<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Chinese Change Weather By Changing Weathermen</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jonathanturley.org/2008/08/10/chinese-change-weather-by-changing-weathermen/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jonathanturley.org/2008/08/10/chinese-change-weather-by-changing-weathermen/</link>
	<description>Res ipsa loquitur (&#34;The thing itself speaks&#34;)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 May 2012 11:41:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bush Science: Bush Administration Seeks to Limit Role of the Scientists on Environmental Science &#171; JONATHAN TURLEY</title>
		<link>http://jonathanturley.org/2008/08/10/chinese-change-weather-by-changing-weathermen/#comment-20682</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bush Science: Bush Administration Seeks to Limit Role of the Scientists on Environmental Science &#171; JONATHAN TURLEY]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 13:05:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonathanturley.wordpress.com/?p=3211#comment-20682</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Bush Science: Bush Administration Seeks to Limit Role of the Scientists on Environmental&#160;Science   Published 1, August 13, 2008   Bizarre , Environment , Politics       President Bush has long had problems with science. In his first term, Bush used his own vaulted scientific knowledge to dismiss the findings of his own EPA scientists on global warming as &#8220;junk science.&#8221; Click here. Since that time, he has led one of the most anti-environmental administrations in history and turned the United States into the global villain in opposing significant steps to combat global warming. Now, after scientists linked the threat against polar bears to global warming, Bush is moving to reduce the authority of scientists on such questions. He may have learned this technique on his recent trip to China where the government is a kindred spirit on the environment. The Chinese recently changed pollution forecasts by changing the forecasters, here. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Bush Science: Bush Administration Seeks to Limit Role of the Scientists on Environmental&nbsp;Science   Published 1, August 13, 2008   Bizarre , Environment , Politics       President Bush has long had problems with science. In his first term, Bush used his own vaulted scientific knowledge to dismiss the findings of his own EPA scientists on global warming as &#8220;junk science.&#8221; Click here. Since that time, he has led one of the most anti-environmental administrations in history and turned the United States into the global villain in opposing significant steps to combat global warming. Now, after scientists linked the threat against polar bears to global warming, Bush is moving to reduce the authority of scientists on such questions. He may have learned this technique on his recent trip to China where the government is a kindred spirit on the environment. The Chinese recently changed pollution forecasts by changing the forecasters, here. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gyges</title>
		<link>http://jonathanturley.org/2008/08/10/chinese-change-weather-by-changing-weathermen/#comment-20510</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gyges]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 15:01:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonathanturley.wordpress.com/?p=3211#comment-20510</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Martha,

  The APS is a society of physicists, any opinions they may have about global warming are generally outside their field of expertise. However even if they were experts, some dissent is part of the scientific process, that is just part of how viable theories are further refined. 

 The department of the NAS that deals with climate issues still feels that human activity contributed to global warming. As does the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. These are actual climatologists whose whole career is dedicated to understanding the Earth&#039;s climate, not interested physicists.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Martha,</p>
<p>  The APS is a society of physicists, any opinions they may have about global warming are generally outside their field of expertise. However even if they were experts, some dissent is part of the scientific process, that is just part of how viable theories are further refined. </p>
<p> The department of the NAS that deals with climate issues still feels that human activity contributed to global warming. As does the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. These are actual climatologists whose whole career is dedicated to understanding the Earth&#8217;s climate, not interested physicists.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rafflaw</title>
		<link>http://jonathanturley.org/2008/08/10/chinese-change-weather-by-changing-weathermen/#comment-20483</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[rafflaw]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Aug 2008 21:16:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonathanturley.wordpress.com/?p=3211#comment-20483</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Marth h,
At least try to lie with new information.  It is too easy to refute the lies when they are almost a month old.  As Mespo has so correctly stated, these bloggers were slapped down in their attempt to twist the facts.  Facts are a difficult thing for the neocons.  They sometimes get in the way of their money making.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Marth h,<br />
At least try to lie with new information.  It is too easy to refute the lies when they are almost a month old.  As Mespo has so correctly stated, these bloggers were slapped down in their attempt to twist the facts.  Facts are a difficult thing for the neocons.  They sometimes get in the way of their money making.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mespo727272</title>
		<link>http://jonathanturley.org/2008/08/10/chinese-change-weather-by-changing-weathermen/#comment-20481</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mespo727272]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Aug 2008 20:32:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonathanturley.wordpress.com/?p=3211#comment-20481</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[martha h:

&quot;A handful of APS members ...&quot;

**************

The &quot;handful&quot; were the ones who tried to lie their way around the APS&#039; position. The statement I cited came from the governing board, the APS Council, and not some hair-brained righties with an agenda unrelated to science. Amazing how the APS is bold and cutting edge when they purportedly say what you would like them to say, but weak-kneed and squeamish when they don&#039;t!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>martha h:</p>
<p>&#8220;A handful of APS members &#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>**************</p>
<p>The &#8220;handful&#8221; were the ones who tried to lie their way around the APS&#8217; position. The statement I cited came from the governing board, the APS Council, and not some hair-brained righties with an agenda unrelated to science. Amazing how the APS is bold and cutting edge when they purportedly say what you would like them to say, but weak-kneed and squeamish when they don&#8217;t!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: martha h</title>
		<link>http://jonathanturley.org/2008/08/10/chinese-change-weather-by-changing-weathermen/#comment-20480</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[martha h]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Aug 2008 20:20:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonathanturley.wordpress.com/?p=3211#comment-20480</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[mes:  A handful of APS members demanding like children that something be printed to show they objected to the new belief is to be expected.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>mes:  A handful of APS members demanding like children that something be printed to show they objected to the new belief is to be expected.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mespo727272</title>
		<link>http://jonathanturley.org/2008/08/10/chinese-change-weather-by-changing-weathermen/#comment-20468</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mespo727272]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Aug 2008 18:46:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonathanturley.wordpress.com/?p=3211#comment-20468</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[martha h:

This is more right-wing deception. Because APS sponsored a debate on the topic in a news letter, several right wing wacko bloggers decided that the venerable society had modified its stance. Using the time tested &quot;big lie&quot; technique pioneered by their apparent mentor Joseph Goebbels, they rushed to the keyboard to trumpet a major policy change.In fact, APS had done no such thing and had to issue the following statement:

&quot;The American Physical Society reaffirms the following position on climate change, adopted by its governing body, the APS Council, on November 18, 2007:

“Emissions of greenhouse gases from human activities are changing the atmosphere in ways that affect the Earth’s climate.”

An article at odds with this statement recently appeared in an online newsletter of the APS Forum on Physics and Society, one of 39 units of APS. The header of this newsletter carries the statement that “Opinions expressed are those of the authors alone and do not necessarily reflect the views of the APS or of the Forum.” This newsletter is not a journal of the APS and it is not peer reviewed.”

martha h, a good liar is always fun to expose. For you though, the lie is second hand and your credulity or just plain obsequiousness to your cause is tiring.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>martha h:</p>
<p>This is more right-wing deception. Because APS sponsored a debate on the topic in a news letter, several right wing wacko bloggers decided that the venerable society had modified its stance. Using the time tested &#8220;big lie&#8221; technique pioneered by their apparent mentor Joseph Goebbels, they rushed to the keyboard to trumpet a major policy change.In fact, APS had done no such thing and had to issue the following statement:</p>
<p>&#8220;The American Physical Society reaffirms the following position on climate change, adopted by its governing body, the APS Council, on November 18, 2007:</p>
<p>“Emissions of greenhouse gases from human activities are changing the atmosphere in ways that affect the Earth’s climate.”</p>
<p>An article at odds with this statement recently appeared in an online newsletter of the APS Forum on Physics and Society, one of 39 units of APS. The header of this newsletter carries the statement that “Opinions expressed are those of the authors alone and do not necessarily reflect the views of the APS or of the Forum.” This newsletter is not a journal of the APS and it is not peer reviewed.”</p>
<p>martha h, a good liar is always fun to expose. For you though, the lie is second hand and your credulity or just plain obsequiousness to your cause is tiring.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: martha h</title>
		<link>http://jonathanturley.org/2008/08/10/chinese-change-weather-by-changing-weathermen/#comment-20466</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[martha h]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Aug 2008 18:27:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonathanturley.wordpress.com/?p=3211#comment-20466</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[rafflaw:  re: global warming: for starters:

Myth of Consensus Explodes: APS Opens Global Warming Debate
Michael Asher (Blog) - July 16, 2008 9:35 PM

The American Physical Society, an organization representing nearly 50,000 physicists, has reversed its stance on climate change and is now proclaiming that many of its members disbelieve in human-induced global warming.  The APS is also sponsoring public debate on the validity of global warming science.  The leadership of the society had previously called the evidence for global warming &quot;incontrovertible.&quot;

In a posting to the APS forum, editor Jeffrey Marque explains,&quot;There is a considerable presence within the scientific community of people who do not agree with the IPCC conclusion that anthropogenic CO2 emissions are very probably likely to be primarily responsible for global warming that has occurred since the Industrial Revolution.&quot;

The APS is opening its debate with the publication of a paper by Lord Monckton of Brenchley, which concludes that climate sensitivity -- the rate of temperature change a given amount of greenhouse gas will cause -- has been grossly overstated by IPCC modeling.   A low sensitivity implies additional atmospheric CO2 will have little effect on global climate.

Larry Gould, Professor of Physics at the University of Hartford and Chairman of the New England Section of the APS, called Monckton&#039;s paper an &quot;expose of the IPCC that details numerous exaggerations and &quot;extensive errors&quot;

In an email to DailyTech, Monckton says, &quot;I was dismayed to discover that the IPCC&#039;s 2001 and 2007 reports did not devote chapters to the central &#039;climate sensitivity&#039; question, and did not explain in proper, systematic detail the methods by which they evaluated it. When I began to investigate, it seemed that the IPCC was deliberately concealing and obscuring its method.&quot;  

According to Monckton, there is substantial support for his results, &quot;in the peer-reviewed literature, most articles on climate sensitivity conclude, as I have done, that climate sensitivity must be harmlessly low.&quot;

Monckton, who was the science advisor to Britain&#039;s Thatcher administration, says natural variability is the cause of most of the Earth&#039;s recent warming.   &quot;In the past 70 years the Sun was more active than at almost any other time in the past 11,400 years ... Mars, Jupiter, Neptune’s largest moon, and Pluto warmed at the same time as Earth.&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>rafflaw:  re: global warming: for starters:</p>
<p>Myth of Consensus Explodes: APS Opens Global Warming Debate<br />
Michael Asher (Blog) &#8211; July 16, 2008 9:35 PM</p>
<p>The American Physical Society, an organization representing nearly 50,000 physicists, has reversed its stance on climate change and is now proclaiming that many of its members disbelieve in human-induced global warming.  The APS is also sponsoring public debate on the validity of global warming science.  The leadership of the society had previously called the evidence for global warming &#8220;incontrovertible.&#8221;</p>
<p>In a posting to the APS forum, editor Jeffrey Marque explains,&#8221;There is a considerable presence within the scientific community of people who do not agree with the IPCC conclusion that anthropogenic CO2 emissions are very probably likely to be primarily responsible for global warming that has occurred since the Industrial Revolution.&#8221;</p>
<p>The APS is opening its debate with the publication of a paper by Lord Monckton of Brenchley, which concludes that climate sensitivity &#8212; the rate of temperature change a given amount of greenhouse gas will cause &#8212; has been grossly overstated by IPCC modeling.   A low sensitivity implies additional atmospheric CO2 will have little effect on global climate.</p>
<p>Larry Gould, Professor of Physics at the University of Hartford and Chairman of the New England Section of the APS, called Monckton&#8217;s paper an &#8220;expose of the IPCC that details numerous exaggerations and &#8220;extensive errors&#8221;</p>
<p>In an email to DailyTech, Monckton says, &#8220;I was dismayed to discover that the IPCC&#8217;s 2001 and 2007 reports did not devote chapters to the central &#8216;climate sensitivity&#8217; question, and did not explain in proper, systematic detail the methods by which they evaluated it. When I began to investigate, it seemed that the IPCC was deliberately concealing and obscuring its method.&#8221;  </p>
<p>According to Monckton, there is substantial support for his results, &#8220;in the peer-reviewed literature, most articles on climate sensitivity conclude, as I have done, that climate sensitivity must be harmlessly low.&#8221;</p>
<p>Monckton, who was the science advisor to Britain&#8217;s Thatcher administration, says natural variability is the cause of most of the Earth&#8217;s recent warming.   &#8220;In the past 70 years the Sun was more active than at almost any other time in the past 11,400 years &#8230; Mars, Jupiter, Neptune’s largest moon, and Pluto warmed at the same time as Earth.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Emily</title>
		<link>http://jonathanturley.org/2008/08/10/chinese-change-weather-by-changing-weathermen/#comment-20463</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Emily]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Aug 2008 18:01:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonathanturley.wordpress.com/?p=3211#comment-20463</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ah so capitalism isn&#039;t everything they learned from America.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah so capitalism isn&#8217;t everything they learned from America.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gyges</title>
		<link>http://jonathanturley.org/2008/08/10/chinese-change-weather-by-changing-weathermen/#comment-20462</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gyges]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Aug 2008 18:00:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonathanturley.wordpress.com/?p=3211#comment-20462</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Martha,

 Not according to the National Academy Of Sciences, you know the organization founded by Congress in 1863 to be give independent  unbiased advice and recommendations about science and technology.

http://dels.nas.edu/globalchange/clim.shtml
http://dels.nas.edu/dels/faq.shtml#gov]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Martha,</p>
<p> Not according to the National Academy Of Sciences, you know the organization founded by Congress in 1863 to be give independent  unbiased advice and recommendations about science and technology.</p>
<p><a href="http://dels.nas.edu/globalchange/clim.shtml" rel="nofollow">http://dels.nas.edu/globalchange/clim.shtml</a><br />
<a href="http://dels.nas.edu/dels/faq.shtml#gov" rel="nofollow">http://dels.nas.edu/dels/faq.shtml#gov</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jill</title>
		<link>http://jonathanturley.org/2008/08/10/chinese-change-weather-by-changing-weathermen/#comment-20452</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jill]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Aug 2008 15:44:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonathanturley.wordpress.com/?p=3211#comment-20452</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This quote is taken from, &quot;Novels in Three Lines&quot; by Felix Feneon.  (He is from FRANCE and is an anarchist.)  &quot;The fever, of military origin, that is raging in Rouillac, Charente, is getting worse and spreading.  Preventative measurures have been taken.&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This quote is taken from, &#8220;Novels in Three Lines&#8221; by Felix Feneon.  (He is from FRANCE and is an anarchist.)  &#8220;The fever, of military origin, that is raging in Rouillac, Charente, is getting worse and spreading.  Preventative measurures have been taken.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jill</title>
		<link>http://jonathanturley.org/2008/08/10/chinese-change-weather-by-changing-weathermen/#comment-20448</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jill]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Aug 2008 15:19:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonathanturley.wordpress.com/?p=3211#comment-20448</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi raffLOW!  Curse be you!!

I thought martha was chinese and now we know for certain!  I was thinking the same thing about govt. techniques for controlling knowledge and people.  In Georgia, the whole cell phone system was down yesterday.  In China whole things disappear on the internet and &quot;news&quot; as happens in the US.  I think the people who do ham radio are on the right track.  The latest technology is wonderful, but that old time religion (ham radio) is harder for them to control.   

No authoritarian regime can survive without willing minions in the populace.  We&#039;ve got several of those here.  

Jill]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi raffLOW!  Curse be you!!</p>
<p>I thought martha was chinese and now we know for certain!  I was thinking the same thing about govt. techniques for controlling knowledge and people.  In Georgia, the whole cell phone system was down yesterday.  In China whole things disappear on the internet and &#8220;news&#8221; as happens in the US.  I think the people who do ham radio are on the right track.  The latest technology is wonderful, but that old time religion (ham radio) is harder for them to control.   </p>
<p>No authoritarian regime can survive without willing minions in the populace.  We&#8217;ve got several of those here.  </p>
<p>Jill</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mespo727272</title>
		<link>http://jonathanturley.org/2008/08/10/chinese-change-weather-by-changing-weathermen/#comment-20447</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mespo727272]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Aug 2008 15:17:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonathanturley.wordpress.com/?p=3211#comment-20447</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For those wondering how our conservative brethren spell &quot;science&quot; with four letters: S-I-N-Z. &quot;Energy&quot; only gets three letters: N-R-G. And poor ol&#039; George W. Bush get relegated to three letters: G-O-D.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For those wondering how our conservative brethren spell &#8220;science&#8221; with four letters: S-I-N-Z. &#8220;Energy&#8221; only gets three letters: N-R-G. And poor ol&#8217; George W. Bush get relegated to three letters: G-O-D.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mespo727272</title>
		<link>http://jonathanturley.org/2008/08/10/chinese-change-weather-by-changing-weathermen/#comment-20446</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mespo727272]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Aug 2008 15:13:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonathanturley.wordpress.com/?p=3211#comment-20446</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[rafflaw:

Come now rafflaw, poor martha h gets all her information at church over donuts and orange juice and she has now come to the firm conclusion that snakes talk, Bush is good for America, and global warming is the mad notion of evil-godless-liberals (one word). To conservatives like her, science is a &quot;four letter word,&quot; (some even think it is literally) and &quot;consensus,&quot; why that&#039;s work of the devil.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>rafflaw:</p>
<p>Come now rafflaw, poor martha h gets all her information at church over donuts and orange juice and she has now come to the firm conclusion that snakes talk, Bush is good for America, and global warming is the mad notion of evil-godless-liberals (one word). To conservatives like her, science is a &#8220;four letter word,&#8221; (some even think it is literally) and &#8220;consensus,&#8221; why that&#8217;s work of the devil.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rafflaw</title>
		<link>http://jonathanturley.org/2008/08/10/chinese-change-weather-by-changing-weathermen/#comment-20442</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[rafflaw]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Aug 2008 14:23:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonathanturley.wordpress.com/?p=3211#comment-20442</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Martha h,
How can you state outright lies like that and sleep at night.  Are you being paid by Exxon like the Bush regime and McCain?  The new scientific consensus that you claim does not exist.  Give us the citation(s) to this alleged consensus.  You might want to stop watching Fox News so much.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Martha h,<br />
How can you state outright lies like that and sleep at night.  Are you being paid by Exxon like the Bush regime and McCain?  The new scientific consensus that you claim does not exist.  Give us the citation(s) to this alleged consensus.  You might want to stop watching Fox News so much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: martha h</title>
		<link>http://jonathanturley.org/2008/08/10/chinese-change-weather-by-changing-weathermen/#comment-20440</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[martha h]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Aug 2008 14:00:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonathanturley.wordpress.com/?p=3211#comment-20440</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[rafflow: The new scientific consensus is that global warming, if it is happening at all, is a natural event having nothing to do with man&#039;s activities.

Grow up and stop spouting your (100 foot houseboat, 20,000 foot mansion) Al Gore nonsense.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>rafflow: The new scientific consensus is that global warming, if it is happening at all, is a natural event having nothing to do with man&#8217;s activities.</p>
<p>Grow up and stop spouting your (100 foot houseboat, 20,000 foot mansion) Al Gore nonsense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rafflaw</title>
		<link>http://jonathanturley.org/2008/08/10/chinese-change-weather-by-changing-weathermen/#comment-20439</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[rafflaw]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Aug 2008 13:36:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonathanturley.wordpress.com/?p=3211#comment-20439</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jill,
It is the same techniques that the Bush regime has been using.  The consistent talking points and the control over the scientific community on global warming.  We learned the torture from them and it seems, how to control the masses.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jill,<br />
It is the same techniques that the Bush regime has been using.  The consistent talking points and the control over the scientific community on global warming.  We learned the torture from them and it seems, how to control the masses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jill</title>
		<link>http://jonathanturley.org/2008/08/10/chinese-change-weather-by-changing-weathermen/#comment-20437</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jill]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Aug 2008 13:26:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonathanturley.wordpress.com/?p=3211#comment-20437</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well they got the &quot;mist&quot; part right!

Have you noticed that all the &quot;interviews on the street&quot; have the Chinese people saying almost the same things?--glory of China&#039;s past and their bright new future etc.  This govt. really knows how to stay on message.  You&#039;ll die for not trying!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well they got the &#8220;mist&#8221; part right!</p>
<p>Have you noticed that all the &#8220;interviews on the street&#8221; have the Chinese people saying almost the same things?&#8211;glory of China&#8217;s past and their bright new future etc.  This govt. really knows how to stay on message.  You&#8217;ll die for not trying!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

