<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Supreme Court Grants Review in Al-Marri Enemy Combatant Case</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jonathanturley.org/2008/12/05/supreme-court-grants-review-in-al-marri-enemy-combatant-case/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jonathanturley.org/2008/12/05/supreme-court-grants-review-in-al-marri-enemy-combatant-case/</link>
	<description>Res ipsa loquitur (&#34;The thing itself speaks&#34;)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 05:09:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil S</title>
		<link>http://jonathanturley.org/2008/12/05/supreme-court-grants-review-in-al-marri-enemy-combatant-case/#comment-30434</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Neil S]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Dec 2008 13:41:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonathanturley.org/?p=6118#comment-30434</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If this gets argued bedore the SCOTUS, maybe POTUS Obama should ask U.S. Attorney Mary Beth Buchanan to argue it (instead of firing her).
I realize the fact that she has no experience at the appellate level might hurt its chances, but ...

Peace.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If this gets argued bedore the SCOTUS, maybe POTUS Obama should ask U.S. Attorney Mary Beth Buchanan to argue it (instead of firing her).<br />
I realize the fact that she has no experience at the appellate level might hurt its chances, but &#8230;</p>
<p>Peace.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jill</title>
		<link>http://jonathanturley.org/2008/12/05/supreme-court-grants-review-in-al-marri-enemy-combatant-case/#comment-30398</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jill]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2008 20:57:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonathanturley.org/?p=6118#comment-30398</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sorry,

The last paragraph should be in quotes also ( it&#039;s from the same source).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry,</p>
<p>The last paragraph should be in quotes also ( it&#8217;s from the same source).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jill</title>
		<link>http://jonathanturley.org/2008/12/05/supreme-court-grants-review-in-al-marri-enemy-combatant-case/#comment-30396</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jill]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2008 20:56:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonathanturley.org/?p=6118#comment-30396</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The following is from the National Lawyers Guild:
&quot;The Guild opposes the creation of national security courts to try the detainees. Although Obama said in August, &quot;It&#039;s time to better protect the American people and our values by bringing swift and sure justice to terrorists through our courts and our Uniform Code of Military Justice,&quot; three Obama advisers told the Associated Press that the President-elect is expected to propose a new court system to deal with &quot;sensitive national security cases.&quot;...

President-elect Obama should send those prisoners he intends to try to U.S. civilian and military courts, which are well-suited to protect national security concerns. He should eschew the creation of a new system of courts with reduced due process, which will raise many of the same concerns as Bush&#039;s dreaded military commissions.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The following is from the National Lawyers Guild:<br />
&#8220;The Guild opposes the creation of national security courts to try the detainees. Although Obama said in August, &#8220;It&#8217;s time to better protect the American people and our values by bringing swift and sure justice to terrorists through our courts and our Uniform Code of Military Justice,&#8221; three Obama advisers told the Associated Press that the President-elect is expected to propose a new court system to deal with &#8220;sensitive national security cases.&#8221;&#8230;</p>
<p>President-elect Obama should send those prisoners he intends to try to U.S. civilian and military courts, which are well-suited to protect national security concerns. He should eschew the creation of a new system of courts with reduced due process, which will raise many of the same concerns as Bush&#8217;s dreaded military commissions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Former Federal LEO</title>
		<link>http://jonathanturley.org/2008/12/05/supreme-court-grants-review-in-al-marri-enemy-combatant-case/#comment-30341</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Former Federal LEO]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2008 05:47:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonathanturley.org/?p=6118#comment-30341</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[tf,

I would say yes, until Congress amends the language in the Authorization for Use of Military Force bill giving the president ridiculously broad and unspecified powers.

However, Mr. Obama would be foolish to reverse Bush’s decision and then be in the position of justifying Bush’s initial ‘enemy combatant’ declaration. No thinking person would do that.

How did so many intelligent Americans hand over so much power to an incompetent imbecile like Mr. Bush?  I am a conservative Republican and I can say unequivocally that I despise the man for all of the death and fiscal/infrastructure destruction for which he is responsible. 

Furthermore, I voted for President-elect Obama but I do not want him or any other president to have the level of powers that Mr. Bush now has.  Congress must amend those powers soon after the Inauguration]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>tf,</p>
<p>I would say yes, until Congress amends the language in the Authorization for Use of Military Force bill giving the president ridiculously broad and unspecified powers.</p>
<p>However, Mr. Obama would be foolish to reverse Bush’s decision and then be in the position of justifying Bush’s initial ‘enemy combatant’ declaration. No thinking person would do that.</p>
<p>How did so many intelligent Americans hand over so much power to an incompetent imbecile like Mr. Bush?  I am a conservative Republican and I can say unequivocally that I despise the man for all of the death and fiscal/infrastructure destruction for which he is responsible. </p>
<p>Furthermore, I voted for President-elect Obama but I do not want him or any other president to have the level of powers that Mr. Bush now has.  Congress must amend those powers soon after the Inauguration</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tf gray</title>
		<link>http://jonathanturley.org/2008/12/05/supreme-court-grants-review-in-al-marri-enemy-combatant-case/#comment-30340</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[tf gray]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2008 05:15:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonathanturley.org/?p=6118#comment-30340</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Question: If Bush can move al Marri from enemy combatant to criminal status on pure whim to avoid the Supreme Court ruling on the case, can Obama reverse his status back to enemy combatant to allow the suit to proceed?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Question: If Bush can move al Marri from enemy combatant to criminal status on pure whim to avoid the Supreme Court ruling on the case, can Obama reverse his status back to enemy combatant to allow the suit to proceed?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

