Comments on: Federal Judge Chastises Harvard Professor Charles Nesson For Effort to Hold Deposition In a Classroom

By: tcnyocwwsj

tcnyocwwsj — Sun, 24 May 2009 06:07:46 +0000

loFnrO pnbtfuuxfriz, [url=http://crthxgzcftul.com/]crthxgzcftul[/url], [link=http://rruruabceigd.com/]rruruabceigd[/link], http://tbiteagewnaw.com/

By: Bob, Esq.

Bob, Esq. — Sat, 14 Mar 2009 19:31:26 +0000

“You’re doubling down right?”

Nah, just failing to correct a typo before posting.

By: CCD

CCD — Fri, 13 Mar 2009 01:53:41 +0000

Nice catch and release BIL. The funk balances against the lives examined here.

By: Buddha Is Laughing

Buddha Is Laughing — Thu, 12 Mar 2009 22:45:44 +0000

This is kind of interesting. A buddy showed me this article after a meeting this afternoon. He’s an IT and music geek, but the link to the song “mash up” the article references is actually quite good. The blog entry that linked to it though is squarely about IP.

http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=09/03/12/1429234

By: CCD

CCD — Thu, 12 Mar 2009 19:51:27 +0000

Bob, Esq.

You’re doubling down right?

By: Bron98

Bron98 — Thu, 12 Mar 2009 19:08:27 +0000

it’s only intellectual property when the corporations are getting the shaft.

By: Bob, Esq.

Bob, Esq. — Thu, 12 Mar 2009 16:19:49 +0000

Isn’t Nesson the Law Prof from Harvard that’s been advocating the use of poker skills as a means of improving litigation skills?

By: Bob, Esq.

Bob, Esq. — Thu, 12 Mar 2009 16:19:43 +0000

Isn’t Nesson the Law Prof from Harvord that’s been advocating the use of poker skills as a means of improving litigation skills?

By: Buddha Is Laughing

Buddha Is Laughing — Thu, 12 Mar 2009 12:01:13 +0000

I’m going to have to side with the judge on this one. I wish Prof. Nesson the best of luck against the RIAA. They are systemic abusers who should be taken to task for their strong arm tactics and are solely responsible for my shift away from a strict adherence policy regarding IP. The RIAA are Corporate Goons – they don’t represent artists. They represent the people in the music publishing business that are more concerned with maintaining a monopoly on distribution instead of building new business models to cope with changing technology. And they did it to themselves. “Yes, we’ll lower CD costs!” never happened. When CD burners became as ubiquitous as toasters, people figured out that what they were paying $15-25 for costs only pennies to manufacture. Combine this with the new media savvy the internet engendered educating the populace that most of that money spent on CD’s never reached the artists, but only perpetuated the Industry Bureaucracy, the consumer rebelled. Sucks to be you, RIAA, but Radiohead is way ahead of your Business School types on what technology is capable of. Bands make the majority of their money by touring. If they can get their music out to create fans, e.g. customers, for those shows without having to pay you scumbags who quite frankly act like the Mafia enforcing their vig, more power to the artists. They do the hard work. You’re just middle men. But I digress. None of the RIAA’s thuggish tactics should be an excuse for or change the fact that a “live” deposition is just asking for trouble. Too many unknowns that could disrupt a key discovery process.