The cop is mentally unstable.

Good to see you around as well. I’m going to hit the hay (and once I’ve tired of that I’ll probably go to bed). Good to see that the regulars are still doing it …

Glad you enjoyed. One lives to be of service.

And stop giving Homeland Security ideas!

Another amusing thrashing enjoyed by moi.

Man, I need to come check out these threads more often. The case of the infectious bubbles has been legendary!

One more thing Homeland Security needs to take more seriously …

lol

See, Russell Wayne? THAT’S what gets boring about dealing with the psychotic.

They have such limited material. The voices in their head are often stuck in a loop.

What are the chances that I might have contracted AIDS?

Could I have made a citizens arrest on the couple’s baby?

Anyone?

It did not seem like the squeal of delight, but more like the squeal of a stuck pig that just got slaughtered.

And Buddha, it doesn’t sound like you are laughing anymore!

I’ll keep pissing you off until I get ready to go to bed if it amuses me, Troll. You can count on that.

Really. It’s no problem. You’ll continue to make yourself look disturbed and unable to accept being beaten. And I’ll keep on laughing.

Seriously. You couldn’t beat me with a stick, in an argument or otherwise. I have clothes smarter (and saner) than you.

“In a statement to the Sun, Winkels stressed she wasn’t arrested for blowing bubbles.

“The fact is that the bubbles had nothing to do with my arrest,” she said. “The reason I was arrested is because I was wearing a backpack and had a lawyer’s phone number written on my arm. This number was given out by lawyers, and they advised us to have it written somewhere on our bodies.”

The 20-year-old was a volunteer street medic at the G20 and said she “wasn’t even protesting.”

“My medical supplies were taken and suggested they could be used as evidence for my charge,” she said.

Court records show she is charged with one count of conspiracy to commit mischief over $5,000.

Winkels said she was talking to another officer when “Officer Bubbles” came over and angrily told her to put her bubbles away.

“I was having a conversation with the female officer,” she said. “She asked me my name, and I preferred not to give it. If she had asked me to identify myself to the police, I would have shown them my ID which I was carrying in my pocket, however, she was talking to me person to person, not officer to civilian.”

Winkels asked the female officer if her bubbles were bothering her.

“She laughed and shrugged her shoulders, which I perceived as a ‘No big deal!’” she said. “After this point, Officer Bubbles stormed over and said what he said on the video.”

Winkels said she put the bubbles away and the officer went away.

She was later swept up with others when arrests were made at Queen St. W. and Noble St. in Parkdale.

“I was not ‘blowing them in his face’ or being rude, I was simply trying to keep the mood of the crowd light, as I figure happy people are less likely to start a violent outbreak,” Winkels said. “There was no way I could have blown them in his face because, as I said, he was nowhere near me when I was blowing them, until he came over to talk to me. He was standing roughly 20 or 30 feet away, and nowhere near the range of the bubbles.”

Winkels said she feels she was not treated fairly during the G20.

“I was denied many of my civil and human rights, and this whole situation has been blown out of proportion, no pun intended,” she said.”
______

Oh yeah! There’s some dangerous intent to harm and/or offend in that gal! roflol

This makes Officer Bubbles look like even more of a dick. I was kind of wondering why the female officer is chuckling in the video. She was laughing at his ridiculous machismo.

Blouise – It was just a retort to Buddha’s comment about my need for common sense.

===============================================================
Your first post: (emphasis added for clarification)

Russell West
1, July 14, 2010 at 3:58 pm
To extend the theoretical debate, how does the officer know it was JUST Bubbles? Could be mixed in with obnoxious bodily substances or even worse!

Buddha’s response to your question about “the officer”:
“A little something called “common sense”.” … and Buddha continues in the post to refer to the officer as … he … him. Never once during that initial post does he refer to you as being the one lacking common sense or to you, personally, at all.

Thus your claim that you were merely responding to his comment about your need for common sense is completely false.

Unless, of course, you are the officer who arrested the bubbleblower posting here under a different name … then, yes he inferred you lacked common sense.

Though I do find it interesting that you characterize your comment as a “retort” but others comments as “personal attacks”.

Oh, that’s right. You can’t.

Battery is both a tort and a crime. Its essential element, harmful or offensive contact, is the same in both areas of the law. You almost got the definition of the elements correct. The “substance put into motion by him”? Cite the specific code for the jurisdiction in question or you’re simply making shit up again.

Not that you could argue that any better than you argue battery.

Court records show she is charged with one count of conspiracy to commit mischief over $5,000. Not due to to the bubbles but because
she was wearing a backpack and had a lawyer’s phone number written on her arm.

http://www.torontosun.com/news/torontoandgta/2010/07/15/14726811.html#/news/torontoandgta/2010/07/15/pf-14726401.html

And Buddha – You touted your legal sophistication when describing how you argue when you said ““. . . because that’s what lawyers do,,”. Is that what lawyers do – not know anything about the law? I decided to stay around long enough to show that you were actually a dumb-shit pretending to be a smart guy! This pretty much does it!

Notwithstanding the sympathy for buddle girl, it is simple; the cop had the right to not get the bubbles blow in his face.

The pattern here seems to be personal attack when logic doesn’t carry the argument. Your qualifications to evaluate my personality and the information that you have to base it on are about as groundless and hollow as your arguments.

It is simple; the cop had the right to not get the bubbles blow in his face.

===============================================================

Russell, Russell … the first personal attack was rendered by yourself as follows: (emphasis added for clarification)

Russell West

She is not placing it in her mouth; she is blowing on it like any 4 year old knows how to do! She could urinate in it, spit in it, or accidentally infect it with her own viruses. Things you should know if you had any common sense.

Don’t whine about getting back what you gave … it’s, what’s the word I’m looking for? … soooo hypocritical ( A hypocrite thinks that what he or she usually professes does not somehow apply to him or her.)

You chose to defend an LEO’s action that the rest of the world is laughing at. Now I can be reasonably certain that when the big man decided to go after the little bubbleblower, he had no idea he would become a world renown laughingstock … but that sometimes happens to bullies … even ones who carry badges. And sometimes all it takes is a bubble.

Battery is defined at common law as “any unlawful touching of the person of another by the aggressor himself, or by a substance put in motion by him.”

Sorry.

You still don’t move on to Final Jeopardy, ‘lil Russell Anosognosia.

It is simple; the cop had the right to not get the bubbles blow in his face.

Look, there is no self-righteous indignation … transference of self-guilt.. deep sincerity of hate.

=================================================================

heh, heh (live by the sword …..)

If you are still there please go to link below when you have time and comment:

http://jonathanturley.org/2010/07/13/oakland-police-announce-they-will-not-respond-to-various-crimes-like-burglary-grand-theft-and-other-crimes/#comment-144583

Message received. This is a major relief. Like the rest of the salon, I wish him well.

It is simple, the cop had the right to not get the bubbles blow in his face.

When breathing is outlawed, only outlaws will breathe.

BTW, since you asked me a direct question the other day, you’ll find this of particular interest:

http://jonathanturley.org/2010/07/15/philadelphia-officers-arrested-in-drug-conspiracy/#comment-144858

“Borderline personality disorder (BPD) is a serious mental illness characterized by pervasive instability in moods, interpersonal relationships, self-image, and behavior. This instability often disrupts family and work life, long-term planning, and the individual’s sense of self-identity. Originally thought to be at the “borderline” of psychosis, people with BPD suffer from a disorder of emotion regulation. While less well known than schizophrenia or bipolar disorder (manic-depressive illness), BPD is more common, affecting 2 percent of adults, mostly young women. There is a high rate of self-injury without suicide intent, as well as a significant rate of suicide attempts and completed suicide in severe cases. Patients often need extensive mental health services, and account for 20 percent of psychiatric hospitalizations. Yet, with help, many improve over time and are eventually able to lead productive lives.

Symptoms

While a person with depression or bipolar disorder typically endures the same mood for weeks, a person with BPD may experience intense bouts of anger, depression, and anxiety that may last only hours, or at most a day. These may be associated with episodes of impulsive aggression, self-injury, and drug or alcohol abuse. Distortions in cognition and sense of self can lead to frequent changes in long-term goals, career plans, jobs, friendships, gender identity, and values. Sometimes people with BPD view themselves as fundamentally bad, or unworthy. They may feel unfairly misunderstood or mistreated, bored, empty, and have little idea who they are. Such symptoms are most acute when people with BPD feel isolated and lacking in social support, and may result in frantic efforts to avoid being alone.

People with BPD often have highly unstable patterns of social relationships. While they can develop intense but stormy attachments, their attitudes towards family, friends, and loved ones may suddenly shift from idealization (great admiration and love) to devaluation (intense anger and dislike). Thus, they may form an immediate attachment and idealize the other person, but when a slight separation or conflict occurs, they switch unexpectedly to the other extreme and angrily accuse the other person of not caring for them at all. Even with family members, individuals with BPD are highly sensitive to rejection, reacting with anger and distress to such mild separations as a vacation, a business trip, or a sudden change in plans. These fears of abandonment seem to be related to difficulties feeling emotionally connected to important persons when they are physically absent, leaving the individual with BPD feeling lost and perhaps worthless. Suicide threats and attempts may occur along with anger at perceived abandonment and disappointments.

People with BPD exhibit other impulsive behaviors, such as excessive spending, binge eating and risky sex. BPD often occurs together with other psychiatric problems, particularly bipolar disorder, depression, anxiety disorders, substance abuse, and other personality disorders.”

Learn more about this illness and its treatment at: http://www.nimh.nih.gov/health/publications/borderline-personality-disorder-fact-sheet/index.shtml

Follow your own advice and seek help.

It is simple, the cop had the right to not get the bubbles blow in his face.

Your mind operates in fantasy land. You create the elements you need in an argument. Factual deficiency, personality disorder, all unfounded, all made up as needed. You become a scientist, a lawyer or psychologist as needed. Probably most of what you say is cut and pasted from somewhere else.

I feel sorry for your kids and wife if you have any. I can walk away. They have to put up with this all the time! My advice, which I am sure you won’t take but I will give it to you anyway. Get on medication. Seek help! Don’t act on too many of your conclusions.

The Left wing is filled with morons like you, stay there.

==============================================================

There ya go … self-righteous indignation … transference of self-guilt (wife/kids remark)… deep sincerity of hate … the only thing missing is a reference to Jesus saves … sounds like a really pissed off cop.

Buh-bye.

~Samuel Johnson

************

These words came immediately to mind after reading the ramblings of Russell West. Sorry, Russ, you picked the wrong Buddha!

But, back to the reasonable man. If a reasonable man is struck by an uninvited and unwanted bubble, whould they charge the bubble attacker with assault and or battery?

If a reasonable man wouldn’t that what does that make the cop? Plus the fact the most cops now wear at least a flack jacket and often more, plus helmet and heavy belt, and those lovely surgical gloves etc.

I feel sorry for your kids and wife if you have any. I can walk away. They have to put up with this all the time! My advice, which I am sure you won’t take but I will give it to you anyway. Get on medication. Seek help! Don’t act on too many of your conclusions.

The Left wing is filled with morons like you, stay there.

I’m explicitly stating it.

Ignorance (factual deficiency) and blind stupidity (logical deficiency) describe how you “argue” quite well.

Like I said, your own feelings of inadequacy become your own worst enemy. Which in itself is mildly entertaining with the emphasis on mildly since it put me to sleep.

Call back once the foaming spittle on your keyboard gives it HIV.

I’d pay a dollar to see that. So would a few of the doctors at the NIH.

Why bother? This guy reminds me of the old joke about coonasses.

“You can tell a coonass from a mile away, but up close you can’t tell ‘em nothin’.”

would be because I’m snoring.