In Alabama, Lakeith Smith, now 18, was the subject of a troubling sentencing after declining a 25 year deal in a felony murder case. After being convicted of felony murder, burglary and theft, he was given a 65 year sentence. Smith however did not kill A’Donte Washington, 16. The police shot Washington as one of the men involved in the break ins. The teen surprised many by smirking at the sentence and was reportedly overheard “I don’t have time for this.” It appears however that is the one thing he has an abundance of.
I have always been uneasy with felony murder cases based on the death of a criminal co-conspirator. In this case, Smith and Washington were connected to two break-ins in 2015 with other men. On Feb. 23, 2015, Washington ran toward officers while pointing a .38 caliber revolver. He was shot and killed by the officer. This is different from the classic felony murder case where a culprit is charged for the death of an innocent party. The rationale behind felony murder provisions was that it would give an incentive to co-conspirators to try to avoid violence not only on their own part but by their cohorts. They all bear the consequences if a store owner or home owner dies. The public policy is not as compelling when police shoot one of the felons.
Judge Sibley Reynolds of Alabama’s 19th Judicial Circuit Court gave Smith back to back sentences of 30 years for murder, 15 years for burglary and 10 years each for two theft convictions.
This story made BBC News.
Had to explain felony-murder to the civilized world.
This sounds like a bar exam question. Yes he can be charged with felony murder under these facts. On to the next question.
Question number two. If you reject a deal can you get screwed. Yes. On to the next question.
Mr Kurtz – Question Three: Will you get screwed? Yes.
I’ve never taken a bar exam, so apologies…
Question number one doesn’t seem obvious to me!
* Lakeith didn’t murder anyone
* His criminal partner didn’t murder anyone either (attempted murder though?)
Is this a novel case of felony murder where neither you nor your criminal partner actually murdered someone?
As someone not versed in criminal law…
Lakeith serving hard time for burglary, theft, etc., that makes sense to me.
Let’s also hold Lakeith responsible for the crimes of his partner, A’Donte. Ok fine that makes sense.
But A’Donte didn’t commit murder, he got into a shootout with police, which would perhaps be attempted murder?
So Lakeith is charged with murder, even though he didn’t commit murder, and his partner didn’t commit murder either… I’m having a hard time understanding the logic here.
This individual is dangerous. He displays no remorse, which is a hallmark of a psychopath. The judge got the sentence right. Incapacitate him by means of incarceration until he is so old that he probably won’t engage in antisocial conduct. And while we’re at it, force some education into him, whether he wants it or not.
Is it possible he didn’t show remorse because he was sentenced for murder, despite neither him nor his criminal partner having actually committed a murder?
Well, let’s flesh this story out a little. There’s a video, so you can watch LaKeith laughing at it all:
Squeeky Fromm
Girl Reporter
LaKeith
Le’Anthony
Jadarrian
Jhavarske
A’Donte
What language do these names come from?
I got one for the posters. Remember the Wash DC Beltway Sniper Lee Boyd Malvo?
Lee was only 17 years old when he & his mentor John Allen Muhammad 41, shot 10 people dead. John was executed & Lee is serving life in prison. But now Lee wants a reduced sentence so he can get out.
“Gang breakins in dwellings at night with shootouts resulting in death”
Was he a veteran?
He was 15 at the time of the crime and that qualifies him as a “boy” at the time of the crime. I am stunned at the implication of racism in your comment. I do believe Mr. Smith was let down by counsel. Excluding the murder, he was convicted of burglary and 2 counts of theft, The total sentence for those alone, excluding any consideration of the felony murder, is 35 years. When you are facing 65 years it would seem wise (to me) to accept the 25 year bargain. So the question arises as to the competence and effectiveness of counsel.
Never underestimate the hubris of criminals that have nothing but time on their hands, waiting for trial, talking to their fellow inmates who all view themselves as legal experts. Many an accused has failed to listen to their lawyers and ended up right where this guy is: in prison for life. We see it all the time, and lawyers try their best. You can’t fix stupid, and arrogant stupid is irreparable.
Liberty2nd, I think this guy should be given a Suspended sentence so you can take him home and he can live with you.
Since to my knowledge most states allow for the unsealing of past juvenile convictions when a major assault felony results in conviction, surely his offender score was high. Given the behavior alleged, this convict’s offense was not a one-off or a one time mistake. Thus, a great sentence could be expected.
I tend to view sentences for recidivist, violent offenders having a need for incapacitation of the offender. Whether he reforms or not is a secondary question as incapacitation removes him from society until he is no longer a physical threat to others. Misdemeanants are a different case. But then again a simple assault can elevate itself into a manslaughter case if a victim dies unexpectedly from say just being punched in the stomach. Yet in this convict’s case, getting into a shootout with the police is an entirely different mindset.
I’m not a big believer in the mathematical theory of sentencing. I think you go by the threat to the public, not how many priors. That’s in the judges discretion and in this case the kid got off light. Gang breakins in dwellings at night with shootouts resulting in death is the very definition of threat to the public.
I agree with you that a person’s threat to the public should be a greater influence during sentencing than many other aggravators. Though one aspect of having a determinate sentencing grid is that there can be more consistency. The trade-off is as you inferred an artificial means to address a human condition.
We ditched our adult parole system around 1983 for all new offenders. One of the reasons was the public’s frustration on either side, either too lenient or too inconsistent. A judge has a range within the grids but if they vary outside the parameters the sentence is subject to appeal by either party. Unfortunately, instead of just one grid for offense | offender score now it has morphed into a different grid for sex / kidnapping offenses and another for drug offenses and probably another one in the future. Then the legislature put in such a mixture of fines and sentence increases that actually requires a computer algorithm to calculate. It’s becoming absurd. It is good to keep the bureaucracy afloat. Good for some, but not me.
Though the grids might provide a veneer of consistency, it is in essence arbitrary. What determines that a Mortgage Fraud crime should be a Seriousness Level III and at the same level as Assault of a Child in the Third Degree while the crime of Unlicensed Practice as an Insurance Professional is higher at level IV?
I think you appoint a judge for a reason. If his or her judgement isn’t sound why have him or her. Nobody knows the case better and justice ought to prevail over consistency . Emerson was right about consistency: it’s the “hobgoblin of little minds adored by little statesmen, philosophers and divines.”
Racism, that insidious creeping disease that affects everyone, to some degree or another. It can be found on this blog and festering in the mind of this sadistic judge. But, hey, statistics prove that this ‘boy’ got what he deserved.
Prove it. Unsupported charges of Racism is what you say when you can’t refute an argument by a more skilled debater. It’s like waiving a white flag.
The only person that mentioned race was you.
messpo-When it looks like a duck, acts like a duck, the judge is a little duckish.
Why Darren, you sound like a snowflake, or a progressive, or a politically correct type; take your pick. Must be that ‘Left Coast’ thing. I calls em like I sees em. The kid’s Black, sentenced to 65 years, for driving the getaway car, supposedly complicit in the death of an innocent bystander, wait no, one of the perps attacking the cops…. DUH. Perhaps there’s more to the story. Perhaps he spit on the judge’s shoe.
Or perhaps, he just laughed his way thru court, and showed no remorse for any of what he did. See the video up above.
Squeeky Fromm
Girl Reporter
Racism might be part of the problem but race is less significant than poverty, desperation, and learning disorders in this type of crime. Learning disorders can be from lead in water, fetal alcohol and fetal drug brain impacts, poor sanitation, injuries, poor nutrition, – all things that happen more to people in poverty.
Chris
We should be tough on crime AND tough on the causes of crime- like you said. The lack of will to do so is evidence of a less- than-enlightened society.
Further proof that frontal lobes don’t develop until age 26.
Neuroscience states age 24 completes brain development.
It varies but the best science I’ve seen is 26. Let’s call it 25.
Part of the deal was that he probably gave up the right to appeal. Now that route is open still.
Smith was the getaway driver sitting in a stolen car with a loaded gun
Officers say they went to check on a house and arrested one of the teens sitting in a stolen car out front with a gun. There was a shootout with 4 other teens who had guns & fired.
How Can One Be an Accessory to a Felony Crime?
The elements for one to be an accessory to a crime varies from state to state. In order to convict a person for being an accessory to a felony, a prosecutor must be able to prove the following four elements:
• The crime was committed by another individual
• The defendant assisted, helped, encouraged, or aided the other person in the commission of the crime
• The defendant acted with intent for the crime to be completed
The Judge reasonably figured that it would take La’Keith 65 years to earn his GED, so that he could turn his life around.
ROTFLMAO!!!
Squeeky Fromm
Girl Reporter
“cruel and unusual punishment”
DB:
No, that’s what he and his posse planned to exact on his victims. What he got is a mild equivalent of justice. If you disagree perhaps you’d like visit from La Keith here and his pals on some enchanted evening in the wee hours.
He didn’t kill anyone. The police did.
No but for eons we have deemed the accomplice guilty of any death they encourage by their participation in a felony. The guy who hires the hit man to kill his wife doesn’t kill anybody either. Sympathetic to him too?
He wasn’t an accomplice of the police.
And the police didn’t murder anyone.
The police killed Mr. Washington.
The law in Alabama is cruelly wrong.
Chris
We should be tough on crime AND tough on the causes of crime- like you said. The lack of will to do so is evidence of a less- than-enlightened society.
mespo
It’s that “deeming” part of your argument which makes it apples and oranges to compare this fact situation to your hired gunman hypo.
I was pointing out we have capital crimes for folks who don’t pull triggers. Lakeith’s case is nothing special.
On the one hand the felon rejected the deal for 25 and took the 65. Being a legal adult ……
Of course what was the deal.
Interesting but with that sort of the record anything from 25 to actually serve to 65 seems ballpark. I wouldn’t like to see a life sentence they get out too soon on that one.
The sentence is too high. The judge needs to be removed from the bench and from practicing law. Is the judge up for re-election? I hope the victim here (defendant) has some friends who can drive by and take aim.
Well that’s the obvious punishment for anyone with whom you disagree.
By the way, you are sick.
By the way. You believe in the Holy Ghost.
And sometimes we make comments in jest. Or is that “gest”? We were not told by the topic here all the facts considered by the Judge. Such as prior arrests and convictions of the defendant. But if two shoplifters take some candy and one is shot by a cop then the other shoplifter should not get 65 years in prison. So all the facts matter.
Liberty2nd – technically, it is the Holy Spirit. 😉
That’s a different religion.
you need to read the Good Book, David Benson, and put down Saul Alinsky.
Did you hear Hillary lost the election? Saul Alinsky methods, boy wonder Obama, none of them could save the lying beached whale
it is a wonder she hasnt been seen in Marcy Park following in Vince’s footsteps
http://www.skinnymoose.com/bbb/files/2008/04/obamabitter.jpg