<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Rat Has Rights:  10-Foot Inflatable Rat Prevails in New Jersey Supreme Court</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jonathanturley.org/2009/02/06/rat/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jonathanturley.org/2009/02/06/rat/</link>
	<description>Res ipsa loquitur (&#34;The thing itself speaks&#34;)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 03:37:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: rafflaw</title>
		<link>http://jonathanturley.org/2009/02/06/rat/#comment-38186</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[rafflaw]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2009 03:09:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonathanturley.org/?p=7849#comment-38186</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lottakatz,
I am with you. The shcck of hearing that the Supremes had actually upheld a free speech right blew me away. 
Buddha,
I thought Roberts was the rat.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lottakatz,<br />
I am with you. The shcck of hearing that the Supremes had actually upheld a free speech right blew me away.<br />
Buddha,<br />
I thought Roberts was the rat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: george arnold</title>
		<link>http://jonathanturley.org/2009/02/06/rat/#comment-38182</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[george arnold]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2009 02:46:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonathanturley.org/?p=7849#comment-38182</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[11:22 GMT, Tuesday, 3 February 2009
E-mail this to a friend 	Printable version
Iran&#039;s slow but sure missile advance

By Paul Reynolds
World affairs correspondent, BBC News website

Iran&#039;s Safir rocket in August 2008
Iran said it launched a rocket capable of carrying a satellite last August

Iran&#039;s successful launch of its own satellite by its own rocket shows how it is slowly but surely mastering the missile technology that the West and Israel fear one day might be available as a delivery system for a nuclear weapon.

It also shows, as Iran itself has triumphantly proclaimed, that the UN sanctions against Iran, which include sanctions against its missile programme as well as its nuclear activities, have not stopped this event.

The satellite launch by itself, however, does not fundamentally change the equation over Iran&#039;s potential development of a nuclear weapon.

Iran continues to state that it has no intention of building a bomb and the International Atomic Energy Agency has reported that all Iran&#039;s declared nuclear enrichment activities are under its inspection.

Western governments and Israel are worried that Iran might one day use the expertise it is gaining in nuclear fuel enrichment to enrich to the higher level needed for a nuclear explosion.

Missile technology

The key element here is that Iran is steadily building up its knowledge of missile technology.
	
One concern is that the rocket used this time, the Safir 2, is basically the same as Iran&#039;s ballistic missile, the Shahab 3
Mark Fitzpatrick
International Institute for Strategic Studies

&quot;This launch represents another technological advance for Iran,&quot; says Mark Fitzpatrick, nuclear watcher at the International Institute for Strategic Studies in London.

&quot;One concern is that the rocket used this time, the Safir 2, is basically the same as Iran&#039;s ballistic missile, the Shahab 3, so each launch increases its accuracy and reliability.

&quot;However, this is not as worrisome as the launch last November of a solid fuel rocket, the Sajjil. Solid fuel missiles are more mobile and less vulnerable to pre-emptive attack.&quot;

The satellite announcement came as Iran is celebrating the 30th anniversary of its revolution.

The link between the launch and the revolution is no coincidence.

The Iranian government uses technology as a symbol of national pride.

It claims that the effort to stop it from enriching uranium is an attempt to stifle its technological progress.

Western governments have offered Iran a guaranteed supply of nuclear fuel if it will give up its own enrichment but Iran has turned down this offer.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>11:22 GMT, Tuesday, 3 February 2009<br />
E-mail this to a friend 	Printable version<br />
Iran&#8217;s slow but sure missile advance</p>
<p>By Paul Reynolds<br />
World affairs correspondent, BBC News website</p>
<p>Iran&#8217;s Safir rocket in August 2008<br />
Iran said it launched a rocket capable of carrying a satellite last August</p>
<p>Iran&#8217;s successful launch of its own satellite by its own rocket shows how it is slowly but surely mastering the missile technology that the West and Israel fear one day might be available as a delivery system for a nuclear weapon.</p>
<p>It also shows, as Iran itself has triumphantly proclaimed, that the UN sanctions against Iran, which include sanctions against its missile programme as well as its nuclear activities, have not stopped this event.</p>
<p>The satellite launch by itself, however, does not fundamentally change the equation over Iran&#8217;s potential development of a nuclear weapon.</p>
<p>Iran continues to state that it has no intention of building a bomb and the International Atomic Energy Agency has reported that all Iran&#8217;s declared nuclear enrichment activities are under its inspection.</p>
<p>Western governments and Israel are worried that Iran might one day use the expertise it is gaining in nuclear fuel enrichment to enrich to the higher level needed for a nuclear explosion.</p>
<p>Missile technology</p>
<p>The key element here is that Iran is steadily building up its knowledge of missile technology.</p>
<p>One concern is that the rocket used this time, the Safir 2, is basically the same as Iran&#8217;s ballistic missile, the Shahab 3<br />
Mark Fitzpatrick<br />
International Institute for Strategic Studies</p>
<p>&#8220;This launch represents another technological advance for Iran,&#8221; says Mark Fitzpatrick, nuclear watcher at the International Institute for Strategic Studies in London.</p>
<p>&#8220;One concern is that the rocket used this time, the Safir 2, is basically the same as Iran&#8217;s ballistic missile, the Shahab 3, so each launch increases its accuracy and reliability.</p>
<p>&#8220;However, this is not as worrisome as the launch last November of a solid fuel rocket, the Sajjil. Solid fuel missiles are more mobile and less vulnerable to pre-emptive attack.&#8221;</p>
<p>The satellite announcement came as Iran is celebrating the 30th anniversary of its revolution.</p>
<p>The link between the launch and the revolution is no coincidence.</p>
<p>The Iranian government uses technology as a symbol of national pride.</p>
<p>It claims that the effort to stop it from enriching uranium is an attempt to stifle its technological progress.</p>
<p>Western governments have offered Iran a guaranteed supply of nuclear fuel if it will give up its own enrichment but Iran has turned down this offer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lottakatz (ex labor advocate)</title>
		<link>http://jonathanturley.org/2009/02/06/rat/#comment-38179</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[lottakatz (ex labor advocate)]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2009 02:27:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonathanturley.org/?p=7849#comment-38179</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A court ruled to uphold the First Ammendment? For a union? I&#039;m amazed, just amazed. Is this worthy of a National holiday or what? ;-)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A court ruled to uphold the First Ammendment? For a union? I&#8217;m amazed, just amazed. Is this worthy of a National holiday or what? <img src='http://s1.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Appleton</title>
		<link>http://jonathanturley.org/2009/02/06/rat/#comment-38138</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike Appleton]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 23:03:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonathanturley.org/?p=7849#comment-38138</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Now the question is, who ratted out the protesters?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now the question is, who ratted out the protesters?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bron98</title>
		<link>http://jonathanturley.org/2009/02/06/rat/#comment-38133</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bron98]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 22:57:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonathanturley.org/?p=7849#comment-38133</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hoboken.

a rat with hot air? Buddha any rational thoughts?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hoboken.</p>
<p>a rat with hot air? Buddha any rational thoughts?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob, Esq.</title>
		<link>http://jonathanturley.org/2009/02/06/rat/#comment-38078</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bob, Esq.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 16:53:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonathanturley.org/?p=7849#comment-38078</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sinatra was from Jersey; right?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sinatra was from Jersey; right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Buddha Is Laughing</title>
		<link>http://jonathanturley.org/2009/02/06/rat/#comment-38066</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Buddha Is Laughing]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 15:41:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonathanturley.org/?p=7849#comment-38066</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ve heard the rat is also John Roberts preference for replacing Justice Ginsberg.  Personally, I think a giant rat full of hot air is right at home running for public office instead of seeking judicial appointment, but birds of feather . . .]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve heard the rat is also John Roberts preference for replacing Justice Ginsberg.  Personally, I think a giant rat full of hot air is right at home running for public office instead of seeking judicial appointment, but birds of feather . . .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

