Thirteen Angry Men: Mistrial Declared After Texas Man Convicted by Vote of 13-0

200px-12_angry_menNow, coming from Chicago, I find nothing curious about this story. However, District Judge Mark Kent Ellis was a bit concerned when a jury returned a conviction against Charles Mapps in only 45 minutes by a vote of 13 jurors. Some would say that would make him really really guilty, but there is a small problem of being a violation of the state constitution.


Mapps was super-convicted of shooting his girlfriend. But the judge found that a thirteenth juror would qualify as an outside influence. The judge said that a substitute bailiff fouled up by letting an alternative in the room and that he has been barred from further work in the courtroom.

For the full story, click here.

8 thoughts on “Thirteen Angry Men: Mistrial Declared After Texas Man Convicted by Vote of 13-0”

  1. Makes sense to me. If you can have a window in a door thats is also a Jury Room. Why not have 13, jurors in the backroom.

  2. We normally don’t have 13 jurors in cases in Chicago, but for the right amount of money, Ex-Governor Blago will work on it for you. Just one more example of how screwed up Texas is.

Comments are closed.