No Leg to Stand On: Prosecutors Refuse to Give Back Prosthetic Leg of Shooting Victim

There is a showdown brewing in Box Butte County, Nebraska. On one side are prosecutors has a standing case against a defendant and on the other is Val McCabe who just wants to stand. Val, and his brilliantly named wife Muffy Buckles, are suing the county for his leg back despite the prosecutors insistence that it is evidence being held by the Alliance Police Department.

McCabe, 58, was shot five times by a group of kids. He was hit in the upper left arm, his left groin, right buttock, right scapula and a bullet also penetrated his below-the-knee left leg prosthesis. Doctors will not allow him to use crutches due to the danger popping his stitches. Worse yet, his house cannot accommodate a wheelchair so he needs the prosthetic to get around. The leg cost $28,000 and took weeks to custom build and fit.

Box Butte County Attorney Kathleen Hutchinson said no (clearly finding no problem with standing for McCabe). Clearly there must be testing of the bullet and prosecutors are concerned about chain of custody. However, the bullet was already removed. Once removed, photographs, videotapes, and other means could be used to establish the evidence. Moreover, given the hits all over his body, the leg is not absolutely essential to the trial. Finally, if properly documented, it can still be used as an exhibit.

Box Butte County District Judge Brian Silverman clearly agreed and ordered the leg returned.

It is not clear why Hutchinson would adopt such an inflexible position (no pun intended) but the court clearly found that she had no leg to stand on (pun intended).

For the full article, click here.

7 Responses to “No Leg to Stand On: Prosecutors Refuse to Give Back Prosthetic Leg of Shooting Victim”


  1. 1 david 1, September 5, 2008 at 10:13 am

    Finally, a ruling on the issue of “standing” that I agree with!

  2. 2 Bob, Esq. 1, September 5, 2008 at 1:04 pm

    The prosecution is just ensuring it has a leg up in the case.

  3. 3 Cro Magnum Man 1, September 5, 2008 at 2:10 pm

    Yea Bob, but they don’t have a leg to stand on.

  4. 4 Cro Magnum Man 1, September 5, 2008 at 2:43 pm

    Seriously this case is a travesty. Once more I am left asking myself who raises these people, who’s judgment is so far from sane, that they’d take a mans prosthetic leg?

    One things certain in this country with our criminal justice system.

    If you’re a victim of a crime, prepare to be further victimized by the criminal justice system.

  5. 5 seamus 1, September 5, 2008 at 3:35 pm

    mmmmmmm…….Muffy Buckles…..me likey

  6. 6 david 1, September 5, 2008 at 3:59 pm

    The prosecutor heard that dismemberment was an aggravating factor but misunderstood the context.

  7. 7 rafflaw 1, September 5, 2008 at 9:32 pm

    This victim should contact “Lt. Dan” of Forrest Gump fame and find out where he bought his “magic legs”!


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s




Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Turley Tweets

Click here to follow the blog on Twitter.

SELECTED AS TOP LEGAL OPINION BLOG (2011)

SELECTED AS TOP LEGAL THEORY AND LAW PROFESSOR BLOG (2008)

blawg100_2008_winner9349c7

Winner — Top Opinion Writer By Aspen Institute and The Week Magazine for Best Single-Issue Advocacy (Civil Liberties)

Categories

Archives


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 781 other followers