<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rants and Raves:  Man Criminally Charged for Alleged Libel on Craigslist</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jonathanturley.org/2008/12/03/rants-and-raves-man-criminally-charged-for-alleged-libel-on-craigslist/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jonathanturley.org/2008/12/03/rants-and-raves-man-criminally-charged-for-alleged-libel-on-craigslist/</link>
	<description>Res ipsa loquitur (&#34;The thing itself speaks&#34;)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 22:05:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: &#8220;Skanks in NYC&#8221;: Former Vogue Model Sues Google to Uncover Anonymous Sources &#171; JONATHAN TURLEY</title>
		<link>http://jonathanturley.org/2008/12/03/rants-and-raves-man-criminally-charged-for-alleged-libel-on-craigslist/#comment-33879</link>
		<dc:creator>&#8220;Skanks in NYC&#8221;: Former Vogue Model Sues Google to Uncover Anonymous Sources &#171; JONATHAN TURLEY</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 14:48:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonathanturley.wordpress.com/?p=6005#comment-33879</guid>
		<description>[...] Then there is the complication that Cohen is a public figure, which puts her under the higher standard of proof of New York Times v. Sullivan. While her career has diminished in recent years, she would still satisfy the standard for a public figure and need to prove actual malice (which would seem easier than usual here). Google itself is not likely liable under governing precedent such as the Zeran case, discussed here. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Then there is the complication that Cohen is a public figure, which puts her under the higher standard of proof of New York Times v. Sullivan. While her career has diminished in recent years, she would still satisfy the standard for a public figure and need to prove actual malice (which would seem easier than usual here). Google itself is not likely liable under governing precedent such as the Zeran case, discussed here. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rockola</title>
		<link>http://jonathanturley.org/2008/12/03/rants-and-raves-man-criminally-charged-for-alleged-libel-on-craigslist/#comment-30230</link>
		<dc:creator>Rockola</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 03:52:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonathanturley.wordpress.com/?p=6005#comment-30230</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s &quot;bear,&quot; not &quot;bare,&quot; responsibility, yo?!
I absolutely love your appearances on Countdown and your blog, but you need a good proofreader. Seriously.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s &#8220;bear,&#8221; not &#8220;bare,&#8221; responsibility, yo?!<br />
I absolutely love your appearances on Countdown and your blog, but you need a good proofreader. Seriously.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
