<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Snapped:  Rep. Peter King Introduces Bill To Require That Mobile Phones Make a Sound When Taking Pictures</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jonathanturley.org/2009/01/28/snapped-rep-peter-king-introduces-bill-to-require-that-mobile-phones-make-a-sound-when-taking-pictures/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jonathanturley.org/2009/01/28/snapped-rep-peter-king-introduces-bill-to-require-that-mobile-phones-make-a-sound-when-taking-pictures/</link>
	<description>Res ipsa loquitur (&#34;The thing itself speaks&#34;)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 May 2012 11:57:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cassandra</title>
		<link>http://jonathanturley.org/2009/01/28/snapped-rep-peter-king-introduces-bill-to-require-that-mobile-phones-make-a-sound-when-taking-pictures/#comment-36841</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cassandra]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 16:51:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonathanturley.org/?p=7563#comment-36841</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Although I agree with the commentators who are frustrated with this example of micro-legislation, I&#039;m not completely adverse to some sort of sound identifier for phone camera shots as a result of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.salon.com/mwt/feature/2008/11/25/upskirting/index.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Tracy Clark-Flory&#039;s Salon article about upskirt photographers&lt;/a&gt;. Even so, this sort of regulation would be addressed better in other places and at other times.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although I agree with the commentators who are frustrated with this example of micro-legislation, I&#8217;m not completely adverse to some sort of sound identifier for phone camera shots as a result of <a href="http://www.salon.com/mwt/feature/2008/11/25/upskirting/index.html" rel="nofollow">Tracy Clark-Flory&#8217;s Salon article about upskirt photographers</a>. Even so, this sort of regulation would be addressed better in other places and at other times.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jill</title>
		<link>http://jonathanturley.org/2009/01/28/snapped-rep-peter-king-introduces-bill-to-require-that-mobile-phones-make-a-sound-when-taking-pictures/#comment-36737</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jill]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 00:24:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonathanturley.org/?p=7563#comment-36737</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[puzzling,

We&#039;d be forced to mitigate the noise pollution!  LOL!!!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>puzzling,</p>
<p>We&#8217;d be forced to mitigate the noise pollution!  LOL!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: puzzling</title>
		<link>http://jonathanturley.org/2009/01/28/snapped-rep-peter-king-introduces-bill-to-require-that-mobile-phones-make-a-sound-when-taking-pictures/#comment-36726</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[puzzling]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 00:06:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonathanturley.org/?p=7563#comment-36726</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Perhaps Rep. King could sponsor a bill that requires a background &quot;beep&quot; when the government is monitoring your phone calls as part of dragnet surveillance?

Or a &quot;click&quot; noise that comes over your radio when your car is recorded on photo radar?

Or a &quot;read&quot; receipt when the NSA has successfully stored a copy of the email you just sent?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps Rep. King could sponsor a bill that requires a background &#8220;beep&#8221; when the government is monitoring your phone calls as part of dragnet surveillance?</p>
<p>Or a &#8220;click&#8221; noise that comes over your radio when your car is recorded on photo radar?</p>
<p>Or a &#8220;read&#8221; receipt when the NSA has successfully stored a copy of the email you just sent?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chimene</title>
		<link>http://jonathanturley.org/2009/01/28/snapped-rep-peter-king-introduces-bill-to-require-that-mobile-phones-make-a-sound-when-taking-pictures/#comment-36673</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[chimene]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 19:00:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonathanturley.org/?p=7563#comment-36673</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[and how many others had the immediate reaction -- boy, any Dudley-Do-WRONG police would love that!  would make it so much easier to locate those pesky cameras, like on the BART platform... or in less heavily-populated situations.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>and how many others had the immediate reaction &#8212; boy, any Dudley-Do-WRONG police would love that!  would make it so much easier to locate those pesky cameras, like on the BART platform&#8230; or in less heavily-populated situations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vince Treacy</title>
		<link>http://jonathanturley.org/2009/01/28/snapped-rep-peter-king-introduces-bill-to-require-that-mobile-phones-make-a-sound-when-taking-pictures/#comment-36616</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Vince Treacy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 13:36:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonathanturley.org/?p=7563#comment-36616</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think there should be a technical legal term for this type of proposal: &quot;Microlegislation.&quot;

Defined as a legislative proposal on a subject so trivial and insignificant as to be atomic in its miniscularity.

Note that microlegislation very, very seldom makes it into law.  There are too many obstacles and too much common sense around for that to happen.

It is usually issued with a burst of publicity for the guy who proposes it.

Then he and the bill then fade into obscurity after their 15 seconds of fame.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think there should be a technical legal term for this type of proposal: &#8220;Microlegislation.&#8221;</p>
<p>Defined as a legislative proposal on a subject so trivial and insignificant as to be atomic in its miniscularity.</p>
<p>Note that microlegislation very, very seldom makes it into law.  There are too many obstacles and too much common sense around for that to happen.</p>
<p>It is usually issued with a burst of publicity for the guy who proposes it.</p>
<p>Then he and the bill then fade into obscurity after their 15 seconds of fame.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sally</title>
		<link>http://jonathanturley.org/2009/01/28/snapped-rep-peter-king-introduces-bill-to-require-that-mobile-phones-make-a-sound-when-taking-pictures/#comment-36606</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sally]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 12:31:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonathanturley.org/?p=7563#comment-36606</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is yet another example of our tax dollars being completely wasted. 

I wonder who&#039;s going to be making the big bucks off a bill like this]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is yet another example of our tax dollars being completely wasted. </p>
<p>I wonder who&#8217;s going to be making the big bucks off a bill like this</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

