Comments on: Orthodox Jewish Sex Offender Prevails In Seeking to Live Near Synagogue

By: anony.

anony. — Mon, 27 Sep 2010 00:22:14 +0000

Just remember, even if this is true, such people are 1% of 1% of the Jewish community

By: The Fallen One

The Fallen One — Tue, 28 Jul 2009 14:28:57 +0000

Residency laws are indeed unconstitutional; however, the states have used an underhanded tactic to keep this law on the books. By simply claiming these laws are REGULATORY/ CIVIL in nature, rather than PUNITIVE/ CRIMINAL, they say the US Constitution does not apply.

http://www.oncefallen.com/CivilVCriminal.html

In a constitutional argument, the state would have to prove the law works as intended and narrowly tailored to what its trying to accomplish, and residency restrictions fail on all counts. They punish a lot of innocent behavior, and studies show geography has NOTHING to do with recidivism:

http://www.oncefallen.com/ResidenceRestrictionsFacts.html

By: annecoltala

annecoltala — Fri, 19 Jun 2009 17:27:37 +0000

best! board.. Check my new Website::: Hardcore Weiber hastalavista

By: MERCIE

MERCIE — Mon, 02 Mar 2009 04:06:17 +0000

Whoops-I just realized the judge’s opinion is attached. I will read that and hopefully find some answers!

By: MERCIE

MERCIE — Mon, 02 Mar 2009 04:04:54 +0000

the law applies to all equally regardless of religion, correct? despite my feeling that way, these prohibition laws are wrong. i am not convinced their application is unconstitutional—convicted sex offenders are not a protected class. Is the constitutional argument that the prohibition is undue punishment?

By: Aunrd

Aunrd — Sun, 01 Mar 2009 21:57:21 +0000

The invisible person I believe in says I have to live over a doughnut shop and have to wear a tin foil hat. If I don’t see some tin foil and a bearclaw in this cell in 2 minutes, I’m suing!

By: Buddha Is Laughing

Buddha Is Laughing — Sun, 01 Mar 2009 15:42:21 +0000

Thank you once again, Oregon v. Smith!