Comments on: Company Insists That It Is Not Guilty of Prostitution In Hiring “Condom Testers” http://jonathanturley.org/2012/11/19/company-insists-that-it-is-not-guilty-of-prostitution-in-hiring-condom-testers/ Res ipsa loquitur ("The thing itself speaks") Sun, 19 May 2013 03:00:34 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: Lrobby99 http://jonathanturley.org/2012/11/19/company-insists-that-it-is-not-guilty-of-prostitution-in-hiring-condom-testers/#comment-453063 Tue, 20 Nov 2012 20:12:05 +0000 http://jonathanturley.org/?p=57004#comment-453063 Product testing. What’s the problem here?

]]> By: Bob http://jonathanturley.org/2012/11/19/company-insists-that-it-is-not-guilty-of-prostitution-in-hiring-condom-testers/#comment-452783 Tue, 20 Nov 2012 10:56:03 +0000 http://jonathanturley.org/?p=57004#comment-452783 I guess this is part of the executive compensation package.

]]> By: Todd http://jonathanturley.org/2012/11/19/company-insists-that-it-is-not-guilty-of-prostitution-in-hiring-condom-testers/#comment-452735 Tue, 20 Nov 2012 05:39:42 +0000 http://jonathanturley.org/?p=57004#comment-452735 We don’t “allow people to have sex for money if they do so on film.” That’s why the porn jndustry can only operate in a few select locations- it is illegal in most if the country as prostitution.

]]> By: Woosty's still a Cat http://jonathanturley.org/2012/11/19/company-insists-that-it-is-not-guilty-of-prostitution-in-hiring-condom-testers/#comment-452703 Tue, 20 Nov 2012 03:49:21 +0000 http://jonathanturley.org/?p=57004#comment-452703 pete9999
1, November 19, 2012 at 10:04 pm
————————
hahahaha! I know….that’s a level of curiosity that just escapes me….hahahaha!

]]> By: Gene H. http://jonathanturley.org/2012/11/19/company-insists-that-it-is-not-guilty-of-prostitution-in-hiring-condom-testers/#comment-452694 Tue, 20 Nov 2012 03:39:08 +0000 http://jonathanturley.org/?p=57004#comment-452694 I’d rather not.

]]> By: Oro Lee http://jonathanturley.org/2012/11/19/company-insists-that-it-is-not-guilty-of-prostitution-in-hiring-condom-testers/#comment-452692 Tue, 20 Nov 2012 03:37:51 +0000 http://jonathanturley.org/?p=57004#comment-452692 (insert petraeus joke here)

or just insert Patraeus

]]> By: pete9999 http://jonathanturley.org/2012/11/19/company-insists-that-it-is-not-guilty-of-prostitution-in-hiring-condom-testers/#comment-452678 Tue, 20 Nov 2012 03:04:36 +0000 http://jonathanturley.org/?p=57004#comment-452678 Woosty

i don’t believe i’d stick my finger someone elses sperm collector.

(insert petraeus joke here)

]]> By: nick spinelli http://jonathanturley.org/2012/11/19/company-insists-that-it-is-not-guilty-of-prostitution-in-hiring-condom-testers/#comment-452621 Tue, 20 Nov 2012 00:08:23 +0000 http://jonathanturley.org/?p=57004#comment-452621 Young man Dredd we had a milk man in my youth. I’m an old mofo and understand all references back to the mid 50′s. My older sister loved Herman’s Hermits. That clip was nostalgic and melancholy. Mary played that 45 continuously! That is until the next Herman’s Hermits record came out. She obsessed on the Righteous Brothers also…better selection IMHO.

]]> By: Woosty's still a Cat http://jonathanturley.org/2012/11/19/company-insists-that-it-is-not-guilty-of-prostitution-in-hiring-condom-testers/#comment-452602 Mon, 19 Nov 2012 23:32:48 +0000 http://jonathanturley.org/?p=57004#comment-452602 Dredd
1, November 19, 2012 at 5:27 pm
Woosty’s still a Cat 1, November 19, 2012 at 5:17 pm
==============================
I think you just shot down their assertion that the machines were too expensive.
———————————- ;) indeed

]]> By: idealist707 http://jonathanturley.org/2012/11/19/company-insists-that-it-is-not-guilty-of-prostitution-in-hiring-condom-testers/#comment-452592 Mon, 19 Nov 2012 23:18:45 +0000 http://jonathanturley.org/?p=57004#comment-452592 Time flies, and here comes the voice from the past creeping. Old fart indeed!

Words morph, well it all does, only greed and power are unchanged. Try immersing in another culture for 44 years and see what happens, You are so out of it you can’t
even see the difference. Dive back into your bunny hole if you can find it.

Like visiting Times Square for the first time, come up out of the subway and lose all reference points.

=========================

I must remember to ask for twilight anesthasia. Re Nick’ advice.

]]> By: Dredd http://jonathanturley.org/2012/11/19/company-insists-that-it-is-not-guilty-of-prostitution-in-hiring-condom-testers/#comment-452583 Mon, 19 Nov 2012 23:04:53 +0000 http://jonathanturley.org/?p=57004#comment-452583 opps “milk man” not “milk many” …

]]> By: Dredd http://jonathanturley.org/2012/11/19/company-insists-that-it-is-not-guilty-of-prostitution-in-hiring-condom-testers/#comment-452572 Mon, 19 Nov 2012 22:36:23 +0000 http://jonathanturley.org/?p=57004#comment-452572 PS nick, this song encapsulates an older version of milk delivery, where the customers would leave, 1, 2 or more empty milk bottles on their front porch and the milk many would replace that many with new bottles full of the day’s milk.

]]> By: Dredd http://jonathanturley.org/2012/11/19/company-insists-that-it-is-not-guilty-of-prostitution-in-hiring-condom-testers/#comment-452570 Mon, 19 Nov 2012 22:34:06 +0000 http://jonathanturley.org/?p=57004#comment-452570 nick spinelli 1, November 19, 2012 at 5:26 pm

Dredd, LOL. You just gave a version of the 1960′s, “Some of my best friends are Negroes.” … I bet there were a lot of kids who think the same. Collateral pc damage of a legit word, just out of fashion.
============================================
No doubt about it.

Check out the words “the company was gay” … “my love reigned as Queen” … “terrist house” … etc. from a band of modern history, not ancient history.

Words morph:

]]> By: Dredd http://jonathanturley.org/2012/11/19/company-insists-that-it-is-not-guilty-of-prostitution-in-hiring-condom-testers/#comment-452568 Mon, 19 Nov 2012 22:27:32 +0000 http://jonathanturley.org/?p=57004#comment-452568 Woosty’s still a Cat 1, November 19, 2012 at 5:17 pm
==============================
I think you just shot down their assertion that the machines were too expensive.

]]> By: nick spinelli http://jonathanturley.org/2012/11/19/company-insists-that-it-is-not-guilty-of-prostitution-in-hiring-condom-testers/#comment-452567 Mon, 19 Nov 2012 22:26:54 +0000 http://jonathanturley.org/?p=57004#comment-452567 Dredd, LOL. You just gave a version of the 1960′s, “Some of my best friends are Negroes.” You know it’s funny, my daughter when she was in high school[this millenium] heard me say “Negro.” I was talking about an old black guy I knew. She gasped and thought it was akin to “nigger” which has never heard me say. I bet there were a lot of kids who think the same. Collateral pc damage of a legit word, just out of fashion.

]]> By: Dredd http://jonathanturley.org/2012/11/19/company-insists-that-it-is-not-guilty-of-prostitution-in-hiring-condom-testers/#comment-452561 Mon, 19 Nov 2012 22:21:06 +0000 http://jonathanturley.org/?p=57004#comment-452561 nick spinelli 1, November 19, 2012 at 3:48 pm

… male on male sex … anal sex … anal sex … I’m not gay … my digital rectal exam is coming up …
==============================
Are you being PC today? ;)

I can’t process “anal” and “sex” with my olde timey mental dictionary’s definition of “sex”.

Anal intrusion, butt throbs, internal combustion, and things of that sort come to my mind when I hear those words.

Being straight is ok IMO, because I kissed a Girl and I Liked It, even though some of my friends have been gay.

]]> By: Woosty's still a Cat http://jonathanturley.org/2012/11/19/company-insists-that-it-is-not-guilty-of-prostitution-in-hiring-condom-testers/#comment-452559 Mon, 19 Nov 2012 22:17:28 +0000 http://jonathanturley.org/?p=57004#comment-452559

[youtube http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W3GiEGPm-Ws&w=560&h=315%5D

]]> By: nick spinelli http://jonathanturley.org/2012/11/19/company-insists-that-it-is-not-guilty-of-prostitution-in-hiring-condom-testers/#comment-452549 Mon, 19 Nov 2012 21:43:53 +0000 http://jonathanturley.org/?p=57004#comment-452549 ID, Here in the US they give you that twilight anasthesia so the procedure is a piece o’ cake. It’s the prep that sucks, drinking a gallon of nasty tasting stuff and sitting on the toilet 20 times! I got a 10 year clearance after my first one. You should have had many by now you old fart.

]]> By: Jude http://jonathanturley.org/2012/11/19/company-insists-that-it-is-not-guilty-of-prostitution-in-hiring-condom-testers/#comment-452540 Mon, 19 Nov 2012 21:22:23 +0000 http://jonathanturley.org/?p=57004#comment-452540 By the definition posted, porn is prostitution.

I think the difference usually is who is paying. A third party is paying – in this case a company that produces a product (just like with porn). If one of the participants or someone related to one of the participants is paying, it’s clearly prostitution… But if a third party is paying both parties (or either party), it wouldn’t seem like it would be…

Or if it were, then porn would be, too.

]]> By: idealist707 http://jonathanturley.org/2012/11/19/company-insists-that-it-is-not-guilty-of-prostitution-in-hiring-condom-testers/#comment-452539 Mon, 19 Nov 2012 21:21:25 +0000 http://jonathanturley.org/?p=57004#comment-452539 NickS,

Have you never had a colonoscopy? Or is this the fifth in a year.
Time soon for me after some years since last.

]]> By: nick spinelli http://jonathanturley.org/2012/11/19/company-insists-that-it-is-not-guilty-of-prostitution-in-hiring-condom-testers/#comment-452522 Mon, 19 Nov 2012 20:51:49 +0000 http://jonathanturley.org/?p=57004#comment-452522 Blouise, Martha Raddatz hosted this week yesterday. Since she’s a military reporter she knows the practical side to long deployments w/o sex, something we discussed last week and mentioned it vis a vis Patreus and Allen. It really has to be tough when you’re deployed in a Muslim country. Not like the Gi’s had it in the UK, Germany and Italy during WW2. Or like the soldiers in Viet Nam or Korea.

]]> By: nick spinelli http://jonathanturley.org/2012/11/19/company-insists-that-it-is-not-guilty-of-prostitution-in-hiring-condom-testers/#comment-452520 Mon, 19 Nov 2012 20:48:00 +0000 http://jonathanturley.org/?p=57004#comment-452520 I wonder if they test the condoms using male on male sex? Maybe like Iran, China doesn’t have any homosexuals. But let’s be honest, anal sex is one of the most likely way for HIV to be transmitted. So, if you are a person who engages in anal sex you have a right to know it passes that test. I’m not gay..NTTAWWT. But the countdown to my digital rectal exam is coming up and that orefice is a tighter squeeze. It’s REALLY on my mind.

]]> By: Darren Smith http://jonathanturley.org/2012/11/19/company-insists-that-it-is-not-guilty-of-prostitution-in-hiring-condom-testers/#comment-452480 Mon, 19 Nov 2012 19:10:41 +0000 http://jonathanturley.org/?p=57004#comment-452480 We also have two astronaughts who could be charged under the Chinese definition of prostitution.

“They lack the funds to buy testing equipment”

Wow, that’s not something I would advertise if I was them. Enough money to make machinery but none to ensure quality assurance standards. Seems to be a common ailment of Chinese industry.

Actually in a way this might be different nuance in management / labor relations. The treatment is the same, but at least the bosses are using protection.

]]> By: BarkinDog http://jonathanturley.org/2012/11/19/company-insists-that-it-is-not-guilty-of-prostitution-in-hiring-condom-testers/#comment-452459 Mon, 19 Nov 2012 18:20:57 +0000 http://jonathanturley.org/?p=57004#comment-452459 I have tested a lot of them and never know if they work or not. Of course I never caught nuttin nor have I contributed to the birthin of any babies.

]]> By: Frankly http://jonathanturley.org/2012/11/19/company-insists-that-it-is-not-guilty-of-prostitution-in-hiring-condom-testers/#comment-452440 Mon, 19 Nov 2012 17:13:36 +0000 http://jonathanturley.org/?p=57004#comment-452440 I would imagine the company not only has all the male testers it needs those employees are actually paying the company a salary rather than taking it ;)

]]> By: Dredd http://jonathanturley.org/2012/11/19/company-insists-that-it-is-not-guilty-of-prostitution-in-hiring-condom-testers/#comment-452414 Mon, 19 Nov 2012 16:12:29 +0000 http://jonathanturley.org/?p=57004#comment-452414 “Money for nuthin’ and chicks for free …”

]]> By: Magginkat (@Magginkat) http://jonathanturley.org/2012/11/19/company-insists-that-it-is-not-guilty-of-prostitution-in-hiring-condom-testers/#comment-452408 Mon, 19 Nov 2012 16:08:01 +0000 http://jonathanturley.org/?p=57004#comment-452408 Anyone shared this with David Vitter, Gen. Petraeus?

]]> By: Anonymously Yours http://jonathanturley.org/2012/11/19/company-insists-that-it-is-not-guilty-of-prostitution-in-hiring-condom-testers/#comment-452403 Mon, 19 Nov 2012 16:05:55 +0000 http://jonathanturley.org/?p=57004#comment-452403 Ok…. Now where does one sign up…

]]> By: BarkinDog http://jonathanturley.org/2012/11/19/company-insists-that-it-is-not-guilty-of-prostitution-in-hiring-condom-testers/#comment-452393 Mon, 19 Nov 2012 15:53:10 +0000 http://jonathanturley.org/?p=57004#comment-452393 This is where the rubber meets the road. They are not having fun or getting paid to provide fun so therefore getting paid to test the rubber is not the same as getting paid to get someone to have fun. No pun intended on the fun pun.

]]> By: John http://jonathanturley.org/2012/11/19/company-insists-that-it-is-not-guilty-of-prostitution-in-hiring-condom-testers/#comment-452384 Mon, 19 Nov 2012 15:32:41 +0000 http://jonathanturley.org/?p=57004#comment-452384 So hows the health insurance??

Really? We need government between adults?

]]> By: Dredd http://jonathanturley.org/2012/11/19/company-insists-that-it-is-not-guilty-of-prostitution-in-hiring-condom-testers/#comment-452383 Mon, 19 Nov 2012 15:29:24 +0000 http://jonathanturley.org/?p=57004#comment-452383 “Before one dismisses the legal interpretation, keep in mind that we allow people to have sex for money if they do so on film. We call them actors as opposed to prostitutes. What is the difference between paying a salary to “actors” as opposed to “testers”?”

This seems to be a distinction without a difference.

]]> By: rcampbell http://jonathanturley.org/2012/11/19/company-insists-that-it-is-not-guilty-of-prostitution-in-hiring-condom-testers/#comment-452368 Mon, 19 Nov 2012 15:11:21 +0000 http://jonathanturley.org/?p=57004#comment-452368 “Chen says that they already have enough men. Chen assured people that “[i]n the tests, women usually don’t have such a tough job as only men are responsible for taking notes and getting test results.”

That’s one funny paragraph. Can’t you just envision the corporate bureaucrat in a white lab coat making this statement in all seriousness and with a straight face?

]]> By: Feyd Rautha http://jonathanturley.org/2012/11/19/company-insists-that-it-is-not-guilty-of-prostitution-in-hiring-condom-testers/#comment-452358 Mon, 19 Nov 2012 14:46:37 +0000 http://jonathanturley.org/?p=57004#comment-452358 Isn’t it the same as porn? If you pay for sex, its a crime. If you pay for sex and film it, its porn.

]]> By: Gene H. http://jonathanturley.org/2012/11/19/company-insists-that-it-is-not-guilty-of-prostitution-in-hiring-condom-testers/#comment-452353 Mon, 19 Nov 2012 14:43:59 +0000 http://jonathanturley.org/?p=57004#comment-452353 Because. They can’t. Afford. The machines? (To be read in the voice of William Shatner, Stephen Hawking, or George Carlin.)

]]> By: Chinese Company Seeks to Hire “Condom Testers,” Not Prostitutes | Barticles http://jonathanturley.org/2012/11/19/company-insists-that-it-is-not-guilty-of-prostitution-in-hiring-condom-testers/#comment-452350 Mon, 19 Nov 2012 14:40:02 +0000 http://jonathanturley.org/?p=57004#comment-452350 [...] Chinese Company Seeks to Hire “Condom Testers,” Not Prostitutes [...]

]]> By: Blouise http://jonathanturley.org/2012/11/19/company-insists-that-it-is-not-guilty-of-prostitution-in-hiring-condom-testers/#comment-452348 Mon, 19 Nov 2012 14:38:16 +0000 http://jonathanturley.org/?p=57004#comment-452348 Are you sure this isn’t a plan backed by our Generals?

]]>