you definitely are not a conservative and you certainly don’t advocate liberal economic policies. What philosophy do you adhere to? You definitely have a unified philosophical outlook on everything I have read that you have written.

Libertarian comes to mind as does the hated “she devil”. Or is there some other basis for your thinking?

Yes – I agree with you that there are more abortions as a result of the government limits on compensation to biological parents. Many would otherwise choose to deliver the child and give it up for adoption.

Thank you for the question. I see the power of government as particularly dangerous to children and view its application with real skepticism. From protecting outrageous assaults on children by parents (under the guise of discipline and parental rights) to coerced participation in poorly run government educational systems, many government policies are clearly harmful to children. Sadly, many fail to see that less government may in fact be part of the long-term solutions for these problems.

so what you are saying is that government, through a manipulation of market forces, is responsible for abortion?

You may be on to something there, if you can get $10,000 – $20,000 or more for a baby or pay $500 to $1,000 for an abortion what would most people do? I am guessing they would have the child and put it up for adoption.

However at some point the price of babies would come down as market forces increased supply.

So by interfering with market forces government has actually and unwittingly increased the number of abortions.

Puzzling where do you come up with this stuff? You sir/madam are a real thinker.

This government policy stops a mother from receiving compensation even if she believes it is in both the interest of herself, her child, and the adoptive parents to relinquish her custody of the child.

As a result there will always be a shortage of children to adopt. Biological parents who would otherwise be incentivized to give up children they may not want have this incentive stripped away by government.

It is this government policy that has created a vicious and growing black market for children, and draconian and absurd tests (like tests on sexual orientation) on prospective adoptive parents.

Government policy limiting compensation in adoptions risks the lives of children, harms mothers, and denies children to willing, qualified parents.

“AY–

Glad you’re around to answer my rhetorical questions. BYT, one wouldn’t want to forget Vlad the Impaler!”

Ok, stealing the fat mans line: One lives to be of service.
Me: rhetorical questions answered: First Answer is free. In the future, I prefer an hourly rate as opposed to a contingency fee agreement in matter such as these.

Now one would not want to forget other minor leaders such as John Gotti, Dalhmer, Bundy, the Roman Catholic Church, The Roman Empire, etc.

Glad you’re around to answer my rhetorical questions. BYT, one wouldn’t want to forget Vlad the Impaler!

How evil can a human get?
*************

Me think’s you are not really a schoolmarm. You have heard of Stalin, Hilter? Bush and Cheney?

The above was meant only as humor and I understand what was stated.

Am I still stoned after all these years? Nah, I am not in Somalia but still the same. Did someone hit me in the head with a rock or board, this just does not make any sense.

Selling baby’s this way is just plum crazy.