Bed, Bath & Beyond Tissue Boxes Found To Be Radioactive

Bed, Bath, & Beyond is recalling its metal tissue boxes after California health officials found a shipment to be radioactive. The boxes made in India appear to have been made from metal irradiated with cobalt-60. The “Dual Ridge Metal Boutique tissue boxes” are not exactly weapons of mass destruction but they do present a health risk.

The hot boxes were discovered when radiation alarms went off around a truck carrying Bed, Bath, & Beyond goods. Officials believe that the metal used in radiation therapy or medical products was mixed in with the metal used by the manufacturer.

The contaminated items are in the Dual Ridge Boutique product line, model number DR9M. They went to 20 different states and were imported through New Jersey. What I find alarming is that we have spent billions on detectors in ports like New Jersey’s but none of those detection devices identified the radioactive shipment.

The press release noted that if a person spent 10 hours within one foot of the holder, he or she would receive a dose equivalent to a single chest x-ray. This would make for a rather intriguing tort lawsuit since most people would be rather peeved to learn that the tissue box sitting on their office desk gave them the equivalent to an unwanted chest x-ray. Yet, there are no measurable damages for recovery.

Customers who believe they may have purchased a tissue box holder from the Dual Ridge Boutique product line should contact Bed, Bath and Beyond at (800) 462-3966.

Source: ABC

18 Responses to “Bed, Bath & Beyond Tissue Boxes Found To Be Radioactive”


  1. 1 Bron 1, January 17, 2012 at 7:27 am

    “What I find alarming is that we have spent billions on detectors in ports like New Jersey’s but none of those detection devices identified the radioactive shipment.”

    and what is even more disturbing is that the Iranians and others now know are defenses arent any good.

  2. 2 Lottakatz 1, January 17, 2012 at 7:45 am

    This might give pause to all those folks out there with those ornate Indian made hookahs and bongs…. just say’n.

  3. 3 Dredd 1, January 17, 2012 at 7:49 am

    Hey, they glow in the dark so you get blow your nose without turning on the lights.

  4. 4 rafflaw 1, January 17, 2012 at 7:55 am

    Yeah Dredd. You will always know where the Kleenex is!

  5. 5 Frankly 1, January 17, 2012 at 8:05 am

    Made in India – well at least thats a small change from the usual source of contaminated products, China. Its nice to see that all those manufacturing jobs or maters sent overseas are providing additional opportunities for American workers. Probably should shift to the long-term medical care industry, thats where the growth will be.

    The (extremely) high cost of low prices.

  6. 6 Anonymously Yours 1, January 17, 2012 at 9:32 am

    Ah those sensors on most major freeways should have alerted the “Agency” responsible for containment…

  7. 7 Bron 1, January 17, 2012 at 10:46 am

    Gene H:

    now here is a good example of what government should regulate. A simple statute that says the amount of Cobalt 60 allowed in metal is 0 grams or 1 gram per 100 kgs or 1 gram per 1000 kgs, etc.

    Government sets the level based on objective science.

  8. 8 ConLawCon 1, January 17, 2012 at 2:57 pm

    Bed, bath and beyond the Pale.

  9. 9 angrymanspeaks 1, January 17, 2012 at 6:40 pm

    My wife has one and i don’t see the problem. She’s positively glowing with praise.

    Ba-Dum.

  10. 10 pete 1, January 17, 2012 at 7:45 pm

    LK

    that and jewelry

  11. 11 jj 1, January 17, 2012 at 9:47 pm

    Just a small correction. The metal was not irradiated by cobalt-60, but contained cobalt-60. Exposure to cobalt-60 through radiation would not cause the boxes to be radioactive as the energy of cobalt-60 is too low. For example, food is very safely irradiated with cobalt-60. The problem lies in that the boxes were infused with it.

  12. 12 Blouise 1, January 17, 2012 at 10:06 pm

    “The press release noted that if a person spent 10 hours within one foot of the holder, he or she would receive a dose equivalent to a single chest x-ray. This would make for a rather intriguing tort lawsuit since most people would be rather peeved to learn that the tissue box sitting on their office desk gave them the equivalent to an unwanted chest x-ray. ”

    What about employees who were exposed to hundreds of them on a daily basis?

  13. 13 sheafferhistorian 1, January 17, 2012 at 10:46 pm

    I was for it, before I was against it….

  14. 14 Oncology 1, January 18, 2012 at 8:01 pm

    Prof Turley is right about the intriguing law suit part. A dose that small may be a risk, but decades have to go by for measurable harm to be seen. We receive 3 mSv worth of radiation just living on planet earth (up to 6 mSv in some places). Add medical X rays which are worth another 0.2 mSv each worth of ionizing radiation. The peculiar part is that Americans dont mind getting CAT scans for every small niggle which are sometimes worth 50 to 120 X rays in one go….In this case, if a secretary (worst case scenario) sat next to one 230 days a year, her dose is 46 mSv which is the limit for a nuclear industry worker. On the overall, I can see experts arguing this out both ways. Of course, a secretary is not a nuclear industry worker and so a lack of this information itself can be valid grounds for a law suit. I would support the secretary if I was called as an expert for the science. Prof. Turley can tell us more about the tort possibilities.
    The other interesting part is that metal ores from other parts of the world have natural radioisotopes (not just Cobalt 60) in varying amounts. Regulating low levels could be tricky and invite resistance from industry due to added costs for them.

  15. 15 Oncology 1, January 18, 2012 at 8:12 pm

    Clarification: We receive about 3 mSv to 6 mSv. worth of ionizing radiation from the background (solar, cosmic, radon, natural radioisotopes etc.) per year. I missed the “per year” in my sentence in the previous post.

  16. 16 Robin 1, May 12, 2012 at 6:48 pm

    What do you mean, Americans don’t mind getting CT scans – are you nuts?!


  1. 1 Radioactive tissue box? I’m afraid so. « RantCentral.com Trackback on 1, February 1, 2012 at 7:40 pm

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s




Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Turley Tweets

Click here to follow the blog on Twitter.

SELECTED AS TOP LEGAL OPINION BLOG (2011)

SELECTED AS TOP LEGAL THEORY AND LAW PROFESSOR BLOG (2008)

blawg100_2008_winner9349c7

Winner — Top Opinion Writer By Aspen Institute and The Week Magazine for Best Single-Issue Advocacy (Civil Liberties)

Categories

Archives


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,509 other followers

%d bloggers like this: