As we wait for the release of the most significant Second Amendment case in over a decade from the Supreme Court (as early as tomorrow), CBS featured Ibram X. Kendi on Face the Nation on gun rights. Host Margaret Brennan discussed with the Boston University professor how “freedom to enslave” was linked to the “freedom to have guns.” There was no push back on that controversial claim or the underlying suggestion that gun ownership is largely a white impulse or practice.
Kendi is the director of the Center for Antiracist Research at Boston University. He has a history of controversial statements like his claim that Justice Amy Coney Barrett’s adoption of two Haitian children raised the image of a “white colonizer” and she appears to use the children as little more than props. He has also declared that terms like “legal vote” are racist. He was recently in the news after explaining why he took a white doll away from his daughter to prevent her from breathing in “the ‘smog’ of white superiority.”
However, this is a historical and constitutional claim that should not go without some factual discussion or response.
Kendi portrayed gun ownership in strictly racial terms:
“Enslaved people were fighting for freedom from slavery, and enslavers were fighting for the freedom to enslave, and in many ways, that sort of contrast still exists today. There are people who are fighting for freedom from assault rifles, freedom from poverty, freedom from exploitation, and there are others who are fighting for freedom to exploit, freedom to have guns, freedom to maintain inequality.”
The portrayal of gun owners as “fighting for freedom to exploit, freedom to have guns, freedom to maintain inequality” received no follow up question or challenge in the interview.
Other academics have made this same historical claim. Historian Carol Anderson claims that
“the Second Amendment “provided the cover, the assurances that Patrick Henry and George Mason needed, that the militias would not be controlled by the federal government, but that they would be controlled by the states and at the beck and call of the states to be able to put down these uprisings.”
The ACLU has echoed such views. NPR breathlessly billed its interview as “Historian Carol Anderson Uncovers The Racist Roots Of The Second Amendment.”
However, the history of the Second Amendment contradicts these claims. States opposed to slavery, like Vermont, Pennsylvania, New Hampshire, New York and Rhode Island, had precursor state constitutional provisions recognizing the right to bear arms. In his famous 1770 defense of Capt. Thomas Preston in the Boston Massacre trial, John Adams declared that British soldiers had a right to defend themselves since “here every private person is authorized to arm himself.” His second cousin and co-Founding Father, Samuel Adams, was vehemently anti-slavery and equally supportive of the right to bear arms.
Samuel Adams proclaimed “the said Constitution shall never be construed to authorize Congress to infringe the just liberty of the press or the rights of conscience; or to prevent the people of The United States who are peaceable citizens from keeping their own arms…”
Guns were viewed as essential in much of America, which was then a frontier nation, needed for food — but also to protect a free people from tyranny and other threats. (The Minutemen at Concord, after all, were not running to a Klan meeting in 1775.) Law enforcement was relatively scarce at the time, even in the more populous states.
This argument is maintained despite the fact that a quarter of African Americans are gun owners (compared with 36 percent of whites) and gun sales have been increasing in the African American community. Some African Americans have long viewed guns as an equalizer, including escaped slave and famed abolitionist Frederick Douglass, who, in an editorial, heralded the power of “a good revolver, a steady hand.” Gun ownership has a long, fiercely defended tradition in the Black community. Indeed, Ida B. Wells, one of the most prominent anti-lynching activists, declared: “The Winchester Rifle deserves a place of honor in every Black home.”
Here is the interview:
181 thoughts on “Boston University Professor: Second Amendment is Based on “Freedom to Enslave””
Ibram Kendi should be investing in Kevlar truth be known. His mind is not just twisted, but his veiled hatred of the human race should disqualify him from the influential position of Professor, for what he is professing is toxic, deadly. His latest statement about the 2nd Amendment is made without evidence and he is unwilling to back it up with proof — the disinformation board at DHS should be shutting him down. And it’s a disgrace that a major University in this country endorses this misguided propagandist. Were I an alumnus from this school of higher learning, I’d terminate my annual contribution and pull support, and let them know exactly why. Shame on Boston….a city at the heart of the beginnings of this nation. And I’m African-American and I find this man a disgrace.
Kendri is what you get when you start teaching “history” dreamed up by black activists. Like thousands of others, he was brain-washed in “black history” and “African-American” history. They exaggerate and manipulate and when they can’t find something to exploit, they invent. Democrats loves them because they get their votes.
Russia won’t stop the war until the interior of Russia suffers like the interior of Ukraine has been suffering. Hit garrisons, bases, factories, etc. This is what NATO should start doing when Lithuania is attacked. Russia has been a source of evil for a hundred years. Russia should have the evil nuked out of it once and for all. Then the world can live without any fear finally.
Apparently, this warmonger is Max Boot’s bootlicker.
Heck, if Russia was still communist, you’d be singing their praise.
YOu will all be skeletons someday.
You mean “we.” You are not immune to your claim.