This may be the single most challenging defense that I have seen in years. Counsel for Edwin Greco Wylie-Biggs argued that the police had failed to prove that drugs seized in the state prison at Fayette, Pennsylvania belonged to Wylie-Biggs. The problem is that the drugs were found in his rectum.
A state Superior Court panel dismissed the argument in five pages. Prosecutors argued that a corrections officer saw another inmate pass something to Wylie-Biggs and he was then given a cavity search. A small plastic bag was found in his rectum containing a blue balloon with synthetic marijuana.
That was enough to get Wylie-Biggs, 36, of Clarion, an extra 3 to 6 years in prison for possessing contraband.
This might have been a case for Nathan Thurm.
Well, in the world of bizarre legal defenses that are successful, as opposed to this one, let’s turn to the Krauts!
Squeeky Fromm
Girl Reporter
PS: Yes, I thought about how apropos, “she conquered, she sawed, she came” would have been, but deemed it too cheezy. . . 🙂
What drugs were found. If it was marijuana, then, with Sessions in charge, his ass is grass.
What would be more interesting is whether or not investigators found David Benson or YNOT and their ilk in the same place as they found the drugs.
So perhaps some other party stowed the drugs in this guy’s butt, just temporarily, for safekeeping? Or maybe they were put there to soak up some local flavoring …..
I hate when other people stash things in my rectum without my knowledge. SO ANNOYING!
The more things change the more they stay the same:
https://jonathanturley.org/2012/02/19/florida-police-make-surprising-discovery-that-man-has-crack-in-his-butt/
But your honor, I don’t know how it got there!
If you are in the pen in Penn then you cannot do drugs.
Once a week he needs a Penn enema.
Bubba told him numerous times that your ass is mine! So of course those weren’t his drugs, they were Bubbas.
Meanwhile, innocent people are in Prison, stashed away in the dungeon of the CMU section, while we discuss the logic of the lowlife drug user.
http://the-trumpet-online.com/framed-fbi-accusing-feds-child-prostitution/
I wonder if the court heard anal argument before deciding the case or simply decided the case on the papers.
It is common for common criminals to claim weapons or contraband found on their persons is not theirs but this is a new one.
The humorous part is that it took five pages to sufficiently explain why the appeal would not be successful.
Rectum?! Damn near killed ’em!