Comments on: Judge Samuel Kent Sentenced to 33 Months in Federal Prison

By: Buddha Is Laughing

Buddha Is Laughing — Sat, 20 Jun 2009 02:48:02 +0000

Excellent.

By: Anonymously Yours

Anonymously Yours — Sat, 20 Jun 2009 02:46:38 +0000

Jonathan

UPDATE

Link: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/06/19/judge-samuel-kent-impeach_n_218230.html

Judge Samuel Kent Impeached By House

By: Smiley

Smiley — Sat, 20 Jun 2009 02:40:59 +0000

Whether Republican or Democrat the judge admitted his guilt as part of a plea bargain. He should be impeached, removed and all pay, along with any retirement be forfeited. He should also have to adhere to the rules for sexual predators by having to check in with police departments for the rest of his life.

You would think by the lack of reference to a party affiliation that he would be a Democrat. However, Harry Reid wants to set up a special investigation group, and go forward with this matter. Probably the judge is a Republican. However, it really doesn’t matter, if he is a Republican he will be impeached. If he is a Democrat he will get a good old boy slap on the back, his retirement intact and a promotion when he get out of prison, after the 33 month visit.

We all know this and it should come as no surprise to anyone.

By: lance

lance — Fri, 19 Jun 2009 22:18:20 +0000

I agree typical democrat liberal democrat move, don’t publish party affiliation. Liberals are only liberal with everyone else stuff and rights not there own. Such hypocrites. Now we shall see about this new latina dem that is about to be appointed to the supreme court. I’m glad my life is almost over. This country has gone to crap with all of this liberal bull.

By: Jack

Jack — Wed, 17 Jun 2009 14:43:47 +0000

To assume he is a republican b/c he was appointed by Bush (the elder) is erroneous. Reagan nominated Ginsburg to the Supreme Court and she’s not a republican. I have to agree with Alex, …it’s always a Democrat when they leave off party affiliation.

By: Disenfranchised and Disgusted in MN

Disenfranchised and Disgusted in MN — Fri, 05 Jun 2009 05:21:40 +0000

Thank you, “anonymously yours” for your wit, as well as, your intelligent rendering of logic and reason. As this judge continued to collect tax payer money in the light of current fiscal difficulties it is not hard to see why regular, moral, hard working folks are appalled at the abuse of power running rampant. As they fight for this man to receive retirement so that he may continue to receive his pay in the aftermath of his inexcusable shame, I can assure you that if any other “average American” were to be accused of such misconduct we would not be afforded such pleasantries. As a taxpayer and citizen (and indirectly the judge’s boss/employer) this is unconscionable and unacceptable. By all means he should be impeached by whatever means necessary. The judge should consider himself fortunate his sentence was so lenient and stand as a lesson to those who choose to abuse the power and trust granted them by the Americans they serve.

By: molljdev

molljdev — Thu, 04 Jun 2009 03:44:15 +0000

Duh. The good judge is indeed a raging republican. Another Bush appointee………do as I say, not as I do type. Typical republican.

By: Tio Wally

Tio Wally — Tue, 12 May 2009 07:23:10 +0000

Thank God, Justice is blind. I don’t know what we’d do if she had one eye open.

By: Anonymously Yours

Anonymously Yours — Tue, 12 May 2009 02:47:10 +0000

alex,

I presume you are a Troll Tramp. If you had bothered to read the article you would have found out that the Molester was appointed by GHW Bush aka 41 aka GeoI or you could have deducted the number of years he had been on the bench from the present year, thereby figuring out what year his confirmation was heard. But then again your master may not be able to cipher either.

What do you think? Opps excuse me, I am in violation of the ADA because I asked you to do something you clearly are incapable of doing at this time.

I apologize in advance for offending you.

By: alex

alex — Tue, 12 May 2009 02:38:10 +0000

Must be a Democrat because the article doesn’t state his political preference…it’s always a Democrat when they leave off party affiliation.

By: Anonymously Yours

Anonymously Yours — Tue, 12 May 2009 02:07:30 +0000

And to top this off, he will not get his salary while he is incarcerated it will be redirected to the government. This will off set the cost. Where do I sign the petition to have impeachment and disbarment proceeding commence?

For those of you that like to point out a lot of flakes are in Texas missed this one.

By: Former Federal LEO

Former Federal LEO — Mon, 11 May 2009 22:52:44 +0000

From the link:

{Quote: Rather than resigning, he has asked Judge Edith Jones, chief judge of the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, to grant him the early retirement so he can keep getting his pay for life. Jones would not comment for this story on Kent’s request or whether the judicial council has met or will meet on Kent’s case.

Members of Congress are poised to seek Kent’s impeachment End Quote}

By: CharlesC

CharlesC — Mon, 11 May 2009 22:33:40 +0000

Apparently this isn’t enough to be impeached either?