Michael Bickerton, 49, insisted that his interest in sexual relations with children was purely fantasy. That did not sit well with English police who arrested Bickerton after he drove 130 miles to meet at 10-year-old for sex. It also did not help that he brought a cheerleading outfit with him in the car.
Police had been tracking the online comments of Bickerton who said that he liked “children from the age of eight years”.
He then drove from his home in Stoke-on-Trent to Cambridgeshire where he was arrested. Judge Sean Enright gave Bickerton an eight year sentence and also placed him on the Sex Offenders Register indefinitely with an indefinite Sexual Harm Prevention Order (SHPO).
This headline was completely misleading. I fully expected this story to be about an English man who dressed up in a cheerleader’s outfit and then drove in his car for a long drive to have sex with a 10-year-old girl.
The only true things in the actual article is that it dealt with an English man and drove a long distance. My first disappointment was he did not dress in a cheerleader’s outfit and was, in fact, dressed in normal clothing. My second disappointment was that there was no 10-year-old girl whatsoever.
Such is the nature of clickbait. You never know if it’s actually clickbait until you click on the bait. I feel bad about being tricked, but not as bad as this English man.
Why were the police so willing to arrest him, and the judge so willing to impose sentence? I thought based on Rotherham all sex offenders would get a free pass in Britain. Oh wait, his name is Bickerton, not Muhammed.
I would like to know who wanted the cheerleader outfit, him or the fictional her? Are there 10-year-old cheerleaders and what do they cheer?
Give the near impossibility of catching these felons and the near 100% recidivism rate once they pull their time, what are the legal, ethical or moral arguments for not imposing capital punishment?
If not capital punishment then this:
http://app.leg.wa.gov/RCW/default.aspx?cite=9.92.100
Castration works but I’d say is less satisfying.
There is nowhere near a 100 percent recidivism rate for sex offenders.
This is from the biggest study done:
5 PERCENT OF SEX OFFENDERS REARRESTED FOR ANOTHER SEX CRIME WITHIN 3 YEARS OF PRISON RELEASE
WASHINGTON, D.C.—Within 3 years following their 1994 state prison release, 5.3 percent of sex offenders (men who had committed rape or sexual assault) were rearrested for another sex crime, the Justice Department’s Bureau of Justice Statistics (BJS) announced today. If all crimes are included, 43 percent of sex offenders were rearrested for various offenses.
Sex offenders were less likely than non-sex offenders to be rearrested for any offense—43 percent of sex offenders versus 68 percent of non-sex offenders. But sex offenders were about four times more likely than non-sex offenders to be arrested for another sex crime after their discharge from prison—5.3 percent of sex offenders versus 1.3 percent of non-sex offenders.
Sex offenders with the highest rate of rearrest for another sex offense were those who had a history of prior arrests for various crimes. While 3.3 percent of sex offenders with one prior arrest were arrested for another sex crime after their release, that percentage more than doubled (7.4 percent) for those with 16 or more prior arrests for different types of crimes. Of the released sex offenders who allegedly committed another sex crime, 40 percent perpetrated the new offense within a year or less from their prison discharge.
Of the almost 9,700 sex offenders released in 1994, nearly 4,300 were identified as child molesters. An estimated 3.3 percent of the 4,300 released child molesters were rearrested for another sex crime against a child within 3 years. Most of the children they were alleged to have molested after leaving prison were age 13 or younger.
Other BJS surveys have shown that 70 percent of all men in prison for a sex crime were men whose victim was a child. In almost half of the child-victim cases, the child was the prisoner’s own son or daughter or other relative.
The average sentence imposed on the 9,700 sex offenders was 8 years and, on average, 3 1/2 years of those 8 years were actually served prior to release. The average sentence imposed on the 4,300 child molesters was approximately 7 years and, on average, child molesters were released after serving 3 of the 7 years.
Of the released sex offenders, 3.5 percent were reconvicted for a sex crime within the 3-year follow-up period, 24 percent were reconvicted for any new offense and 38.6 percent were returned to prison, either because they received another prison sentence or because of a parole violation.
Of the 9,700 sex offenders, 67 percent were white males and 32 percent were black males. The percentage rearrested for another sex crime after their release was 5.3 percent of white males and 5.6 percent of black males.
Half of the 9,700 sex offenders were over the age of 35 when released. Recidivism studies typically find that the older the prisoner when released, the lower the rate of recidivism. However, although this study did find the lowest rearrest for a sex crime (3.3 percent) did belong to the oldest sex offenders — 45 years old and older — other age group comparisons were inconsistent. The percentage rearrested for another sex crime after their release was 6.1 percent of those ages 18-24, 5.5 percent of those ages 25-29, 5.8 percent of those ages 30-34, 6.1 percent of those ages 35-39, 5.6 percent of those ages 40-44 and 3.3 percent of those ages 45 or older.
For 85 percent of those sex offenders who were arrested for another sex crime, the arrest occurred in the same state that released them. For the remaining 15 percent, the arrest was in a different state.
The data are from a study that documented levels of recidivism among all 272,111 men and women released from state prisons in 15 states in 1994. The 272,111 included 9,691 male sex offenders. The 9,691 are two-thirds of all the male sex offenders released from state prisons in the United States in 1994. The study represents the largest followup ever conducted of convicted sex offenders following discharge from prison and provides the most comprehensive assessment of their behavior after release. The report, “Recidivism of Sex Offenders Released from Prison in 1994” (NCJ-198281), was written by BJS statisticians Patrick A. Langan, Erica L. Schmitt and Matthew R. Durose. Single copies may be obtained by calling the BJS Clearinghouse at 1-800-851-3420. Following publication this document can be accessed at:
http://bjs.ojp.usdoj.gov/index.cfm?ty=pbdetail&iid=1136
For additional information about Bureau of Justice Statistics reports and programs, please visit the BJS Web site at:
http://bjs.ojp.usdoj.gov/
The Office of Justice Programs (OJP) provides federal leadership in developing the nation’s capacity to prevent and control crime, administer justice, and assist crime victims. OJP is headed by an Assistant Attorney General and comprises 5 component bureaus and 2 offices: the Bureau of Justice Assistance, the Bureau of Justice Statistics, the National Institute of Justice, the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, and the Office for Victims of Crime, as well as the Executive Office for Weed and Seed and the Office of the Police Corps and Law Enforcement Education. Information about OJP programs, publications, and conferences is available on the OJP Web site, ojp.usdoj.gov.
Give the near impossibility of catching these felons and the near 100% recidivism rate once they pull their time, what are the legal, ethical or moral arguments for not imposing capital punishment?
I’ll wager both of your givens are wrong.
It’s anecdotal since only about 25% of the crimes are investigated.