The Women’s Protection Act, passed by Pakistan’s largest province of Punjab last week, would seem the type of law that no civilized person could contest. It offers legal protection to women from sexual abuse and violence while calling for the creation of a toll-free abuse reporting hot line and the establishment of women’s shelters. However, the Council of Islamic Ideology, a powerful Pakistani religious body that advises the government on the compatibility of laws with Islam, has now declared that criminalizing violence against women is “un-Islamic.”
Various Islamic clerics and religious leaders previously denounced the law as conflicting with the teachings of Islam and the Koran.
Fazlur Rehman, the chief of one of Pakistan’s largest religious parties, the Jamiat-i-Ulema Islam, explained that “this law makes a man insecure. This law is an attempt to make Pakistan a Western colony again.” Wow, we certainly would not want to make spousal abusers “insecure.”
We recently discussed how Islamic clerics declared prohibitions on child marriage to be unIslamic.
Woman and girls must continue to live under religious-based, sexist systems in countries like Pakistan that not only deny opportunities of education and professional development but threaten their very lives. It is also an example of the perils of the loss of separation between mosque and state in Muslim countries.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YTOFXLl7eh4
“More young people’s choices are more traditional than they were years ago!” BOOM! Booyah! Now, where’s the equality? Inside a paradox box that feminists kept trying to hide after all these years.
Harald Edda is correct. Where can you find equality in a country? Even if the USA tried to normalize equality, it won’t be able to implement gender quotas for both sexes in different fields. In fact, today, I see co-workers I work with, who are female, seeking out nursing, and other degrees that deal mainly with interpersonal relationships, connecting with other people, and building a social network as opposed to working in engineering, construction, and fields that require muscle, hard work. Some women do work in these fields, but they are not the majority.
Gender equality is a false notion, no kidding! Biology is not a gender, nor a social, construct. It’s a tried and true means for humans, both male and female, to co-exist, not to compete or vie against each other for a specific position, like most marriages are.
Which one is worse? This or the Islamicist way of life?
The Sexodus, Part 1: The Men Giving Up On Women And Checking Out Of Society, Breitbart
The Sexodus, Part 2: Dishonest Feminist Panics Leave Male Sexuality In Crisis, Breitbart
You take your pick.
Also, I don’t endorse Islam. I disapprove of their policies. However, they do not like being civilized like us because our marriage/divorce, false rape accusations, alimony and child support payments, and misandrist policies are “counter-Islamic.” In a way, it is also counter-Christianity as well; despite the sharp decline in religion as noted earlier in Turley’s blog, we’ll eventually see more of that.
So, even though men have given up on women, some of us are hoping 52% are voting with their feet, forcing the politicians to make laws more fair for the men. Unfortunately, women won’t change those laws in their ‘finest hour’.
John B Calhoun did what was called the Great Mouse Experiments. Here is the excerpt:
“In the early 1960s, the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) acquired property in a rural area outside Poolesville, Maryland. The facility that was built on this property housed several research projects, including those headed by Calhoun. It was here that his most famous experiment, the mouse universe, was created.[1] In July 1968 four pairs of mice were introduced into the Utopian universe. The universe was a 9-foot (2.7 m) square metal pen with 4.5-foot-high (1.4 m) sides. Each side had four groups of four vertical, wire mesh “tunnels.” The “tunnels” gave access to nesting boxes, food hoppers, and water dispensers. There was no shortage of food or water or nesting material. There were no predators. The only adversity was the limit on space.
Initially the population grew rapidly, doubling every 55 days. The population reached 620 by day 315, after which the population growth dropped markedly. The last surviving birth was on day 600. This period between day 315 and day 600 saw a breakdown in social structure and in normal social behavior. Among the aberrations in behavior were the following: expulsion of young before weaning was complete, wounding of young, increase in homosexual behavior, inability of dominant males to maintain the defense of their territory and females, aggressive behavior of females, passivity of non-dominant males with increased attacks on each other which were not defended against.[2] After day 600, the social breakdown continued and the population declined toward extinction. During this period females ceased to reproduce. Their male counterparts withdrew completely, never engaging in courtship or fighting. They ate, drank, slept, and groomed themselves – all solitary pursuits. Sleek, healthy coats and an absence of scars characterized these males. They were dubbed “the beautiful ones.” Breeding never resumed and behavior patterns were permanently changed.
The conclusions drawn from this experiment were that when all available space is taken and all social roles filled, competition and the stresses experienced by the individuals will result in a total breakdown in complex social behaviors, ultimately resulting in the demise of the population.
Calhoun saw the fate of the population of mice as a metaphor for the potential fate of man. He characterized the social breakdown as a “second death”. His study has been cited by writers such as Bill Perkins as a warning of the dangers of the living in an “increasingly crowded and impersonal world.”[3]”
We already have the “Beautiful Ones” and they number greatly today.
What these Islamicists did was avert the Great Mouse Experiments from happening, from allowing false rape accusations to grow, and encouraged their own policies that put women into their own place. After all, in Islam, men take first place, not apace with women.
In Christianity, the husband is to be the head, the wife to submit wholly out of love and submission. Unfortunately, its egalitarian effects never paid off in the long run. It only encouraged Feminism to run its course, and now Christianity is never accepted wholly. Unconditional love is scorned, and marriage is seen as a ‘farce’ by a great many, even among most young people.
@Squeeky
Thanks for absolutely pointing this out! I wondered if I was the only “misogynist” for describing these types of abuses by women toward the judicial, marriage/divorce systems, etc. and so on.
@isaacb
You should take a look into a few cases and then dig really deeper into the rabbit hole; it is only then that you’ll realize that the problems are far more deeper. Copy n’ paste, then google away. Ignore the — as they’re comments.
__Sites__
Meet John Nazarian, the King of Scumbags, A Voice for Men
— Maybe not king of scumbags but definitely a scumbag
How to ‘Throw Your Husband Out’, John J Nazarian, Vimeo
Star Crazy: The dark side of Pauley Perrette, A Voice for Men
Pauley want a restraining order? Characteristics of false accusers, A Voice for Men
— Pauley want a cracker? Raaawk!
Divorce Corp, website
— According to their Learn More, the marriages end 41% the first time around, 60% the second time, and 73% the third time. When marriage used to be celebrated as a “bedrock of greatness”, it now can be celebrated as a “circus farce” that has no symbolic meaning; only that it’s crap, being continuously polished as shiny crap.
Barely Half of U.S. Adults Are Married – A Record Low, Pew Research Center (dated 2011)
— 51% of adults 18 and above are married. Today, in 2016, the marriage trend will continue to skydive exponentially thanks to these key factors: MGTOW, Will Farrell, his beginnings of “Myth of Male Power” and his continuous dedication to snowballing the anti-Feminism train, and the rising anti-divorce movement. Many men are “going their own way”, as opposed to upholding traditional roles. For more clarification, check the videos, and do the same method to google ’em.
Marriage Obsolete? Jessica Hopper, ABC News
— Click on the link to Pew Research Center’s PDF, go to pg. 20 and go from there. You’ll find that marriage is defined best as a man and a woman being married together, having children. Others don’t think that LGBT should form families, have children and they account for 80% of that view.
The Artificial Womb Will Change Feminism Forever
— Fake Bake is correct. It will change Feminism and her policies forever, that is if Congress and the rest of its maddened politicians listen. Feminism has more enemies than it could handle. Its most recent enemies are men, the artificial womb, Vasagel, and sex robots. These would combine to give men more greater authority and power over determining who can and will mate: a robot or a real human female.
Artificial wombs: The coming era of motherless births? David Warmflash, Genetic Literacy Project
__Videos__
What is MGTOW? – Redonkulas.com
— Terrence Popp does a lot of math regarding divorce courts: see video below.
DIVORCE BANK – Redonkulas.com
— Math based. He explains simple, basic math on how divorce works, is accounted for, and how much $$$ the man tends to lose before divorce looms over his head.
Are Men Obsolete? Q & A: Karen Straughan Speaks at Ryerson University, Canadian Association for Equality
— GWW. Google GirlWritesWhat and she has tons of videos explaining away the social phenomenon about men walking away, Feminism losing its house of cards and its White Knight footsoldiers. In order for Feminism to breathe better, it needs an ample supply of male footsoldiers to carry out its deeds. Today, it has very little allies and is dying, her last gasp soon to be near.
Making Women Obsolete – MGTOW, Sandman
Artificial Wombs – MGTOW, Sandman
— This is transhumanist stuff. It will come soon. When it does, a lot of the MGTOWs, many men, and others who oppose current divorce laws will start seeking out artificial wombs to reproduce and make sons and daughters of their own. Women, on a whole, will end up childless, or segregated, or worse left to fend for themselves against Islamic invaders, and others.
Sex robots could be ‘biggest trend of 2016’ as more lonely humans seek mechanical companions, mirror.co.uk
Robot Sex May Be Coming Sooner Than You Think, HuffPost Live
Uncanny Lover: Building a Sex Robot | Robotica | The New York Times
— Robots will become more real, more synthetic, and more capable of giving sex when a human companion needs it, desires it, and wants it. Many women think it’ll be for the dweebs, losers, and those who can’t handle a “real woman”. What they fail to realize is that if they continue to support marriage/divorce laws as currently today and in the future with zero or half-hearted changes that result in more men losing out, you bet it won’t be just the dweebs, losers, or those who can’t handle women. It’ll be most men, if not all, in the United States alone.
In the end, it all comes down to this.
When the barbarians at the gate arrive, who will the men take up arms for? Will they galvanize themselves, put on armor, sword and shield, prepare to meet the barbarians for the women, the children, and the civilization at whole? It’ll be the same hurrah, “For Roma! For Roma!” Will it?
Today, no man will take up arms, swear themselves to save civilization, and fight for their empire. They have effectively become fed up with women and their support for misandrist policies. Some men are willing to throw women to the barbarians, without any recourse for help. Think Taharrush Gamea (google it) if the Muslims ever have a chance to do it here in the US with us unarmed.
Yet another example of extremism in the ME. I’ve followed the widespread abuse of women and girls in several ME countries, and it’s bad, completely systemic.
This is the same religious body that also ruled that DNA was inadmissible in rape cases and instead said that women who want a man prosecuted for rape should find four adult male witnesses to testify that it happened.
America has its problems, but it sucks less. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cwQAyskqG0g
In addition to the domestic abuse laws, women also use the child abuse laws as divorce tools and means of control. Saw that way too many times in my life as a DA.
@isaacb
Bored? No, I am just going through a period of despair, where I am questioning how it was we managed to get our country into the pitiful shape it is. Things that we now accept as the norm, probably played a big role.
Plus, I work some for an attorney, and we do a lot of divorces. Frankly, some of these women we see needed to be slapped silly on a regular basis by their husbands, who couldn’t because of Domestic Abuse laws. Said laws being horribly abused by the women as divorce tools, and means of control. As a woman, this is not something I ever thought I would come to believe, but if a person keeps an open mind, they have to face unpleasant truths. Hence, the despair, because these things won’t change. It is too late for us. Our country will have to hit rock bottom.
Squeeky Fromm
Girl Reporter
Does this group have any authority? Are they like the last word on law? The Pope says Trump is un-Christian, doesn’t make Trump un-Christian.
squeeky
Bored?
Russian orthodox, Islamic, Jewish, Christian, all at varying degrees are repressive. These days it’s the turn of Islam to degrade humanity. This is the time of Islam, just as the Spanish Inquisition was the time of Christianity. The only true religion is history. Perverted as it sometimes is, written by the victors and all that, history explains all. Or, you could go to the bible, koran, talmud, torah, etc or Dr. Seuss.
And we embrace this country as a ally and give them billions. It’s nuts.
It’s not just Islam. It’s most of the world that still, as a result of history, culture, and habit, is misogynistic. Women need their own homeland. They need a Female State, with plenty of funding and weapons from the rest of the world. The US needs to provide at least $3-5 billion a year for at least 70 years and allow dual citizenship with the US. All women are welcome to immigrate there and funding would be provided for women who needed help getting there. Men would be allowed as tourists only with complete background checks, psychological tests, and close surveillance.
Can’t wait to read some of the apologists for Muslim insanity blame this one on radical Islam. That seems to be the tactic which is in vogue nowadays. This barbarity is explained away by the delusional Left as attributable to militant, extreme or radical Islam, when, in fact, Muslim clerics, around the globe, demand and perpetuate this savagery based upon various quotes found in religious texts. It isn’t radical Islam; it’s just plain ole Islam. Coming to a city or a town near you.
It’s still a man’s world even in the US
Well, as a woman, I hate to admit it, but the durn Muzzies are probably not too far off the beam on this one. “Women rights” doesn’t work out very well. We need to start looking at our own experiences, and learn from them.
1. We started out giving women the right to vote. Great! Very Reasonable.
2. Then, we started letting women work in various professions. Again, great! Women can be doctors and lawyers. Fire fighters—probably not.
But basically sooo far, no observable problems. I do think stuff is bubbling under the surface.
3. Then, we started rewriting Domestic Relations laws. Women could own property. Divorce laws were liberalized.
This is when stuff started breaking down in a more observable way.
4. With their own incomes, silly women could start having kids without a husband in a really big way. Its always happened, but usually there was hunger and massive problems. Now, with their own incomes, they could get a divorce, and run the father out of the kid’s lives in a meaningful way.
5. Then, one political party decided why not just go straight to “vote buying”, and start paying women welfare money to pop out illegitimate kids in large numbers.
6. Then, the domestic abuse laws get enacted. Now, even when the father or baby daddy is in the home, the goofy broads can do pretty much whatever they want, and if daddy ticks them off, here comes the Domestic Abuse call. I work with my BFF who is a lawyer, and I assure you most (90%) of the Domestic Abuse claims are BeeEss. Women use them to gain financial advantage, or swap one dude for another. The 10% r so that are valid, are still mostly BeeEss because most of the time it is the women who are more violent than the men.
Fathers can’t exercise the authority they need to to keep the family together, and we degenerate as a society. Which is pretty obvious if you look around some.
The question to me is, at what point does the whole shebang start to go wrong. Frankly, I can’t blame the repressive societies for not wanting to become more like us. The Western World presents a crappy justification for becoming more civilized. How do say with a straight face to Pakistan, “You need to be more like us!”
Squeeky Fromm
Girl Reporter
We do not need any of these animals coming across our borders. Mr. Gorbachov: Build Up That Wall. Or is it Mr. Trump whom we want to build the wall? Well, any new President here will need to close our borders to friggin muslims. Keep the Faith Bro.