Postal Worker Accused Of Stepping Around Dying Man In Denver In Delivering Mail

A Denver family has a notable complaint about their mail service. The Porch family alleges that a carrier delivered mail to their house and walked by the body of Dale Porch, 46, who collapsed on his porch after working “the graveyard shift” at his job. The carrier reportedly said and did nothing.

Hedy Porch reports that her husband collapsed after returning from work at the Regional Transportation District. He collapsed on the stairs, requiring the carrier to step around the body.

Notably, postal officials defended the actions — or inaction — of the courier. He said that the courier thought that the body was a Halloween decoration. If so, this would not be the first time that people have walked by a body thinking it was art (here) or a decoration(here). Indeed a few years ago, there was a case strikingly similar in the claim of confusion. A lawsuit appears inevitable after a tragic accident in St. Louis where a 17-year-old girl is in a critical condition after she became tangled in a noose at a Halloween haunted house called Creepyworld. The girl was working as an actress at the attraction and was found unconscious. What is particularly chilling is that people appeared to have walked by her hanging in the house and thought she was a realistic prop. Notably, the attraction had people walk through to check on the well-being of actors and she was discovered but not for some time after the accident. She is in critical condition. Creepyworld employs 100 people and can expect a negligence lawsuit.

Given the explanation, I am skeptical of the chances for a lawsuit. The fact that it occurred around Halloween works to benefit of the courier who can claim to be clueless but not culpable.

Source: Denver Channel

19 Responses to “Postal Worker Accused Of Stepping Around Dying Man In Denver In Delivering Mail”


  1. 1 rafflaw 1, November 12, 2012 at 1:01 am

    The family should be happy that they got their mail on time!
    I agree that the carrier should not be liable for any damages.

  2. 2 Aziz 1, November 12, 2012 at 1:03 am

    Isn’t he under no duty to act anyway? Even if he did see the man dying, doesn’t the law say that you are free not to act?

  3. 3 justagurlinseattle 1, November 12, 2012 at 1:10 am

    It is VERY sad that the man died… and I think they carrier should have done something…..
    BUT… NOT liable for damages…

    I’m kinda getting sick of people trying to make money off peoples death….

    I can’t help but notice the many ironies in this post….. Starting… with them getting their mail on time, as Rafflaw points out…. :-)

  4. 4 justagurlinseattle 1, November 12, 2012 at 1:12 am

    OK… I really should have read the whole thing….

    In this case…. YOu really can’t blame the carrier… NOT ONE bit….

  5. 6 Zarathustra 1, November 12, 2012 at 3:30 am

    My guess is that this mailman will not be getting a tip this Christmas…..

  6. 7 idealist707 1, November 12, 2012 at 4:59 am

    We have “the mails must go through in spite of….”.

    We also have the Good Samaritan which translates here as “if what appears to be a dead person or a person in distress is encountered, then ascertaining same and giving assistance accdg to bla bla will be provided and notice given of this condition to the bla bla public agency.

    If the body has begun to putrify, then mail deliveries may be suspended until such time as the body has been removed.”
    ============

    Hope the sarcssm is noted for what is was meant to be.
    Pass it on to the Post Office if you like, no copyright claimed.

  7. 8 BusterCherry 1, November 12, 2012 at 6:34 am

    We have not been given a description of the neighborhood. In some areas it is quite common for people to sleep on steps at doorways, whether they live there inside the doorway or not. They dont always snore and why should one bother them. It would be as if you were trying to shoo the poor, hungry, street people away. Let em be. If they are dead then so be it. They got a right to die in peace just like you. Step around em. I cant believe that you are even having this conversation. What, do ya all live in Georgetown or the Hamptons? Get a life– or step over a dead one.

  8. 9 Anonymously Yours 1, November 12, 2012 at 7:12 am

    Raff… I’m in agreement with you and the professor on this one…. Timing is everything…

  9. 10 Streetwise2011 1, November 12, 2012 at 8:58 am

    There are three things to consider :
    1. What time the man arrived home from work
    2. What time the mail was delivered.
    3. What was the time of death.

    This happened about 2nd November when some Halloween decorations would have been in disarray. It was reasonable for the mail carrier to make the assumption this was a Halloween decoration.

    What about the family? When their loved one didn’t arrive home on time, why didn’t they go and check? It’s possible the man was dead before the mail was delivered. The family are making a mountain out of a molehill.

  10. 11 Rich 1, November 12, 2012 at 9:20 am

    It isn’t clear that the family was particularly vigilant either.

  11. 12 Malisha 1, November 12, 2012 at 10:05 am

    The mail carrier somehow had a responsibility to check on the health of all those on his route? How does that go?

  12. 13 Me 1, November 12, 2012 at 10:16 am

    Must’ve been a republican mail carrier.

  13. 14 nick spinelli 1, November 12, 2012 at 11:48 am

    Another reason to go w/ UPS or FedEx.

  14. 15 bettykath 1, November 12, 2012 at 11:51 am

    Third shift is dangerous to your health.

  15. 16 nick spinelli 1, November 12, 2012 at 12:16 pm

    bettykath, So correct. I worked @ a resort hotel in Wildwood, NJ during 2 college summers. The second summer I had swing shift. We worked 6 days a week and I worked 2 days on the 1st, 2nd, and 3rd shift. My circadian rhythms were screwed up the entire summer.

  16. 17 pete 1, November 12, 2012 at 4:08 pm

    walked by the body of Dale Porch, 46, who collapsed on his porch

    good thing the mans name wasn’t thomas crapper.

  17. 18 Darren Smith 1, November 12, 2012 at 5:11 pm

    Morally, the carrier was lacking. Legally? I don’t see how from a legal standpoint the carrier or the USPS could be held for this omission. If he was dead, there is not law that I know of where a person is required to report a dead body. Concealing it is one thing, reporting it another. If the man was in obvious need of medical attention that would be another matter.

    Sometimes the law ban be as bit cold hearted, if it actually had a heart.

    Usually, it is just better to do the right thing and avoid the fallout. Thinking from just a practical point of view.

  18. 19 arbooz 1, February 13, 2013 at 5:36 am

    Интересная статья — скопировала цитату и ссылку.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s




Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Turley Tweets

Click here to follow the blog on Twitter.

SELECTED AS TOP LEGAL OPINION BLOG (2011)

SELECTED AS TOP LEGAL THEORY AND LAW PROFESSOR BLOG (2008)

blawg100_2008_winner9349c7

Winner — Top Opinion Writer By Aspen Institute and The Week Magazine for Best Single-Issue Advocacy (Civil Liberties)

Categories

Archives


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,519 other followers

%d bloggers like this: