http://www.woodtv.com/dpp/news/local/ottawa_county/Contempt-of-court-judge-vs-attorney

I have recently published a novel, Luke2, which hypothesizes how a Christian fundamentalist might alter the face of U.S. politics. I think you’d like it. May I mail you a copy or send you the Kindle file?

Thank you for that. seems they have removed the post and me from the thread.

Not surprised. Real law is not friendly to the crooks.

If anyone wants to know the truth, google lawful detroit and see why i say.

If your posts have more than two links, WordPress automatically sends them to moderation. Neither the Professor nor any of the Guest Bloggers clear the moderation queue and it is effectively limbo. No conspiracy required.

” Final Curtain: Obama Signs Indefinite Detention of Citizens Into Law As Final Act of 2011
Published 1, January 2, 201″

were lost, dropped out or intentionally removed? Some are definitely gone.

Don’t want to get conspiratorial here. Yet.

When Gingrich came out with the call to arms to arrest activist judges on the Ninth Circuit and elsewhere with the Capitol Police (sp) and the U.S. Marshals, he stepped over the line into war crimes. It would be appropriate in this blog to discuss the Judges Trial at Nuremberg prosecuted by the United States alone right after the International Tribunials. Folks can Google Josef Alstoetter and find the articles. Here is a description from wikipedia:
The Judges’ Trial (or the Justice Trial, or, officially, The United States of America vs. Josef Altstötter, et al.) was the third of the 12 trials for war crimes the U.S. authorities held in their occupation zone in Germany in Nuremberg after the end of World War II. These twelve trials were all held before U.S. military courts, not before the International Military Tribunal, but took place in the same rooms at the Palace of Justice. The twelve U.S. trials are collectively known as the “Subsequent Nuremberg Trials” or, more formally, as the “Trials of War Criminals before the Nuremberg Military Tribunals” (NMT).
The defendants in this case were 16 German jurists and lawyers. Nine had been officials of the Reich Ministry of Justice, the others were prosecutors and judges of the Special Courts and People’s Courts of Nazi Germany. They were — amongst other charges — held responsible for implementing and furthering the Nazi “racial purity” program through the eugenic and racial laws.

[...]Bio « JONATHAN TURLEY[...]…

With all this praise your hat size must have grown 4 inches.
That you would “chide” Madison is appalling arrogance.

Those who’ve been kissing up to Turley, especially the women–did you know that Turley has vowed he will stop at nothing to assure that American females are never, ever going to be included in the nation’s contract with its people, the US Constitution? That though males or male pronouns are listed there 39 times, females are never listed there–and you know what it means if you are not named in a contract!

By the way, Mr Turley, I have read your news quotes on how haughtily you mock the efforts of those work endlessly to block sex discrimination against BOTH genders by passing the Equal Rights Amendment which barely missed passing by THREE states and IS declared “viable and contemporaneous”.

For this alone, you should yourself be impeached for professing to be an icon for the US Constitution.

That you would be willing to sling such sleaze around to keep females, girls and males from anything like guaranteed democratic rights is incredible. We 300 000 ask you to take off your “superman” costume and dump it in the garbage. Start over as a genuine person.

How you have hoodwinked these sincere folks (above) is criminal. Folks, go ask Turley what he will do to stop passage of the Equal Rights Amendment:

“Equality under the law shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of sex.”/gender.

Does not matter to him how anyone else feels nor how he ducks accountability for keeping American women second-class, in the company of Jordan, Sudan, Saudi Arabia, Lesotho possibly backed by his Mormon past.

Always ask for more evidence when worshipping idols.

http://www.nationalfootballpost.com/Packers-shareholders-can-be-fined-5000-for-betting-on-NFL.html

Connecting Blackstone on Judgment to the Founders of the Constitution must be like finding the Intent of Congress when a statute is open to more than one interpretation. We would look to speeches and writings by the Founders and to the plain definitions of the words commonly accepted at the time. I typed “Blackstone” “Jefferson” and “judgments” into Google advanced search find these words and a bunch of references came up. For instance:
http://www.sullivan-county.com/deism/blackstone.htm

What I am really interested in is regulating the format of judgments. I have until Christmas to resubmit a S.C. mandamus petition based on the S.C. having jurisdiction because a writ of certiorari isn’t available because former judge Edward Nottingham didn’t write an opinion in my civil lawsuit D of Colorado 02-cv-1950 and I don’t have access to the 10th Circuit either because they ordered the clerks to return my documents.

I found some good citations about the form of judgments in American Jurisprudence and would appreciate any others from anyone. I know that some people think that A.J. is too accessible but I think it is great. I found:

“It is a fundamental rule that a judgment should be complete and certain in itself and its form should be such as to indicate with reasonable clearness the decision which the Court has rendered so that the parties may be able to ascertain the extent to which their rights are fixed.” American Jurisprudence section 444 p 89.

How can I sell that to the S.C.? Help! What legal authorities will they recognize on the form of judgments? What is the legal significance of the U.S. Judicial Canons? Is the form of judgment part of the privileges and immunities clause? There must be something in some old law books…..

Here is William Blackstone: Of Judgment. The S.C. would recognize this right as underlying the privileges and immunities clause because it predates the Constitution and was influential right?

http://www.lonang.com/exlibris/blackstone/bla-324.htm

[...]Bio « JONATHAN TURLEY[...]…

I’ve tried to find a presence for you on Facebook but have come up empty-handed. There’s no question that a Facebook presence would amplify your voice, which I think the country needs, and I urge you to stake a claim there.

Thank you for your correction. I did look up the complaint on PACER after reading what you wrote and it said that the plaintiff suffered “mental anxiety, anguish, distress, humiliation and sleeplessness” but did not mention other damages from prolonged unemployment.

You’re right that the law firm advertises itself as “affordable”.

I’ve heard of you too. And I checked “become a fan” seeing an article you wrote about someone convicted of a non existent crime.
http://www.opednews.com/populum/authorspage.php?sid=51491&entry=&o=y

How often do you think that happens?

In this case I think you cannot blame the judge. In my experience, unless a judge is given every fact and shown every available evidence, and everything is explained clearly, the judge may not know anything about that area of law. And these days, due to the economy, they have less help and far greater case loads.

Please note I am not an automatic admirer of judges. Too many are political appointees who do not subscribe to the oath they have taken. In this case, however, I believe the judge did not have an alternative. My sense is the plaintiff is paying little for representation, which is why the complaint is ten pages and the opposition to the motion to dismiss is seven pages.

Do you mean the president or the president’s men?

Do you believe that there is a “right” not to have rights ignored, such as a right not to be prosecuted without probable cause, a right not to face perjury in court, etc.

I just read a court order dismissing Ralph M. Pentzall v Dollar Tree Stores U.S. Court Eastern PA 10-4270. Pentzall complained that his former employer’s agents spread lies about him to prevent him from getting employment. The Court dismissed because Pentzall didn’t claim that he suffered physical damage to his body or his property (house? car?) and therefore didn’t have a cognizable loss. And of course, three years of unemployment must have damaged his health and caused him to sell or abandon his property. I just don’t see how a court could decide that.

So do you think there is a right not to be defamed?

I am an American citizen who is the victim of our government’s torture program. I am in the process of writing down what has been happening to me. You can read what I’ve written at http://bit.ly/oM8HsU. If you do read my blog, please read it from the beginning. Of particular interest may be this article: http://bit.ly/psfAjB

If you decide it is worth your time to help me, you can contact me on Twitter: @BlithelyIdiot

Sincerely,

Mark Murata

My perception of my various blogs and other public notices is that what I am doing is akin to the warnings people wrote on walls before the WWII exterminations. Beware– our rights are gone!

Thanks for turning me on to your blog. I’ve spent some time reading it this morning and you were right. It’s quite an intriguing Internet destination. Many of your posters are very interesting and intelligent people (although I’m still trying to get a grip on who constitutes “the regulars” as they call themselves). The quality of the conversations on any given thread is quite high, even when they digress. It’s truly a tribute to you that you’ve attracted such a following. What you have to say about the Constitution, governance and even general topics of the day really seems to resonate with people.

Kudos on a blog well done.

Gene

Out of a several year curiosity, I wonder if perhaps you are related to Jack Turley, Architect, who was Partner at Skidmore, Owings and Merrill, in Chicago?

As a young freshly minted architect (Washington University, STL)in the 70s
I worked in Jack Turley’s studio. He came to mind on the 4th of July as we
worked through that holiday one summer. It was fun, BTW.

I have enjoyed your appearances on MSNBC and your calm measured thoughtful commentary. Thanks for a measured voice in what is all too
often a debate in cacophony.

Sincerely,

Frank M. Hammerstrom

You might be inter4ested to know that ther3e is an update to the subject of your post : Florida Prosecutors Charge Leading Atheist Advocate With Unauthorized Practice of Law Due To The Use of Esquire (http://jonathanturley.org/2011/04/01/florida-prosecutors-charge-leading-atheist-advocate-with-unauthorized-practice-of-law-due-to-the-use-of-esquire/) :

Activist Atheist to Sheriff: Leave Me Alone ( http://www.theledger.com/article/20110624/NEWS/110629694/0/APS )

She has filed a lawsuit against the sheriff, et al

Burning?

Jet Fuel?

CESIUM?

That Fateful Meeting-
http://edtheradarman.com/Book_Excerpts.html

“Eventually a basic part of our cross section reduction methods”
http://www.foia.cia.gov/browse_docs.asp?doc_no=0001458639&no_pages=0025&showPage=0001

Can you briefly give me your opinion on the significance of Natural Law in today’s jurisprudence? I have not studied Law but was fascinated to read Ellis Washington’s “Reply To Judge Richard A. Posner on The Inseparability of Law and Morality.

Thank you

I am wondering if you have or will read Annie Jacobsen’s book?

I am working on a complaint against our federal government based on inadequate arrest booking systems per 5 USC section 552a subsection e (9). I have the 2004 and 2009 manuals for the Joint Automated Booking System and also the manual for the Prisoner Tracking System. None of these manuals require verification that there is an actual pending criminal prosecution. The computer systems allow the listing of emails of interested parties but don’t require that the interested parties be actual authorized government prosecutors.

Since 9/11 the feds have spent a lot of money on finger print, eye ball, and tattoo identification but the computer specifications don’t include any mechanism to determine that the prisoner is actually legally a prisoner due to an allegation that they committed a federal offense and/or that there was a hearing in which it was determined that there was an actual criminal charge.

Personally, I was held by USMS 3 times for 5 months total without a criminal charge. I don’t have a criminal record. I was accused of petitioning the U.S. federal courts without permission.

I am really worried that there will be a new organized system of citizen arrests without formal written procedure or criminal prosecutions in the U.S.A. Past genocides were quickly implemented. New computer technology enable mass arrests to be implemented quickly. Prior to WWII some people warned of the risks of genocide but they were ignored. I hope I am wrong. I want to be wrong. I have the DOJ manuals showing that DOJ computer systems are not set up to protect us, only to identify and track us, although the computer systems could protect our rights if so configured.

I was accused of accusing a convicted drug dealer of violating the zoning.