<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Michigan Court Narrows Definition of Sex Offender to Exclude Bestiality</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jonathanturley.org/2008/09/26/michigan-court-narrows-definition-of-sex-offender-to-exclude-bestiality/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jonathanturley.org/2008/09/26/michigan-court-narrows-definition-of-sex-offender-to-exclude-bestiality/</link>
	<description>Res ipsa loquitur (&#34;The thing itself speaks&#34;)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 05:16:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: david</title>
		<link>http://jonathanturley.org/2008/09/26/michigan-court-narrows-definition-of-sex-offender-to-exclude-bestiality/#comment-25272</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[david]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 03:02:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonathanturley.wordpress.com/?p=4146#comment-25272</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ewe! Umm, I mean &quot;Eww!&quot;  

Do you suppose he thought he would avoid publicity if he didn&#039;t have to register? Not be in the public eye?  Oops.  Be careful what you wish for, I guess.  

In a few years, he&#039;ll be in the second round of a job interview and the boss will say, &#039;well, you passed the background check, but, wait a minute... you look familiar...&quot;   

Seriously, the animal rights people will be all over this.  I found this ouonce when wrote a letter to the editor in which I pointed out that a Menard&#039;s ad which showed a golden retriever penned in a 6 by 6 kennel showed a violation of Omaha&#039;s &quot;cruelty to animals&quot; ordinance.  The law forbid providing a dog over 40 lbs. with less than 40 square feet of space, so anyone imitating the ad, I observed, risked a conviction for &quot;cruelty&quot; which would be hard to explain away.  I assumed people would be upset about this intrusion on liberty but overwhelmingly the replies focused on the need to protect animals.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ewe! Umm, I mean &#8220;Eww!&#8221;  </p>
<p>Do you suppose he thought he would avoid publicity if he didn&#8217;t have to register? Not be in the public eye?  Oops.  Be careful what you wish for, I guess.  </p>
<p>In a few years, he&#8217;ll be in the second round of a job interview and the boss will say, &#8216;well, you passed the background check, but, wait a minute&#8230; you look familiar&#8230;&#8221;   </p>
<p>Seriously, the animal rights people will be all over this.  I found this ouonce when wrote a letter to the editor in which I pointed out that a Menard&#8217;s ad which showed a golden retriever penned in a 6 by 6 kennel showed a violation of Omaha&#8217;s &#8220;cruelty to animals&#8221; ordinance.  The law forbid providing a dog over 40 lbs. with less than 40 square feet of space, so anyone imitating the ad, I observed, risked a conviction for &#8220;cruelty&#8221; which would be hard to explain away.  I assumed people would be upset about this intrusion on liberty but overwhelmingly the replies focused on the need to protect animals.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 3L</title>
		<link>http://jonathanturley.org/2008/09/26/michigan-court-narrows-definition-of-sex-offender-to-exclude-bestiality/#comment-25056</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[3L]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 18:15:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonathanturley.wordpress.com/?p=4146#comment-25056</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I agree with the panel.  Maybe this guy could have an &quot;emergency rule&quot; amputation like our friend in Kentucky.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with the panel.  Maybe this guy could have an &#8220;emergency rule&#8221; amputation like our friend in Kentucky.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

