Pit Bull Prohibition: Oregon Moves Toward Banning Pit Bulls

180px-ww1While it has become common for cities and counties to ban pit bulls, Oregon is considering a bill to ban the dogs from the entire state. Oregon may be the first state to declare owning pit bulls a crime, if the legislation passes.

Pit bull owners insist that their dogs are not more vicious and that it is the fault of the owners. However, the Oregon legislation may become a model for other states. While I do not expect dog smugglers to follow this prohibition, it could lead to some interesting challenges. However, such cases would likely fall under the low rational basis test for states to satisfy.

For the full story, click here.

[Update: The Oregon legislators have indicated that they may pull the bill for further study this year]

33 Responses to “Pit Bull Prohibition: Oregon Moves Toward Banning Pit Bulls”


  1. 1 Buddha Is Laughing 1, March 2, 2009 at 12:39 pm

    I’m a huge proponent of the idea that there are more bad owners than there are bad dogs, but this is an inherently dangerous breed precisely because of how they were bred. As evidenced by the CDC, they are a disproportionate risk to the public. From Wiki – “The Centers for Disease Control (CDC) published a study concerning deaths from canine attacks in 2000. According to the study, between 1979 and 1998, one-third of all fatal dog attacks were caused by Pit Bull type dogs. The highest number of attacks (118) were by Pit Bull type dogs, the next highest being Rottweilers at 67.” That’s nearly twice as many attacks as the next most aggressive breed. The original CDC report can be viewed here (.pdf) – http://www.cdc.gov/ncipc/duip/dogbreeds.pdf – but that kind of number makes it hard to argue they are not intrinsically a dangerous animal. 2:1 is statistically significant. While it makes perfect sense to let the legal onus fall on the owner for attacks, it also makes sense to ban or limit ownership of such an animal as a matter of public safety just like you would expect big cats, primates and other dangerous animals to be prohibited from private ownership.

    I love animals of all sort, but not all of them make good pets.

  2. 2 Jericho 1, March 2, 2009 at 1:11 pm

    May be correct Buddha, but isn’t thát exactly their main selling point? I don’t think too many buy them for their looks, not considering the wisdom of the buyers.

  3. 3 Sally 1, March 2, 2009 at 1:14 pm

    Let’s just make things all the more safer and ban everyone in America from owning any type of pet, except for goldfish. Then no one will get hurt.

    We can just put all the animals in a huge zoo and you can go there to see your old dog or cat and remember the good ol’ days.

    That should make things fair, right ?

  4. 4 Buddha Is Laughing 1, March 2, 2009 at 1:32 pm

    Sally,

    Please. That’s just reflexive. Not all animals are suitable pets. Keep in mind that pets, by their very nature, have to interact with more than just their “immediate family”. The owner has a responsibility to make sure the animal remains under control. The evidence points to this being a difficult to control AND dangerous breed (due to bite characteristics). Fair has nothing to do with it, safe does. I’d love to be able to have a Siberian Tiger as a pet. Beautiful animal. But I wouldn’t do it. Forget that it’s cruel to keep a wild animal as a pet. Forget that it’s illegal in many places. I wouldn’t do it for the assumed risk alone. Even if that tiger LOVED me and I was fully confident it would not harm a hair on my head, I could never be sure it wouldn’t take exception to another human and attack. It’s his nature. To quote Chris Rock, “That tiger didn’t go crazy! That tiger went tiger!” Just like aggression is the nature of pit bulls as evidence by their frequency in being involved in fatal attacks. I’m not suggesting people get their pets taken away. That’s just mean. I’m suggesting not allowing any more of the breed into circulation. How is that not fair?

  5. 5 Sally 1, March 2, 2009 at 2:23 pm

    I’ll admit Buddha, there are certain types of dogs that I don’t like, most of them are those little bitty yappy ones.
    I’m not fond of pit bulls or german shepherds either. I do feel that both of those types of dogs are agressive.

    A friend of ours used to have a german shepherd that was extremely protective of her. Then she and I each had a baby and of course, the dog became protective of her son. I always feared that the dog would attack my daughter if she took a toy away from her son and made him cry. So to avoid such a problem, the dog not was near the children when they were playing. The dog died shortly before our kids each turned one year old. Although I was sad for my friends loss, I was secretly relieved.

    I do see your point though

  6. 6 puzzling 1, March 2, 2009 at 2:34 pm

    If breeders created a Pit-weilers or Dober-bulls, would they be legal under this proposal?

    Or will the courts know it when they see it?

    I think another avenue would be to compel homeowners to carry $2M in liability insurance to get a pet registration for a Pit Bull, thereby making registration nearly impossible.

  7. 7 Former Federal LEO 1, March 2, 2009 at 3:14 pm

    Although I never tried training a pit bull, I have little doubt that I could train one to be as gentle as I wanted and still be an effective watchdog. A dog’s personality most often reflects that of his trainer and/or owner.

    Bear in mind the nature/nurture aspect of behavior when considering whether a particular breed of animal is doomed to certain *undesirable* traits.

    Every breed of dog has intrinsic value and must have every opportunity to exist. The owners are the responsible parties in this human/non-human animal partnership that has culturally evolved over some 14, 000 years.

  8. 8 Gyges 1, March 2, 2009 at 3:43 pm

    I think we can all agree that there are several layers to this problem: Owners who have little to no experience with a more protective\aggressive dog breeds; owners who try to bring out the aggressiveness so they can use the animal as a guard dog, but don’t know enough to train the dog properly; backyard breeders who either have low breeding standards or try to cater those seeking junkyard dogs. When you combine bad breeders with bad owners, and pit bulls seem to attract both, you’re always going to end up with a breed that gets known for having many undesirable traits.

  9. 9 faderalcodo33093 1, March 2, 2009 at 7:42 pm

    Yes, Virginia, we now have a President Doofus:

    ‘Fuzzy Math’ on War Funding.

    Obama Begs Moscow “We will scrap missile-defense for help with Iran”.

    Dow drops another 300 points; off 2,500 just since Obama inaugeration, 3,500 since Obama election, and 6,500 since Obama nomination – investor message – WE DON’T TRUST or BELIEVE IN Obama’s fruitcake answer to our problems.

  10. 10 The Clinger 1, March 3, 2009 at 2:46 am

    Budda
    “I’m a huge proponent of the idea that there are more bad owners than there are bad dogs”
    One could make the same statement about parents, auto drivers, bicycle riders, buffalo owners, rodeo livestock owners, Boer hog owners (they can run faster than a horse(so says my dad)), Billy goat owners, and I could go on and on. Just where do you stop protecting the public and suggest the individual has some responsibility for his own protection. But at that suggestion you would not be involved. Is that not the real issue???

    “We can just put all the animals in a huge zoo and you can go there to see your old dog or cat and remember the good ol’ days.” But Sally??? What about those drunk Mary Jane smoking dudes that climb the fence and then get eaten by the zoo animals… No zoos??? Gotta keep the natives safe??? Whata ya call that one for the tort lawyers… Not zoo ambulance chasers but funeral parlor opportunities???
    http://forums.mercurynews.com/topic/san-jose-family-of-teen-killed-by-tiger-sues-san-francisco-zoo
    Survival of the smartest or is that the thinkinst???
    Learned the reality of that from Bullet my neighbors collie named after I seem to recall Roy Rogers collie after I antagonized him and he grabbed me and pulled me outa the tree I had climbed which bent over from my weight where he could reach me after I antagonized him. Got the scars still.. And he licked me in the face when he hung on and pulled me outta the tree after all that… With me a bleeding too, crying and screaming bloody murder… He missed the family jewels that I had no clue I would later for sure learn so really appreciate… Whewwww… Since then I ALWAYS carry big boneS in my pocket when biking and ah walkin to have POSITIVE influence with all the big dogs…. Littlins ones too…. They can get it to ya bike spokes… Kinda sounding like the survival of the fittest/thinkinst(my word)???

  11. 11 zenyenta 1, March 3, 2009 at 1:22 pm

    I think something should be done for the dogs’ own good. We’ve been looking to adopt a dog and the shelters around here are overflowing with unwanted pits and pit mixes. They far outnumber any other type of breed or mix in need of homes and they seem to either be bred or allowed to breed way in excess of any demand for them. Add to that the fact that homeowners insurance will often penalize you for owning a pit or certain other breeds and they’d be better off if there were fewer of them in the future.

  12. 12 Thomas von der Trave 1, March 3, 2009 at 7:22 pm

    How long till they ban ALL scary-looking potentially aggressive breeds? Dobermans, Rottweilers, Mastiffs, German Shepherds, you name it. And what breeds are NOT potentially dangerous? For Pete’s sake, former French President Chirac recently had to be hospitalized after being mauled by his tiny pet Maltese poodle: http://tinyurl.com/7ts93c. The doggy was “clinically depressed”.

    People, it’s the training, not the “breeding”, that makes an aggressive dog. A Pit Bull raised like a Cocker Spaniel will be as sweet-tempered as you please. Maybe more so; I’ve known some nasty little Cockers.

    They’re going for the easy solution here, banning the breed instead of keeping an eye on the breeders/trainers. If my super-friendly Korean Jindo goes nuts and bites a kid I’m liable, just like a Pit Bull owner. There should be no general verbot.

    It’s a similar picture with gun ownership. A semi-automatic rifle that looks like your grandfather’s deer gun works exactly the same way as a semi-auto AK-47 (full auto guns are already illegal unless you jump through some very tight hoops, and no, contrary to urban myth it’s NOT easy to convert from semi to full). But there’s again a move afoot to ban so-called “assault rifles” primarily because they LOOK sinister. Yet I can assault you just as effectively with a gun that looks like it should be hanging over a rustic mantelpiece.

    Let’s get away from simplistic solutions that go by appearances. There are many responsible Pit Bull owners with perfectly behaved dogs right here in my neighborhood. The Nanny State should worry less about breeds or gun styles and – well, in fact, the Nanny State should just go away and stop trying to protect everybody from everything. Life is risky. Get used to it.

  13. 13 Buddha Is Laughing 1, March 3, 2009 at 7:32 pm

    2:1

    What? A Rot can’t do the job?

  14. 14 Sally 1, March 5, 2009 at 7:45 pm

    Here’s a sad story about dogs attacking people….
    This one is about a chow attacking a two week old baby

    http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/29530295/

  15. 15 Brenda Gutierrez 1, April 1, 2009 at 9:01 pm

    you people who defend these blood-thirsty dogs from Hell make me want to just PUKE!How many people have to die or be permantly disfugered by this pyschotic breed,How many innocent animals have to die at the hand of these monsters till they are banned?It is always a pitbull doing it!Nine out of ten fatal dog attacks are pitbulls.They are proving their own reputation.Incidently Sally since you seem to be their fan,I hope you come acroo one.Maybe you’ll lose that stupid arrogance!It’s people like you that make this country as screwed up as it is!

  16. 16 TYLER HARGROVE 1, April 13, 2009 at 6:04 pm

    OK BRENDA BUT LETS MAKE A COMPARISON ABOUT HOW MANY OF THOSE 9 OUT OF 10 ATTACKS ARE DO TO POOR TRAINING AND IRRESPONSIBILITY ON THE OWNERS PART. HOW MANY WERE DO SIMPLY TO NEGLECT OR ABUSE. LETS ABUSE YOU FOR A LITTLE WHILE, MAYBE MAIM YOU, STARVE YOU, BEAT YOU UNTIL YOU BECOME CRAZY AND HURT SOMEONE. THEN JUST FOR KICKS LETS BAN WHATEVER RACE YOU ARE BECAUSE YOU’RE AS OF NOW “DANGEROUS”. THAT WILL BE REALLY FUN. YOU AND THE REST OF THE WORLD COULD HAVE A HELL OF A TIME TRYING TO FIGHT THAT.
    I PERSONALLY OWNED TWO, YES TWO MALE PITS IN THE SAME HOME. FOR A DOG THAT IS SUPPOSEDLY AGGRESSIVE TO OTHER BREEDS, IT WAS NOT. URINATION ON OR NEAR EACH OTHER TO SEE WHO WAS MORE DOMINANT WAS AS FAR AS IT EVER GOT. WE ALSO HAD 3 CHILDREN ALL TEENAGERS LIVING IN THE HOME. ALL WHOM HAD FRIENDS COMING AND GOING. JUST YOUR TYPICAL FUN LOVING FRIENDLY ENVIRONMENT WITH 2 PITBULLS HANGING OUT WHILE PLAYING XBOX.

  17. 17 lauri bell 1, May 21, 2009 at 9:22 am

    Do we all need to be reminded of the micheal vic case? Out of all the dogs that were confiscated, only ONE had to be euthanized (and that was because she was so far gone with cancer that it would have been cruel to keep her alive). All of these dogs were, YES, rehabilitated and adopted out to homes with children, other dogs and cats. These were deemed “fighting dogs”, and under other counties and cities “bans” would have been all put to death! Some of these dogs even went to DEA and Search and Rescue organizations as well as becoming therapy dogs for the elder and disabled community. I have owned and been part of this spectacular breed for many years and would not own any other dog. I find it crazy that people go on and on about what the dog was “bred” for. If you do your research, the dogs were originally bred for hunting, not fighting. They are in fact, still used today in many areas for what they were intentionally meant for which is mainly bear and boar hunting! They as well do NOT have “locking jaws”, but more pounds per square inch bite force than other breeds (although they did a study for national geographic with three breeds, a german shephard, rottwiler and pitbull, and the german had MORE bite force than the pit bull, the pitbull coming in last)! So what I am saying in closing is “knowledge is power”!

  18. 18 Buddha Is Laughing 1, May 21, 2009 at 10:24 am

    2:1

  19. 19 MOMMALEO 1, August 14, 2009 at 4:39 pm

    I just want to say that I own two American Pit Bull Terriers, and I also have 6 small children and another on the way. My dogs are very sweet, and loving to everyone they come in contact with. They have been trained to be that way. My daughter got bit by a blue heeler when she was 1, at the play ground because, well the dog wasn’t a “pit bull” so the owners let their dog just run loose. I didn’t even get an apology from the dog owners. Both of my dogs have been attacked by other dogs in the town I live in, while they we’re being walked, on a leash by my husband. Both seperate incidents, and all of these dogs we’re different dogs, and all of them running loose because how could they be dangerous, they aren’t pit bulls. My dogs did nothing back to these other dogs, they just kind of looked confused. Again, no one in my town thinks that it’s a big deal because they couldn’t possibly hurt anyone because they aren’t pits. I am tired of the ignorance that people have towards these dogs. Like Laurie Bell wrote, please remember the Michael Vick dogs. I am so proud and happy that they we’re all re homed! I knew they would be, because I know the breed. My moms little mini dachsund has bitten my daughter. My dogs get down on their bellies when people come up to them. They are sitting pretty waiting to be loved on. People who are responsible for aggressive dogs, of any breed, need to be held responsible for their actions. I wish everyone would stop trying to make this breed responsible for their own ignorance. This breed, like any other will be as loving as we allow them to be. They are big goof balls! Don’t get me wrong, if either of my dogs attacked someone, I would put them down, but that can happen with any animal, dog, cat, bird, horse, whatever animal you may own. Knowledge is power, and a lot of people in this world need to learn more about this breed. Also, a lot of “pit bull” attacks, aren’t even really pit bulls. There are a lot of breeds that look similar to pits. Mine are UKC registered, Purple Ribbon dogs, so I know they are APBT. So the statistics aren’t completely accurate on how many attacks are really Pits.

  20. 20 Emmy 1, October 14, 2009 at 2:17 pm

    My son was bit in the face by a rotwieler he was at the sitter’s house i was at work. it was a 8 month old pup that was kept in a dinky apt. with a bunch of wild kids. my son was only 3 at the time he didnt know your not supposed to put your face by them when they are eating. Of course he needed stitches was very lucky it just missed his eyeball and he has gaping scars by his eye socket and his cheek and chin. i find that 90 percent of owners that get these dogs do nothing to discipline them they don’t study the breeds and they don’t understand how to train them. This leads to the dog taking charge instead of the owner due to boredom from lack of exercise and uselessness from having no job or purpose, big dogs need to keep busy, period! if you dont have the time dont buy the dang dog.

  21. 21 Emmy 1, October 14, 2009 at 2:23 pm

    just to edit that the sitter i took him to didnt own the dog it was brought over by her older daughter i was not aware of the arrangement. I did take them to court for medical expenses and to pay for future surgery and it took 3years to settle. ya know when ppl fight each other one or the other or both go to jail there is usually fines to pay and court costs etc..but humans have the capacity to decide whether to engage in the fight, dogs don’t. So to say that its the owners isn’t entirely a fair assesment. Who do you blame if the owners are responsible? Thats why if you aren’t sure you can handle the consequences if your dog has an episode whether financially or emotionally then really consider that no matter what breed you buy.

  22. 22 president obama 1, February 8, 2010 at 5:21 pm

    I am the President! Pit Bulls Will Be forced into instinction within the nex week. Thanks and good nite my fellow americans.

  23. 23 empirecookie 1, February 8, 2010 at 5:34 pm

    Mr. President:

    Pit bulls will be forced to have natural or innate impulses? Isn’t that a contradiction in terms?

    And all by next week?

    That’s so awesome, but do you think you could do something about DADT or health care instead?

  24. 24 Buddha Is Laughing 1, February 8, 2010 at 5:47 pm

    Health care is going to be forced into instinction?

    Now that’ll be something to see. I better set the DVR.

  25. 25 Buddha Is Laughing 1, February 8, 2010 at 5:53 pm

    Did I mention the pit bull breed is involved in fatal attacks two times for every one attack by the next most vicious breed (Rotweiller)?

    2:1

    If your car was twice as likely to explode when you ride in it as the next relevant competition, would it make sense to keep the car? If so, please call me. I have some vintage Ford Pintos in mint condition to sell you.

  26. 26 empirecookie 1, February 8, 2010 at 5:54 pm

    I think that might have been 43 attempting to impersonate 44.

  27. 27 Byron 1, February 8, 2010 at 6:13 pm

    Buddha:

    every pit bull I know that is just brought up as a regular dog is very loving.

    I think the problem is not the design but how it is used.

  28. 28 Canadian Eh 1, February 8, 2010 at 6:22 pm

    Pit Bull breeding has been banned in Ontario for the past 3 years. In addition, if you are the proud owner of the breed and are out walking it without a muzzle you will be fined and your pet could be taken away on the spot.

  29. 29 Jacob 1, March 6, 2011 at 6:38 pm

    I just want to say to all of the people who are in support of all of this pit bull or breed specific legislation. You clearly don’t have a clue what yo are talking about and your ignorance is apparent. Your living out of fear and that is driving your viewpoint. I have been raising these dogs and have been a breeder of them. In the entire time I have been working with them I have not ever once had an issue with these dogs. In fact I trust them more than most other breeds. It is not the dog that is bad, it is the owner that neglects a dog or mistreats the dog. These are amazing animals and are considered members of the family. You are talking about taking peoples family members away from them and killing them, imprisoning the owners and so forth. This is wrong.
    Hey you there, the one all for restricting me from owning a perfectly good and loyal dog. What if your child grew up and was violent. Is the next step to ban people from having children because people have this inherent ability to loose it when they don’t get their medication, or they are drunk. it really is no different. We don’t ban you from having a child because your a bad parent. People are prosecuted on an individual basis, and so should a persons animal. Does the CDC (who has no place dictating anything of this nature) do a study on different nationalities and declaring that certain races of human are more disposed to violence and therefor banned or sterilized. You people should get a clue before you start judging animals in which the extent of your knowledge is from new reports and isolated incidents.

  30. 30 shelby 1, June 20, 2011 at 7:11 pm

    To the last person who commented on this website. You posted that u agree with most owners are responsible for the way that the dog is treated or otherwise raised. U also stated that rottweilers are bumber on the list most dangerous dogs. I have a rottie mix. He is 1/2 rottie 1/4 chocolate lab adn 1/4 saint bernard. He is the most wonderful loveable dong i have ever had teh pleasure of owning. He was raised well and he is very smart. So if a rottie can be trained well then why cant a pitbull be trained well? My cousin has a pur breed pitbull and she has never bitten anyone or tried to bit anyone even wen she did have puppies to protect. they have 4 pits adn every single one of them are very nice adn obediant dongs. Yes some can be taught to be mean, but that is only because they are people pleasers adn want to please thier owners. If you want the dog to be a fighter he will try his hardest to be one and kill. If u want the dog to be nice and be able to have a 2 year old play with him and not relatiate then u would raise him as a good love albe dog. i think that people who want to ban this breed are crazy and will just cause more harm then good. It would be like the 70′s with drugs. Once you ban it, it gives people the more of a feeling of wanting than anything. Once u tell someone they ant have soemthing or cant do something the first thing they are going to so is prove u wrong. So i think that banning people to have pits would be better than just banning the breed. Maybe setting up classes and then having a certificate or somthing that says that u may own a pitbull. Just like driving without a lisence. same concept.

  31. 31 guest 1, August 16, 2011 at 11:54 pm

    Actually Pitbulls have tested better than labs on temperment test Buddha. A true pit is not aggressive towards humans (they were actually made so that they would not be that way. Not only that but if you did your research, you would find that the only way to see if it was a pit that did attack, they would have to do blood work, which they don’t. So they are only classified according to their looks.

  32. 32 chassie808 1, September 19, 2011 at 2:08 am

    i have one female pit bull and one chihuahua…shes the biggest baby you’ll ever meet. shes a protective dog but also lovable..Our chihuahua is more over protective then our pit. I have 4 kids all close in ages from 0-7 years old and our pit loves them dearly. She never shows aggresion towars our kids or towards us. It all depends on how the owner trains them. Its just like teaching kids from right and wrong. When we take her to the dog park, she does not go nuts! shes friendly and very mellow. You show them aggresion and anger and discipline them with thoughs feelings, they’ll follow in those feelings. But if you show them love and compassion, they’ll act on that. Yes pit bulls comes off as being a dominate breed. BUT NOT ALL OF THEM LIVE OFF OF THAT! =) SO STOP LOOKING ON ONE SIDE OF THE STORY. THERE ARE PIT BULLS SUCH AS MINE THAT ARE LOVING AND HUMBLE PETS THAT IS APART OF OUR FAMILY. WHY BLAME THEM ON THEIR OWNERS ACTIONS. ITS JUST LIKE BLAMING YOUR KIDS MISTAKES AND MESS UPS ON HOW YOU DISCIPLINE AND TEACH THEM!!!

  33. 33 puzzling 1, September 19, 2011 at 8:23 am

    Chassie,

    My guess is that you’re motivated to write because you have some self-doubt about whether or not it’s appropriate to have four kids under 7 years old and a pit bull in the house. Statistically, you’re taking a much greater risk of injury or death of one of your children and their friends than if you had a retriever, say. If it were me I would give up the dog in your situation.

    For more on the realities of these risks, see here.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

Gravatar
WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s




Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Turley Tweets

Click here to follow the blog on Twitter.

SELECTED AS TOP LEGAL OPINION BLOG (2011)

SELECTED AS TOP LEGAL THEORY AND LAW PROFESSOR BLOG (2008)

blawg100_2008_winner9349c7

Winner — Top Opinion Writer By Aspen Institute and The Week Magazine for Best Single-Issue Advocacy (Civil Liberties)

Categories

Archives


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 595 other followers