<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Progeny Product:  Federal Court Rules that Product Liability Covers Defective Sperm</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jonathanturley.org/2009/04/03/progeny-product-federal-court-rules-that-product-liability-covers-defective-sperm/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jonathanturley.org/2009/04/03/progeny-product-federal-court-rules-that-product-liability-covers-defective-sperm/</link>
	<description>Res ipsa loquitur (&#34;The thing itself speaks&#34;)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 21:33:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: SlipperyOne</title>
		<link>http://jonathanturley.org/2009/04/03/progeny-product-federal-court-rules-that-product-liability-covers-defective-sperm/#comment-46309</link>
		<dc:creator>SlipperyOne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2009 21:07:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonathanturley.org/?p=9631#comment-46309</guid>
		<description>As a progeny of the Arian movement, I offer my services for free. 

ONLY KIDDING. 

I have to be bought dinner first.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a progeny of the Arian movement, I offer my services for free. </p>
<p>ONLY KIDDING. </p>
<p>I have to be bought dinner first.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bron98</title>
		<link>http://jonathanturley.org/2009/04/03/progeny-product-federal-court-rules-that-product-liability-covers-defective-sperm/#comment-46196</link>
		<dc:creator>Bron98</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2009 23:54:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonathanturley.org/?p=9631#comment-46196</guid>
		<description>last part wrong thread sorry</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>last part wrong thread sorry</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bron98</title>
		<link>http://jonathanturley.org/2009/04/03/progeny-product-federal-court-rules-that-product-liability-covers-defective-sperm/#comment-46195</link>
		<dc:creator>Bron98</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2009 23:53:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonathanturley.org/?p=9631#comment-46195</guid>
		<description>Buddha:

my wife went to UVA at the same time one of HW&#039;s sons was there.  She was in a class with this guys future wife and could not stand her.  She has the same opinion you have of the Bush&#039;s.  If you want a real Bush genius though check out the other Bush that looks sort of like W, I think its Neil.  He reminds me of the Steve Martin character Rupreck in Dirty Rotten Scoundrels (a classic if I do say so) and his son is a piece of work too.  Fuck, I must be a closet liberal, hopefully it is the Jefforsonian variety.

On the failure to perform if the guy gave it the old college try is he obligated?  This also sounds like a latent defect, he did not know he was shooting blanks.  Can a consumer recover from the seller if the seller dosent know the item was defective?  Isnt this a case of caveat humpedher?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Buddha:</p>
<p>my wife went to UVA at the same time one of HW&#8217;s sons was there.  She was in a class with this guys future wife and could not stand her.  She has the same opinion you have of the Bush&#8217;s.  If you want a real Bush genius though check out the other Bush that looks sort of like W, I think its Neil.  He reminds me of the Steve Martin character Rupreck in Dirty Rotten Scoundrels (a classic if I do say so) and his son is a piece of work too.  Fuck, I must be a closet liberal, hopefully it is the Jefforsonian variety.</p>
<p>On the failure to perform if the guy gave it the old college try is he obligated?  This also sounds like a latent defect, he did not know he was shooting blanks.  Can a consumer recover from the seller if the seller dosent know the item was defective?  Isnt this a case of caveat humpedher?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Buddha Is Laughing</title>
		<link>http://jonathanturley.org/2009/04/03/progeny-product-federal-court-rules-that-product-liability-covers-defective-sperm/#comment-46186</link>
		<dc:creator>Buddha Is Laughing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2009 21:39:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonathanturley.org/?p=9631#comment-46186</guid>
		<description>If this case finds that defective sperm is equivalent to defective product, should We the People sue the Bush family?  Defective is defective, middle man or not, and liability should trace to the manufacturer.  And how about those defective eggs while we&#039;re at it?  Surely Babs bears some responsibility for their treasonous traitorous venal hellspawn.

Junior is a case where defect won&#039;t be hard to argue.  Just look at the boy and you can tell he ain&#039;t right.  And check out the jughead on Jeb!  Let&#039;s not forget the insipid half-witted girls.  Just what the world doesn&#039;t need - more Bush breeders.  There&#039;s not only no lifeguard in the Bush gene pool.  Someone&#039;s dumping lead and mercury into the water.  Possibly peeing in it too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If this case finds that defective sperm is equivalent to defective product, should We the People sue the Bush family?  Defective is defective, middle man or not, and liability should trace to the manufacturer.  And how about those defective eggs while we&#8217;re at it?  Surely Babs bears some responsibility for their treasonous traitorous venal hellspawn.</p>
<p>Junior is a case where defect won&#8217;t be hard to argue.  Just look at the boy and you can tell he ain&#8217;t right.  And check out the jughead on Jeb!  Let&#8217;s not forget the insipid half-witted girls.  Just what the world doesn&#8217;t need &#8211; more Bush breeders.  There&#8217;s not only no lifeguard in the Bush gene pool.  Someone&#8217;s dumping lead and mercury into the water.  Possibly peeing in it too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Buddha Is Laughing</title>
		<link>http://jonathanturley.org/2009/04/03/progeny-product-federal-court-rules-that-product-liability-covers-defective-sperm/#comment-46111</link>
		<dc:creator>Buddha Is Laughing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2009 11:28:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonathanturley.org/?p=9631#comment-46111</guid>
		<description>This will be interesting to see unfold.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This will be interesting to see unfold.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Spindell</title>
		<link>http://jonathanturley.org/2009/04/03/progeny-product-federal-court-rules-that-product-liability-covers-defective-sperm/#comment-46084</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Spindell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 23:47:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonathanturley.org/?p=9631#comment-46084</guid>
		<description>Thus begins the spate of lawsuits, laws and arguments that are sure to follow our discoveries and explorations of genetics. The scope of this whole field has me concerned and I don&#039;t think anyone has figured out how to handle it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thus begins the spate of lawsuits, laws and arguments that are sure to follow our discoveries and explorations of genetics. The scope of this whole field has me concerned and I don&#8217;t think anyone has figured out how to handle it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob, Esq.</title>
		<link>http://jonathanturley.org/2009/04/03/progeny-product-federal-court-rules-that-product-liability-covers-defective-sperm/#comment-46055</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob, Esq.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 18:35:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonathanturley.org/?p=9631#comment-46055</guid>
		<description>Somehow I don&#039;t see the NYS Court of Appeals agreeing with this holding. 

Wonder where that would leave the case procedurally</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Somehow I don&#8217;t see the NYS Court of Appeals agreeing with this holding. </p>
<p>Wonder where that would leave the case procedurally</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
