<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;Skanks in NYC&#8221;:  Former Vogue Model In Court to Force Google to Uncover Anonymous Sources</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jonathanturley.org/2009/01/08/skanks-in-nyc-former-vogue-model-sues-google-to-uncover-anonymous-sources/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jonathanturley.org/2009/01/08/skanks-in-nyc-former-vogue-model-sues-google-to-uncover-anonymous-sources/</link>
	<description>Res ipsa loquitur (&#34;The thing itself speaks&#34;)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 May 2012 11:49:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shooting a Vilan: No Charges Against Officer Who Killed Man After Grabbing His Girlfriend &#171; JONATHAN TURLEY</title>
		<link>http://jonathanturley.org/2009/01/08/skanks-in-nyc-former-vogue-model-sues-google-to-uncover-anonymous-sources/#comment-34651</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Shooting a Vilan: No Charges Against Officer Who Killed Man After Grabbing His Girlfriend &#171; JONATHAN TURLEY]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 15:22:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonathanturley.org/?p=6903#comment-34651</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] this guy get a well-earned six years for smashing a bottle in someone&#039;s face, but the attacker of model Liskula Cohen gets 30 days in New [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] this guy get a well-earned six years for smashing a bottle in someone&#8217;s face, but the attacker of model Liskula Cohen gets 30 days in New [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mercie</title>
		<link>http://jonathanturley.org/2009/01/08/skanks-in-nyc-former-vogue-model-sues-google-to-uncover-anonymous-sources/#comment-34268</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mercie]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 03:58:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonathanturley.org/?p=6903#comment-34268</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Truth and opinion are defenses to defamation--thus protecting principles of free speech.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Truth and opinion are defenses to defamation&#8211;thus protecting principles of free speech.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Copyrights &#38; Campaigns</title>
		<link>http://jonathanturley.org/2009/01/08/skanks-in-nyc-former-vogue-model-sues-google-to-uncover-anonymous-sources/#comment-34218</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Copyrights &#38; Campaigns]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 17:27:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonathanturley.org/?p=6903#comment-34218</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It is not correct to say (as does the headline of this post) that Cohen sued Google:

http://copyrightsandcampaigns.blogspot.com/2009/01/breaking-skank-update-google-was-not.html]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is not correct to say (as does the headline of this post) that Cohen sued Google:</p>
<p><a href="http://copyrightsandcampaigns.blogspot.com/2009/01/breaking-skank-update-google-was-not.html" rel="nofollow">http://copyrightsandcampaigns.blogspot.com/2009/01/breaking-skank-update-google-was-not.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lawyers Stole Kisses: Woman Continues Seven Year Fights Against Animal Shelter Confidentiality &#171; JONATHAN TURLEY</title>
		<link>http://jonathanturley.org/2009/01/08/skanks-in-nyc-former-vogue-model-sues-google-to-uncover-anonymous-sources/#comment-34182</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lawyers Stole Kisses: Woman Continues Seven Year Fights Against Animal Shelter Confidentiality &#171; JONATHAN TURLEY]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 12:12:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonathanturley.org/?p=6903#comment-34182</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...]  Recently, we have seen cases where people have fought to overcome confidentiality of reporters and Internet companies. Now, there is a raising the limits of animal shelter confidentiality. Darlene Feger is continuing [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  Recently, we have seen cases where people have fought to overcome confidentiality of reporters and Internet companies. Now, there is a raising the limits of animal shelter confidentiality. Darlene Feger is continuing [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rafflaw</title>
		<link>http://jonathanturley.org/2009/01/08/skanks-in-nyc-former-vogue-model-sues-google-to-uncover-anonymous-sources/#comment-33956</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[rafflaw]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 01:56:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonathanturley.org/?p=6903#comment-33956</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If Professor Turley is correct that Cohen is a public figure, I don&#039;t see her being able to force Google to disclose.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Professor Turley is correct that Cohen is a public figure, I don&#8217;t see her being able to force Google to disclose.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jill</title>
		<link>http://jonathanturley.org/2009/01/08/skanks-in-nyc-former-vogue-model-sues-google-to-uncover-anonymous-sources/#comment-33892</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jill]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 17:42:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonathanturley.org/?p=6903#comment-33892</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This following opinion from the article makes sense to me but I would like to hear legal and or informed opinions on this:

&quot;The law protects freedom of speech, including anonymous speech, but it doesn&#039;t protect defamation, and people should not think that they can defame others on the Internet or on blogs by hiding behind a screen name,&quot; he said.&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This following opinion from the article makes sense to me but I would like to hear legal and or informed opinions on this:</p>
<p>&#8220;The law protects freedom of speech, including anonymous speech, but it doesn&#8217;t protect defamation, and people should not think that they can defame others on the Internet or on blogs by hiding behind a screen name,&#8221; he said.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

