Comments on: Latest Column

By: вакансии

вакансии — Tue, 07 Feb 2012 18:34:14 +0000

This is really attention-grabbing, You are an overly skilled blogger. I’ve joined your rss feed and look forward to in search of more of your magnificent post. Additionally, I have shared your website in my social networks

By: 10 Reasons The U.S. Is No Longer The Land Of The Free | Florida Open Government Watch

Sat, 28 Jan 2012 05:24:32 +0000

[...] 28, 2012 by Joel Chandler In an article written by law professor Jonothan Turley entitled 10 Reasons The U.S. Is No Longer The Land Of The Free the author enumerates some of the horrible decisions made by the political leadership of the [...]

By: матрац

матрац — Wed, 25 Jan 2012 11:51:26 +0000

матрац…

[...]Latest Column « JONATHAN TURLEY[...]…

By: Chicago cutlery

Chicago cutlery — Tue, 24 Jan 2012 19:01:42 +0000

Chicago cutlery…

[...]Latest Column « JONATHAN TURLEY[...]…

By: Learn French now

Learn French now — Sat, 21 Jan 2012 13:22:54 +0000

I will right away seize your rss feed as I can not find your email subscription hyperlink or e-newsletter service. Do you’ve any? Please permit me realize in order that I may subscribe. Thanks.

By: Francisco d'Anconia

Francisco d'Anconia — Fri, 20 Jan 2012 23:31:28 +0000

No if you want your Freedom back Elect Obama and let him crush this country so we can finally rebuild. Another conservative is not the answer as they have no solutions but to appease Big Business. Corruption runs deep. Who is John Galt Real Estate IDX

By: TL

TL — Wed, 18 Jan 2012 20:32:29 +0000

Want your freedom back? Elect Ron Paul
http://the420message.com/

By: 19 need cash com

19 need cash com — Wed, 18 Jan 2012 06:29:03 +0000

My brother suggested I might like this website. He was totally right. This publish actually made my day. You cann’t consider just how so much time I had spent for this info! Thank you!

By: payday loans

payday loans — Sun, 15 Jan 2012 23:02:22 +0000

Magnificent goods from you, man. I have consider your stuff previous to and you’re just too wonderful. I really like what you’ve acquired right here, certainly like what you are saying and the best way by which you say it. You make it entertaining and you continue to care for to stay it sensible. I can not wait to learn much more from you. That is actually a great site.

By: carnation instant breakfast nutrition facts

carnation instant breakfast nutrition facts — Sun, 15 Jan 2012 14:11:51 +0000

I do trust all of the concepts you have presented on your post. They’re very convincing and will definitely work. Still, the posts are too brief for novices. Could you please prolong them a little from next time? Thank you for the post.

By: Суд над Бхагавад Гитой

Суд над Бхагавад Гитой — Fri, 13 Jan 2012 07:58:29 +0000

I have learn several excellent stuff here. Definitely worth bookmarking for revisiting. I surprise how so much attempt you set to make the sort of excellent informative website.

By: Tom Deady

Tom Deady — Thu, 12 Jan 2012 02:11:31 +0000

I do heartly believe that my civil rights were so violated By The State Of Montana, Hill County, and others that not one attnorney is willing to help me as their excuse is I have too live here to so I will not jeoperdize my career to help you. The rights violated were: Maranda rights, right of self incimination, double jeopardy amoung others. I was on probation and my probation officer was also the officer for the alleged victim. She can not be on both sides of the isle at the same time yet my objections were finally herd and the case dismissed without prejadise. and mush more I need help and am tired of being pushed around and

By: Joe Shea

Joe Shea — Thu, 29 Dec 2011 07:33:53 +0000

http://devoid.blogs.heraldtribune.com/12647/behind-you-man-look-behind-you/

This blog article about your Dec. 19 appearanceon Washington View points out a possible UFO that may have been watching you!

By: Indefinite detention the law of the land? « Transition West Marin

Indefinite detention the law of the land? « Transition West Marin — Thu, 22 Dec 2011 21:36:42 +0000

[...] 21 Dec 2011 Jonathan Turley, law professor at George Washington University Law School, on Washington Journal, Dec. 19, 2011, [...]

By: Lola

Lola — Tue, 20 Dec 2011 09:42:13 +0000

I believe everyone should be given the freedom of speech. Every one has the right to express themselves. However, if such comments or jokes will affect a certain community, we might as well avoid making any comments. We should respect each one’s beliefs and must accept them. Making people the joke of a comic or an editorial is not the best way to respect each other.

On the other hand, it’s good that Pres. Obama did something about discrimination issues. However, I’m not sure if his plans were the best solution to solve this problem.

By: Heidi

Heidi — Mon, 19 Dec 2011 16:46:01 +0000

Two questions, Professor Turley – I saw some of your C-Span interview and I’d like to know – do you endorse Ron Paul? And would you be willing to appear on The Daily Show and/or Colbert Report?

By: Clinton: Every Gov’t Has Duty to Protect People From Discrimination and Intimidation Motivated by Religion | Camarillo Publishing Co.

Thu, 15 Dec 2011 19:27:18 +0000

[...] George Washington University professor of public interest law Jonathan Turley warned in a column this [...]

By: Wesley Reidy

Wesley Reidy — Sun, 11 Dec 2011 17:38:10 +0000

EYEMAX-plus is not a cure and it is not medicine. Instead it works to build up your eyes’ health by giving your eyes and body the nutrients they need for optimal health.Of course, the best thing to do is to prevent a cataract from beginning by starting EYEMAX-plus sooner. Once a cataract has started forming, different people experience different results: Some stabilize, keep it from getting worse and avoid the need for surgery. Others watch they doctors test their eyes and find that the cataract decreases in size, or disappears altogether.

By: Conference Call Recording

Conference Call Recording — Sun, 11 Dec 2011 07:47:21 +0000

hi!,I love your writing so so much! percentage we be in contact extra about your post on AOL? I require a specialist in this house to resolve my problem. May be that is you! Looking forward to peer you.

By: Louie Magdaleno

Louie Magdaleno — Fri, 02 Dec 2011 02:14:58 +0000

Security + is a good stepping stone certification covers a lot of basic ideas that might be beneficial if you lack any security experience. If you’ve passed the CCNA and are thinking to get into the security field, CCSP is definitely the way to go providing you want a vendor specific certification. Otherwise CISSP or even CEH (which honestly, I don’t know how in-demand this certification is).

By: obama: a disaster for civil liberties? « hip is everything

obama: a disaster for civil liberties? « hip is everything — Thu, 01 Dec 2011 18:40:44 +0000

[...] very much worth the read … How Much Privacy Do You Expect? The Death of Privacy in America by jonathan [...]

By: I have been reading out many of your posts and i can claim clever stuff.

I have been reading out many of your posts and i can claim clever stuff. — Sat, 12 Nov 2011 08:01:07 +0000

Hello there, I discovered your web site by way of Google while searching for a related topic, your website came up, it seems good. I’ve added to favourites|added to my bookmarks.

By: James Smith

James Smith — Fri, 11 Nov 2011 03:23:06 +0000

Regarding your piece on the right of citizens to video police in public; if the police can use dash cams to video citizens in public, then I think citizens have every right to video police in public. Now, before anyone brands me as a flaming liberal, I will tell you that I am a retired police chief, and was one of the first in our state to use dash cams. They make good evidence and I am still in favor of using them in police cars. But, fair is fair.

By: Al Breeck

Al Breeck — Thu, 27 Oct 2011 14:45:20 +0000

Reading of this Presidential power to kill U.S. citizens overseas, I now see the President is free to authorize murder, yet waterboarding etc is ruled out as an international crime.
The President can authorize indefinite detention and enhanced interrogation techiques of ANYONE even in the U.S., can authorize killing of ANYONE labelled a terrorist, as long as overseas, but just can’t do what Bush did – openly authorize outright torture.
Jose Padilla was turned into a vegetable by Donald Rumsfield via years of total isolation and sensory deprivation, drugs, and yet 11th circuit court of maniacs (Sept. 19 2011) demands he be put away forever due to prior street crimes.

By: izmir söve

izmir söve — Thu, 27 Oct 2011 00:11:49 +0000

Hello there, just was alert to your blog via Google, and found that it is really informative. I am going to watch out for brussels. I will be grateful for those who continue this in future. Numerous folks will be benefited from your writing. Cheers!

By: Tom Abraitis

Tom Abraitis — Wed, 26 Oct 2011 03:06:15 +0000

Prof. Turley, I’ve been absent from your blog for some time. Have you (or could you) issued a report card on President Obama visa visa the rule of law. Besides killing American citizens in the name of protecting us has he
continuing Bush’s warrantless wiretaping ? AG Holder seems to have done nothing on the Wall Street control fraud front, but he has rounded up plenty of “illegals”. To be blunt, my sense is that he’s GWB in black face.
Am I being too extreme? Comparing DOJ’s is America’s Constitution safer?

By: Water Damage Dallas

Water Damage Dallas — Mon, 24 Oct 2011 01:19:30 +0000

Exceptional writing! I just want to know if you have twitter, tumblr or facebook page so I could follow you? And maybe follow me back if you would want to. Thanks!

By: Otteray Scribe

Otteray Scribe — Tue, 18 Oct 2011 17:31:51 +0000

Angelina Geraci, make your argument, but do not expect a comment or post to be deleted. Ain’t gonna happen. This is a legal blog dedicated to the free expressions of ideas, opinions and speech. If you have an argument to make, I suggest you make it.

By: ANGELINA GERACI

ANGELINA GERACI — Tue, 18 Oct 2011 17:22:11 +0000

In reference to this comment posted on Sunday at 10:37pm: “Judy Giglio has worked for Shallow Draft, owned by Paul Molinary. Now actively endorsing Dave Peralta for Parish President, also a realtor and has reasons for the connected to win.”

As the owner of Shallow Draft I am asking you to remove this post, since I have NEVER employed, or nor do I know who Judy Giglio or Paul Molinary is. Here at Shallow Draft we are not looking to take sides or use our company name in any advertising for any campaign.

Also, we don NOT have any relation to the person who gave you this information. I do not want to give my resourse.

Thank You & Please remove this post.

Angelina Geraci
Owner of Shallow Draft
..

By: ANGELINA GERACI

ANGELINA GERACI — Tue, 18 Oct 2011 17:07:21 +0000

In reference to this comment posted: “Judy Giglio has worked for Shallow Draft, owned by Paul Molinary. Now actively endorsing Dave Peralta for Parish President, also a realtor and has reasons for the connected to win.”

Also, we don NOT have any relation to the person who gave you this information. I do not want to give my resourse.

Thank You & Please remove this post.

Angelina Geraci
Owner of Shallow Draft
..

By: Worth Listening, Worth Reading | Truth and Justice For All

Worth Listening, Worth Reading | Truth and Justice For All — Tue, 11 Oct 2011 15:01:56 +0000

[...] Jonathan Turley wrote an Op-Ed for The Los Angeles Times that makes my points, and it is reproduced on his blog. [...]

By: Obama Vs. Civil Liberties « The 1955 Hudson

Obama Vs. Civil Liberties « The 1955 Hudson — Mon, 10 Oct 2011 19:15:15 +0000

[...] Jonathan Turley LD_AddCustomAttr("AdOpt", "1"); LD_AddCustomAttr("Origin", "other"); [...]

By: frank

frank — Wed, 28 Sep 2011 17:57:57 +0000

test.

By: kominki

kominki — Mon, 29 Aug 2011 10:07:41 +0000

I simply had to thank you very much yet again. I’m not certain the things that I would have created in the absence of these pointers contributed by you concerning that industry. Certainly was a very fearsome case in my opinion, but taking note of this specialised technique you solved it took me to jump with delight. Now i’m happy for the assistance and thus have high hopes you really know what a powerful job you were undertaking instructing the others using your site. I am sure you have never met any of us.

By: Judy Malone

Judy Malone — Mon, 15 Aug 2011 22:51:37 +0000

Mr.Turley, With so many repubs.signing the Grover norquist tax pledge,is there any legal recourse the citizens of the U.S.to use our constitution to stop this? How can a fringe group like this bring our gov. to a standstill. We can’t survive as a country on the road we’re on now. thank you,judy malone.

By: Geralyn Niverson

Geralyn Niverson — Sat, 13 Aug 2011 08:51:25 +0000

hello,what an excellent article this is,I found it on bing and I love it very much,I agree with you, lots of things will be learned form your site,but I still have some questions with the last part,can you explain it for me ?I will appreciate your answer,and I will be back again!

By: Assisted Living Huntington Beach Ca

Assisted Living Huntington Beach Ca — Thu, 11 Aug 2011 19:47:40 +0000

Thank you for the sensible critique. Me and my cousin were just preparing to do a little research on this. We got a book from our area library but I think I learned better from this post. I’m very glad to see such magnificent info being shared freely out there..

By: DIgnitasSelect

DIgnitasSelect — Mon, 08 Aug 2011 23:45:02 +0000

I was very pleased to find this.I wanted to thanks for your time for this glorious read!! I definitely enjoying every little bit it.

By: kay sieveding

kay sieveding — Fri, 29 Jul 2011 13:05:12 +0000

I am thinking about sending another petition to the Supreme Court of a recent 10th Circuit ruling that they have the authority to approve sanctions that use unpublished procedures including Rule 11 judgments without Rule 11 (c)(6) orders and restraining orders that don’t comply with Rule 65(d). They actually ruled that it doesn’t matter if a judgment labeled Rule 11 doesn’t have a Rule 11(c)(6) order. When I read articles like this I have less faith in the Supreme Court. Of course, I also don’t understand how they can receive more than 1,000 petitions per justice per year and have time to have even one justice read each one. So why don’t they at least disclose how they select petitions that they read?

I think the result of the current problems in federal courts will be murders. I was totally screwed over because I sued a convicted drug dealer who was in local government office for First Amendment Retaliation. He was my neighbor. I looked up “neighbors” + “shooting”, on the Internet and there were an unbelievable number of accounts. One of them recounted how the shooter got only 4 years of probation. 20-20 reported on a group that advocates that citizens have the right to kill repressive government rulers. I personally have been a gun control advocate my entire life and I am afraid of guns and my vision isn’t so great so I personally would not murder my former neighbor. However, I am convinced that I personally would be better off today if I had murdered him than I was filing truthful complaints in federal court. When I did, I was ordered to pay $101K in legal fees because it was implausible that there was government corruption, or that my neighbor was a drug dealer (although it was later revealed that he was a convicted drug dealer) and therefore my document evidence could not be accepted and my summary judgment motions were not supposed to be responded to. As we all know, there is a lot of government corruption. Federal courts are supposed to be a safe place to complain about government corruption. Now that they are not safe, a certain percentage of aggrieved citizens will at least try to get revenge.

By: bflo82

bflo82 — Thu, 21 Jul 2011 17:27:02 +0000

About sister wives and polygamy:

The best article I have ever read about this is one written by Charles Krauthammer a few years back.Pandora and Polygamy in The Jewish World Review-March 17,2006.It is solid.

By: Swarthmore mom

Swarthmore mom — Wed, 13 Jul 2011 02:58:55 +0000

All fake dems are defeated in Wisconsin, reds.

By: reds

reds — Wed, 13 Jul 2011 01:47:46 +0000

Can you explain to me how Wisconson can put fake Democrats on a ballot? This does not seem right to me, and to tell people that they are fake. What the Republicans have been able to get away with has just been unbelievable. It would seem to me that this is not legal.

By: anthonyfreda111A

anthonyfreda111A — Tue, 12 Jul 2011 15:39:22 +0000

Love your work, keep up the good fight!

By: jim miles

jim miles — Thu, 26 May 2011 22:43:19 +0000

The powerful are SUPPOSEDLY required by federal law to obey the law. De facto, they can just ignore the law, or in Thomas’ case, just say Oops!

By: Robert Nalij

Robert Nalij — Wed, 04 May 2011 01:14:14 +0000

Mr. Turley,

Please allow me to express my great appreciation for your thoughtful and most important Constitutionally centrist columns. I recently read the 5/3/11 USA Today article, “The demon is dead; so are many of our rights”. An excellent read, in a national paper – albeit I admit on page 11a, when this should be the cover story.

The gross expansion of governmental powers and clear violations of liberties by our local, state and federal governments, further espoused by the dumbing of society by a constant stream and perpetual focus on matters of little import (I.e.: prince Henry marriage, Michelle Jackson death, sports, etc.) amplified by a gov’t sediment, that the rule of law is only applicable when it fits the suitors needs, completely in violation of the principles that this country was founded on.

I appreciate such a clear line of direction, to know that not all hope is lost. I am only 25 but truly fear that China will have a freer society and associations then will be afforded to the citizens of this country before I die. We need individuals such as yourself, who are articulate, intelligent and truly understand the values that America was founded do NOT waver in turbulent times to lead this country.

I want, no we need to instill, these values within the minds of every citizen, not the details of every play run by sports star xyz. Who certainly are helping this cause – my question to you is how do we increase the prominence of your respected message?

Regards,
Citizen of NY
______________________________

“Rebellion to tyrants is Obedience to God” – Mr. Benjamin Franklin

“I predict future happiness for Americans if they can prevent the government from wasting the labors of people under the pretense of taking care of them” 3rd US President Mr. Thomas Jefferson

“The democracy will cease to exist when you take away from those who are
willing to work and give to those who would not.” – 3rd US President Mr. Thomas Jefferson

“They who can give up essential liberty to obtain temporary safety, deserve neither liberty or safety” – Mr. Benjamin Franklin

“Timid men prefer the calm of despotism to the tempestuous sea of liberty” – 3rd US President Mr. Thomas Jefferson

By: Energy Solar Systems

Energy Solar Systems — Sun, 01 May 2011 03:34:39 +0000

Informative post.It’s great that one can communicate so well. In my opinion, writing with this topic hasn’t exactly been the wonderful. I found you on Yahoo!.

By: miguel

miguel — Tue, 15 Feb 2011 17:30:18 +0000

hello.

is there a contact email for this blog’s Moderator?

I just need it to request the removal of some rude, offensive stuff that is only detracting from this blog’s scholastic integrity.

thanks

By: Wendell Tesch

Wendell Tesch — Wed, 10 Nov 2010 19:05:29 +0000

Whoa! Image searching yahoo and google all night because of this and i ultimately found it the following!

By: Barbara Shomaker

Barbara Shomaker — Mon, 07 Jun 2010 21:44:09 +0000

http://www.examiner.com/x-33986-Political-Spin-Examiner~y2010m6d6-BP-buys-Google-Yahoo-search-engine-words-to-keep-people-away-from-real-news-on-Gulf-oil-spill-disas

Isnt this unConstitutional be controlling the info available to the public?

By: Kenneth MacKenzie

Kenneth MacKenzie — Sat, 15 May 2010 21:23:21 +0000

News Article: Man indicted after 219 marijuana plants found in home By Steve Kanigher (contact) Wednesday, May 12, 2010 | 11:58 a.m.
A federal grand jury Tuesday indicted a North Las Vegas man for growing an estimated 219 marijuana plants in his home.
. . http://www.lasvegassun.com/news/2010/may/12/man-indicted-after-219-marijuana-plants-found-home/#comments

Comment: In fact and in truth, the 21st Amendment repealed the 18th Amendment with its associated long list of Drugs — Marijuana, Cocain, Morphine, Heroine, and so forth — bringing Marijuana, Cocain, Morphine, Heroin, and so forth, like alcohol, back to legal and lawful status and therefore the wrongful illegal classification of these drugs as “illegal” was repealed by the 21st Amendment. It is reasonable to say that the 21st Amendment is the law of the land and all of the drugs legislated as “illegal,” later, under Title 21 Drug schedules, were inproperly and unconstitutionally legislated in violation of the 21st amendment. The current Title 21 Drug schedules are unconstitutional as they were written after the 21st Amendment repealed them along with the 18th Amendment.
. .Title 21 type Drug schedules were repealed when the 18th Amendment was repealed and cannot be legislated as illegal until the 21st Amendment is repealed. The 21st Amendment did not have language allowing ressurection of any part of the infamous 18th Amendment.
. . In essence, the 21st. Amendment permanently legalized the long list of Drugs, Marijuana, Cocain, Morphine, Heroine, and so forth by repealing the 18th Amendment and its laws that tainted these drugs by identifying these drugs as “ILLEGAL” under the 18th Amendment.
. .The California Supreme court noted in its ruling that the California law allowing Medical Marijuana did not have language that allowed it to be interpreted or amended to restrict possession of any amount.
. .The 21st Amendment cannot be likewise amended to rewrite drug schedules that were repealed along with the 18th amendment.
. . Under Constitutional law, the 21st Amendment must be repealed before Congress can write United States Code Title 21 to ressurect the drugs that the 21st Amendment returned to legal status and are still 21st Amendment legal until the 21st Amendment is repealed.
. .Congress cannot write drug laws in Title 21 as if the 18th Amendment was still alive and these Title 21 laws violate the 21st Amendment.
. . .The current Title 21 laws violate the 21st Amendment which repealed the current Title 21 drug laws when the 21st Amendment was passed.