself speaks&#34;)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 May 2012 09:58:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Lukehart</title>
		<link>http://jonathanturley.org/2008/07/02/the-roberts-court-and-the-return-of-the-four-horsemen/#comment-29870</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Robert Lukehart]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 21:50:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonathanturley.wordpress.com/?p=2264#comment-29870</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am raising serious constitutional questions at http://www.RobertsCourt.com relating to big media&#039;s role on 9/11. Mockingbird media is a serious anti-trust issue for which the Supreme Court should regard as the highest order of importance. What is the likelihood that such taboo issues can be raised to the Supreme Court?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am raising serious constitutional questions at <a href="http://www.RobertsCourt.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.RobertsCourt.com</a> relating to big media&#8217;s role on 9/11. Mockingbird media is a serious anti-trust issue for which the Supreme Court should regard as the highest order of importance. What is the likelihood that such taboo issues can be raised to the Supreme Court?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Courting Success &#171; Crisis? What Crisis?</title>
		<link>http://jonathanturley.org/2008/07/02/the-roberts-court-and-the-return-of-the-four-horsemen/#comment-28318</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Courting Success &#171; Crisis? What Crisis?]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 00:10:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonathanturley.wordpress.com/?p=2264#comment-28318</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] assessment of Roberts and Alito that gets at the heart of this. And law professor Jonathan Turley pointed out earlier this year that the selling of Roberts as a centrist was as fine a political snow job ever foisted on the [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] assessment of Roberts and Alito that gets at the heart of this. And law professor Jonathan Turley pointed out earlier this year that the selling of Roberts as a centrist was as fine a political snow job ever foisted on the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: g. stokes</title>
		<link>http://jonathanturley.org/2008/07/02/the-roberts-court-and-the-return-of-the-four-horsemen/#comment-25871</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[g. stokes]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 15:21:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonathanturley.wordpress.com/?p=2264#comment-25871</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[please take a look at this website.  www.justiceforwandaspann.com Thank you for your kind consideration in this matter. thanks g. stokes]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>please take a look at this website.  <a href="http://www.justiceforwandaspann.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.justiceforwandaspann.com</a> Thank you for your kind consideration in this matter. thanks g. stokes</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: peter75</title>
		<link>http://jonathanturley.org/2008/07/02/the-roberts-court-and-the-return-of-the-four-horsemen/#comment-20623</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[peter75]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 21:24:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonathanturley.wordpress.com/?p=2264#comment-20623</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I agree with Arlo&#039;s logic. However, since the Senate approved the judicial nominees, I do not believe their votes will be negated in the event the Presidential election of 2004 be proven fraudulent. Justice, unfortunately will not be as extensive as to undo Senate approval. Roberts and Alito, could, out of a sense of personal integrity and honor, offer their resignations upon their realizations that their nominations lacked legitimate Constitutional authority. But I wouldn&#039;t count on it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Arlo&#8217;s logic. However, since the Senate approved the judicial nominees, I do not believe their votes will be negated in the event the Presidential election of 2004 be proven fraudulent. Justice, unfortunately will not be as extensive as to undo Senate approval. Roberts and Alito, could, out of a sense of personal integrity and honor, offer their resignations upon their realizations that their nominations lacked legitimate Constitutional authority. But I wouldn&#8217;t count on it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arlo J. Thudpucker</title>
		<link>http://jonathanturley.org/2008/07/02/the-roberts-court-and-the-return-of-the-four-horsemen/#comment-16395</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Arlo J. Thudpucker]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 13:00:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonathanturley.wordpress.com/?p=2264#comment-16395</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If the next administration can prove the Presidential election of 2004 was a fraud perpetrated upon the American people, it seems apparent that any act promulgated by an illegitimate President would be the poison fruit of a crime.

Among those acts were the nominations of Alito and Roberts.

If the election was proven to be a sham, then the illegal occupant of the White House did not have the authority to nominate Alito and Roberts.

Consequently, they risk being impeached and removed.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the next administration can prove the Presidential election of 2004 was a fraud perpetrated upon the American people, it seems apparent that any act promulgated by an illegitimate President would be the poison fruit of a crime.</p>
<p>Among those acts were the nominations of Alito and Roberts.</p>
<p>If the election was proven to be a sham, then the illegal occupant of the White House did not have the authority to nominate Alito and Roberts.</p>
<p>Consequently, they risk being impeached and removed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

