Spam in a Can: “Godfather of Spam” Sent to Jail for 51 Months

Last week saw the sentencing of one of society’s most despised characters, Alan Ralsky, 64, the self-proclaimed “Godfather of Spam.” Ralsky was sentenced to 51 months in jail and five years probation as well as a $250,000 property seizure.

Ralsky’s son-in-law Scott Bradley, 48, and two others were also sent to jail for wire and mail fraud and violating the CAN-SPAM Act, which criminalizes large, commercial e-mail messages sent using an unauthorized computer or with the intent to hide the e-mail’s original source.

Ralsky reportedly sent 70 million messages a day from fake names. In the specific scheme in this case, Ralsky and his team sent billions of illegal e-mail advertisements to inflate the price of Chinese penny stocks and then reaped the profit — making nearly $3 million during the summer of 2005. His accomplice How Wai John Hui was also sentenced to 51 months in prison and 3 years of probation, and he agreed to forfeit $500,000.

Ralsky is a former insurance salesman who lost his license due to misconduct and was previously convicted of federal crimes, here.

For the full story, click here

7 Responses to “Spam in a Can: “Godfather of Spam” Sent to Jail for 51 Months”


  1. 1 Anonymously Yours 1, November 30, 2009 at 9:20 am

    Is Spam good with May O’Naze?

  2. 2 Elaine M. 1, November 30, 2009 at 9:54 am

    Maybe Monty Python will come out with a new version of “Spamalot”–a modern-day musical based on Ralsky.

    AY–

    Spam is not good with anything!

  3. 3 maverratick 1, November 30, 2009 at 7:22 pm

    Well this is a silver lining to the CAN-SPAM act… this unapologetic bastard finally got CAN-ned. It’s rare these days for a spammer to cheerfully announce his attention to send junk to every email address on the planet, his firm belief that he should be allowed to do so, and that people should not be filtering his crap. As I grow older, the memories fade, and eventually falter… but even if I get Alzheimer’s I’ll never forget the balls on this guy.

  4. 4 Byron 1, December 3, 2009 at 6:48 pm

    Elaine:

    I disagree, try it on pumpernickel with cheddar cheese and red onion with horseradish mustard and a good cold beer.

  5. 5 Gyges 1, December 3, 2009 at 7:20 pm

    Byron,

    Amen, assuming you insert a “fried” in there. Cold spam is gross. Warm spam is good as a very occasional treat.

  6. 6 Byron 1, December 3, 2009 at 7:37 pm

    Gyges:

    if you are hungry cold spam is like well cold spam.

    Fry the spam, melt the cheese, maybe fry the onions yum!

    Elaine doesn’t know what she is missing. Although it is always good to have a couple of beers while making the sandwich.

  7. 7 Elaine M. 1, December 5, 2009 at 11:30 am

    Byron–

    Elaine DOES know what she is missing! My husband and I used to go camping a lot when we were young. Spam was one of our food staples. Just thinking about eating Spam now gives me the shivers!


Leave a Reply




Bookmark and Share

Turley Tweets

Click here to follow the blog on Twitter.

VOTED THE #1 LEGAL THEORY AND LAW PROFESSOR BLOG OF THE TOP 100 LEGAL BLOGS BY THE ABA JOURNAL IN 2008

blawg100_2008_winner9349c7

Categories

Archives