There is an interesting development in the unauthorized release of confidential sexual assault files involving Indiana GOP candidate Lt. Col. Jennifer-Ruth Green. According to two members of Congress, the Air Force confirmed that the records were leaked just before the midterm elections and now knows who did it.
Green has attracted national attention in a surprisingly competitive race against an incumbent Democratic Rep. Frank Mrvan. The race has Democrats so worried that the Congressional Black Caucus took the controversial step of backing her white opponent despite a stated purpose of being “a non-partisan body made up of African American members of Congress” committed to achieving “access to Black Americans and other marginalized communities.” (Notably, this week, GOP Rep. Mayra Flores was barred from the Congressional Hispanic Caucus).
A spokesperson for the Air Force inspector general, Ann Stefanek, Chief of Media Operations, Department of the Air Force, told Fox News:
“Based on the preliminary findings of an investigation, it appears information was released to a third party by a junior individual who didn’t follow proper procedures and obtain required consent. The Department of the Air Force takes its responsibility to safeguard private information seriously and the matter remains under investigation.”
Obviously, this could have been a simple act of negligence by the Air Force member. Nevertheless, the violation by the Air Force should obviously concern everyone regardless of party affiliation, particularly before a critically important midterm election. One question is the affiliation or motivation of the person seeking these files.
The controversy began when Politico reporter Adam Wren ran a profile article on Green and incorporated the personnel records, which Politico claimed “were obtained by a public records request and provided to Politico by a person outside the Mrvan campaign.” The article detailed how Green was sexually assaulted by an Iraqi man while she was deployed. Green says that she never signed any waiver or permission for the release of her records under the Privacy Act of 1974.
The question is who is this “person outside of the Mrvan campaign” and whether that person was with an opposition research effort or other political operation. Presumably, Politico would have reported if the source was with a partisan operation allied with Mrvan. However, this controversy demands full transparency on such key elements.
Despite being a Democratic stronghold for 90 years, the 1st District is now viewed as a “toss up.”
“Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis’ new election crimes unit has recommended state police open a full criminal investigation into a Democrat whistleblower’s detailed complaint of a long-running, widespread ballot harvesting operation in the African-American communities in politically important central Florida. … She described an intricate system funded by liberal leaning organizations that dispatch ballot brokers into black communities to pressure voters to turn over their ballots. The $10 fee per ballot is divvied up among the parties who help complete the harvesting.”
“The development in Florida adds an explosive new allegation to concerns nationwide that ballot trafficking is widespread in some battleground states, a claim made famous by the research of the conservative watchdog group True the Vote and a documentary released earlier this year by filmmaker Dinesh D’Sousa called “2,000 Mules.”
The article provides the mechanics for illegal ballot harvesting including opening ballot envelopes with steam and correct the votes or throw them out if the vote is against Democrats.
https://justthenews.com/politics-policy/elections/florida-opens-criminal-probe-democrat-whistleblowers-evidence-ballot?utm_source=daily&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=newsletter
Gee, Svelaz is catching so much heat and recriminations today that I feel no need to pile on. Other than he is remarkably more tone deaf than usual. One more thing for the Republican run armed services committee to investigate in January 2023. With Gen Miley as the face of the Pentagon, is it any surprise that this has happened. Used to be that when the power changed hands, heads appeared on pikes, surely there is something more modern that could be used. Maybe we should bring back stocks and have a row of DOJ denizens in stocks , then after a week we have FBI denizens in stocks, and then lastly Pentagon denizens in stocks. After the 3th week it would be just a mixed bag. For the MSM, I would settle for the old American Remedy of tar and feathers. Everyone remember to vote so we can turn this vision into reality.
My wife and I grew up at a time when being a Democrat meant a JFK type democrat — the kind of had a firm grasp of international politics and a keen sense of domestic economics — JFK called for tax reductions to cure economic ills during his time in office — no Democrat has done such a thing since JFK — and so my wife and I are asking, as it is now time to vote once again, are there ANY non-corrupted Democrats in the Democrat Party any longer?
Please grade JFK on his increasing US involvement in SE Asia resulting in the death of 50k US military personnel mostly drafted by threat of force (almost exclusively men,) the death of hundreds of thousands of innocent SE Asian civilians, many more wounded American soldiers and innocents, starvation, mutilation, destruction, the loss of US tax dollars and loss of prestige, plus the fact that we lost the war, etc. Does JFK get a pass?
Monanymous
JFK died 11/63.
Look at troop levels (started to rise in 64, and got material in 65 – Gulf of Tonkin Resolution).
LBJ was president.
History is still relevant.
Very respectfully, that’s the problem: modern Dems think they are still voting for JFK, or at best, Bill Clinton. This includes my own brother. He has not paid attention too much of anything substantial for nigh on 30 years, he still thinks he is fighting Bill O’Reilly or Ann Coulter for saying something stupid on Fox.That is all over, we no longer get to just be comfortable and ignore. This is something we need to accept in America to move forward. I am an Independent that used to vote for Dems (voted for Obama the first time, and regretted it mightily), and I will never vote for that party again because I see what they have become, and I don’t think there is any redemption in any way possible there, personally. This is 2022, not 1968. The party of JFK no longer exists. Whatever the hippy generation believed in has been flipped to the side they despised, and that is just a fact at this point. The Conservatives of the 1950s also no longer exist is any *meaningful* way.
“Two congressmen have said the Air Force has admitted to improperly releasing a Republican House candidate’s personnel records to an “opposition” firm, a leak that included details about the female airmen’s sexual assault during her service.”
https://justthenews.com/government/federal-agencies/air-force-admits-giving-gop-candidates-sexual-assault-details
What SVELAZ and other DEMICRATS are missing with this story is that POLITICO, a left leaning media outfit said, and I quote, “we got this information by filing a FOIA request”, when in fact they did not file such a request.
Hey Svelaz, why did Politico lie? Why would they claim it was public information when it wasn’t? This is an attempted hit piece, you know it, we know it and they know it. Stop lying you political hack.
Now Sevalz, I know you will come back with some asinine reply but please answer my question, why did Politico say they filed a FOIA request when in fact they didn’t?
Who said they didn’t?
Hullbobby, can you link to the politico article where you got that quote from? “We got this information by filing a FOIA request”. Did politico really say what you quote them as saying/
Here’s what politico actually said in the only article I could find on the subject.
“(Green has not contested the authenticity of the documents, which were obtained by a public records request and provided to POLITICO by a person outside the Mrvan campaign.)
https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2022/10/07/shes-black-and-conservative-in-a-democratic-district-is-she-about-to-take-off-politically-00060703
is the this the article you are referring to?
Just the news website reports that the records were obtained by an “opposition” research firm thru FOIA request.
Everyone is calling this a “leak”. But that is not accurate since the organization OR individual who made the FOIA request GOT the information legally. Since it did contain private information and it WAS release as a FOIA request ti was not really “leaked information.
When the air force released the information because of a FOIA request and if, IF it was a mistake which is more likely than not, once it was released it BECAME public information. Nobody was lying here unless you can provide the exact article where you pulled that quote from.
So Hullbooby lied about the quote he mentioned so far he has not been able to provide the source of the quote. Not surprised.
Hey genius, your own cite has Politico saying that it was acquired by a public records request???? What is really wrong with you.
Hy folks, notice that Svelaz still has no issue with the release of a woman’s rape against her own wishes. A servicewoman no less. This is the party of women.
The idea that this unauthorized disclosure (this is the technical term used for this issue) is the result of simple negligence by an employee is unlikely. I worked for a federal agency for 35 years, and I will say that common sense tells us that all federal agencies have the same basic policies re the dissemination of personal information. The disclosure of private, personal information is a very, very big deal and can be considered a serious legal violation. For that reason, employees who work with this information and who handle requests for same have this reality drilled into them for their entire careers. While this can possibly be the result of negligence, the facts and circumstances surrounding this disclosure suggest that negligence is probably not involved. We will find out soon enough.
So much for protecting victimized women. It only works when the woman is a Democrat. If this does not scream desperation, I am not sure what does.
Thank you for pointing this out —- what we can all hope and pray for is that this GOP candidate defeats Mrvan, and turns this district to the Republicans for the first time in, what did they say, 90 years?
Yes, you can actually smell the desperation coming from the prog/left. If fetterman’s debate performance being declared triumphantly successful isn’t enough of a clue I don’t know what could be more indicative of their state of mind other than the painful daily performance of Brandon on the international stage.
I agree with Mary, Richard Lowe, and Alma Carman comments.
I have seen some people comment about how they think their votes do not count or matter, that elections are rigged.
I beg to differ, in watching the Democrats desperation as of late.
Traditional Democrats, like Bill Maher, see it. They see the wokeism and far-Left policies that have taken over the Democrat party. The Asian and Hispanic communities see it.
Us Independents see it too.
Your vote counts. Prove it in the mid-terms.
Setting aside the two egregious acts committed against Lt. Col. Jennifer-Ruth Green -first, the sexual assault itself and second, the leaking of her confidential records by the Air Force, what does the Democratic Party aim to do with this? Name, blame and shame the *victim*? If at all this cowardly and unconscionable act does anything, apart from further dividing the country, it reiterates the fact how corrupted, callous, ignorant and dangerous the Democrats are, as individuals and as a party, not to mention their blatant racism. The White, Black and Hispanic Liberals couldn’t care less about Blacks or Hispanics or any other “POC” as they refer to *Americans* of a different skin color. They simply use them and their “identity” as a shield to deflect criticism against their ignorant and destructive “policies” (if you can even call it that), and to advance their ‘How-to-get-elected-and-stay-in-power-to-get-rich-quick’ scheme. Groups like their ’Congressional black caucus’ and ‘Congressional Hispanic Caucus’ are just a smokescreen to terrorize everyone who dares to question their atrocities and divert funds to their “causes”, which is themselves. “We will defend minorities as long as they are Democrats but we will destroy them if they are conservatives” is not a great political manifesto and definitely not what America stands or should stand for.
Hopefully this leaking of Lt. Col. Jennifer-Ruth Green’s sexual assault records will blow up on the faces of the Democrats and name, blame and shame *them*, instead of their intended target -a brave American patriot fighting the unwanted wars her country’s feckless and greedy politicians got her into. Hope she crushes her Democratic opponent in the mid-terms and helps bring some much needed sanity into the House that is supposed to represent the American people.
“Hopefully this leaking of Lt. Col. Jennifer-Ruth Green’s sexual assault records will blow up on the faces of the Democrats and name, blame and shame *them*, instead of their intended target -a brave American patriot fighting the unwanted wars her country’s feckless and greedy politicians got her into.”
Lin, this wasn’t a leak. The information was legally obtained and shared. Was it ethical, no. But that is politics today and that includes both republicans and democrats. This won’t “blow up in their faces”. This has been the name of the game for decades.
(I did not make the above comment, I think you meant “Lucy?” A little quick on the trigger, are you?
Lin, he is more than quick on the trigger. How does he know “The information was legally obtained and shared. “? He doesn’t. Almost everything he says is made up.
What has happened to our military is another thing that made my jaw drop, there is no question these tendrils that have wrapped around everything are not the work of Joe Puddin’. And China and Russia’s armed forces are not wasting their time on this nonsense, I can tell you that much. Barack Obama is one of the worst things ever to happen to the USA, that all blew the lid right off of Pandora’s box.
How did someone think using this leaked information was a good idea?
What are the Dems to gain?
Is this them trying to use this information that she is not up to the task?
But Fetterman is?
What is the play here?
Regardless, the person who leaked the information, the person/outlet who made this into a “newsworthy” article are disgusting.
Politics is a very dirty business. Taking advantage of a mistake is still part of politics anywhere by any party.
So Svelaz, THE DEMOCRAT, has no issue with an opposition party, THE DEMOCRATS, leaking private information about a SEXUAL ASSAULT, i.e. RAPE, in order to somehow besmirch a Republican. Ah yes, the party of women.
Hey Svelaz, no comment about the gist of the story? No outrage at this attack on a rape victim? Nope, Svelaz just says, in essence, suck it up lady, politics ain’t beanbag. Nice guy.
Hullbooby,
“Hey Svelaz, no comment about the gist of the story? No outrage at this attack on a rape victim? Nope, Svelaz just says, in essence, suck it up lady, politics ain’t beanbag. Nice guy.”
Hey dumba$$ she wasn’t raped and her information was not leaked. It was legally obtained thru a FOIA request. Pay attention. BTW, I’m a Republican.
Hey Svelaz, IT WAS NOT LEGALLY OBTAINED, can you read? The AF AG said it was an illegal leak even as Politico says it was a FOIA request.
Folks, notice how DEMOCRAT Svelaz says, “it was not a rape” since I guess it was just a sexual assault by an Iraqi guy against an American woman in our AF.
Wow, Svelaz, you made yourself look even worse than usual today. A lying attacker of an assault victim in uniform. What a loser.
It’s not a mistake when they do it purposely. Progressives are lying corrupt selfish thugs.
Go ahead, deflect from the role of the media in this. Many, but not all, politicians, go negative to different degrees. But the media used to be the wall for unfair nonsense. Then it became a partisan filter. And finally the media is a fully partisan participant. I see an executive order pulling NYT v. Sullivan protection from the bad media actors.
@Svelaz
That you have the time to show up her everyday and retort virtually every comment is pretty much proof positive that you are paid to do so (and if so, I bet you believe you are doing something ‘righteous’, because you are a brainwashed tool), and I would be very surprised if you, ‘Anonymous’, Gigi, et. al. were not working for the same troll farm or are even possibly the same person. If you *aren’t* a paid troll, I have never seen anyone so bored, privileged, and contrary in my life. I’m not sorry you are here; everyone deserves a voice, but what in the actual h double hockey sticks is the point? This is a legal blog, not Vice. We discuss reality, not ‘feeling’-invoked projection. I comment once or twice a day, maybe more on weekends when I have the time, and I do so because I respect the Professor and the commenters and greatly appreciate his and their service to the world. That does not exclude dissenting opinions to anyone but you and your ilk, because apparently, you get literally the same DNC list of talking points every morning as the WH, the MSM, and virtually all of social media. So, spare us. You aren’t even cellophane; somehow you make burlap transparent. What it is, is sad. You are sad.
James, hasn’t it occurred to you that might just be on vacation and have time to do a lot of things including posting here?
“This is a legal blog, not Vice. We discuss reality, not ‘feeling’-invoked projection. I comment once or twice a day, maybe more on weekends when I have the time, and I do so because I respect the Professor and the commenters and greatly appreciate his and their service to the world.”
No $hit Sherlock, did you figure that out all by yourself? I can post on here whenever I want and because it’s not just a “legal blog” it’s also a forum where debate and discussions can be had. The majority of Turley’s readers here are just griping about their daily grievances about “leftists”, “dimocrats”, “the woke crowd” etc, etc, etc. It’s literally a free for all once the comments get going. I’m doing nothing different than what everyone else here does. If you don’t like it. You are free to go somewhere else or just ignore me as others can do. Your choice.
Upstatefarmer, this was not leaked. This was legally obtained information thru a FOIA request. It is more likely the request was granted in error and by the time they realized it it was too late.
Air Force admits giving GOP candidate’s sexual assault details to ‘opposition’ firm, Republicans say
https://justthenews.com/government/federal-agencies/air-force-admits-giving-gop-candidates-sexual-assault-details
“This was legally obtained information thru a FOIA “
More made up BS.
It’s terrible that she was assaulted and it was terrible that someone leaked the information but what is the point? Is someone saying she released it to gain sympathy? Or that they other guy released it to??????
Whoever sought the records was after her fitness reports, which as I recall from other sources were less than flattering. Either someone who served with her tipped the opposition or it was just a fishing operation (unlikely, I think, but possible). The sexual assault records were incidental to those, and the opposition released them along with the other records thinking they would damage her.
Read the Politico article. She was sexually assaulted by an Iraqi soldier. She says she was advised not to file a formal complaint about the assault to keep relations smooth with the Iraqi government. She ignored that advice and reported the sexual assault incident. She had excellent performance evaluations until she reported the sexual assault. After that, her performance evaluations went south and her career trajectory suffered. She appealed and ultimately got her career back on track.
Now, all of this comes public AFTER she wins the Republican primary. So a Democrat likely leaked it to paint her as a poor performer to try to influence the close election. Of course, the “egregious error” explanation is also possible. Sure, it’s about as likely as the probability that a hummingbird can fly to Mars with Washington Monument tied to its tail. Anything’s possible when you aren’t allowed to engage in deductive reasoning.
It’s been reported that the Air Force investigation has uncovered the identity of the leaker. That person’s identity has not leaked. Odd.
Anonymous says,
“Read the Politico article. She was sexually assaulted by an Iraqi soldier. She says she was advised not to file a formal complaint about the assault to keep relations smooth with the Iraqi government. She ignored that advice and reported the sexual assault incident. She had excellent performance evaluations until she reported the sexual assault. After that, her performance evaluations went south and her career trajectory suffered.’
Apparently you didn’t read carefully. She had bad performance reviews BEFORE she reported the sexual assault incident. Here’s what the article actually said,
“Green’s mostly stellar military record took an unexpected hit in early 2010, according to military records. In an evaluation of her performance spanning from March 15, 2009 to Dec. 15, 2009, she received a “does not meet standards” rating in leadership skills, professional qualities, and judgment and decisions. The evaluation centered on “two instances of lacking judgment while deployed; handling your weapon and wandering away while at a [forward operating base]. In the first case, she was given a letter of counseling for loading her weapon inside a military facility. The second more serious incident occurred in September, according to her military records, when she and a small group of officers visited the national training center. She left the group to climb into a cramped guard tower where Green says an Iraqi serviceman sexually assaulted her by grabbing her breast and exposing himself.“
Her poor performance reviews were started in March 15,2009. She didn’t report the incident until September. Since the reports span from March to December it is clear that she had issues before the incident in September. So she wasn’t given bad marks for performance or her leadership after reporting the sexual assault incident.
What still remains relevant is that she indeed prevailed despite the bad marks on her record.
The release of her information is more than likely a simple error because it was released under a FOIA request and the military personnel who handled the request may simply have thought this was allowed.
Just background, there usually are designated locations where barring exigent circumstances, weapons (pistols, rifles, shotguns, etc) are loaded or unloaded. They are called clearing barrels in the USAF. It looks like she failed to follow instructions and not use a clearing barrel, hence the Letter of Counseling. The “wandering away” is bad not only because of what happened to her, it left her battle buddy exposed as well.
Progressives are for women’s rights, except for republican women. They are vile, they will do anything for a political win.
What makes you think it was a “progressive” or a “democrat” who released the information? Nobody knows the party affiliation of the person who released the info. All we know is that it was a junior officer or low ranking individual I don’t know if you can all an military officer a “progressive” when the majority of those in the military maybe more conservative than liberal. No?
Today, this type of action is more characteristic of the left rather than the right.
The right does it all the time. Digging for dirt on opponents is common in the ugly world of politics. This is not exclusive to democrats. If Hillary Clinton’s medical files were leaked it’s guaranteed that republican political operatives would have exploited it to it’s fullest. It IS expected and SHOULD be expected.
Look at how republicans are actively searching and using Hunter Biden’s addiction problems and using FOIA requests to get embarrassing and incriminating information. That is the dirty nature of politics regardless of which party does it.
I have obtained exclusive video footage of Svelaz trying to empty the ocean in his efforts to carry water for Democrats.
So says the man without any facts.
Hunter is pertinent only because his father has been a politician on the take for almost 50 years and has been lining his pockets. Yes, everyone should be looking at Hunter’s laptop and other things to get to the bottom of the corrupt President now leading our country toward disaster.
“Hunter is pertinent only because his father has been a politician on the take for almost 50 years and has been lining his pockets. Yes, everyone should be looking at Hunter’s laptop and other things to get to the bottom of the corrupt President now leading our country toward disaster.”
And yet you still have zero proof of that claim. Influence peddling is not illegal. Making millions from foreign companies and making deals is not illegal either.
President Biden has released his tax returns to the public. If he was as corrupt as you say he was we would have noticed it on his returns. Trump on the other hand fought very hard to keep his tax records secret because he had more to hide than Biden. Which do you think would be more suspicious?
Svelaz, you are lousy at math and statistics.
You are also repetitive while repeating half an idea.” Influence peddling is not illegal,” unless one is a government employee lining his own pockets. That is the claim.
“President Biden has released his tax returns to the public.”
As proven repeatedly on this blog by multiple people, you know very little about taxes or finance. Biden is a crook, but you are too limited to figure that out, even with prompting.
“You are also repetitive while repeating half an idea.” Influence peddling is not illegal,” unless one is a government employee lining his own pockets. That is the claim.”
And yet the claim is still not proving what exactly is the crime. A government employee who lines his own pockets in legal deals is not a crime. Especially when they are NOT in office like Joe Biden was when he allegedly was supposed to get 10% of a legal investment deal.
“Biden is a crook, but you are too limited to figure that out, even with prompting.”
And still you have no evidence of any articulable crime you can point to for your claim to be true.
No one said Joe Biden was convicted. There is enough evidence that he should be deeply investigated using all means possible. I think we can say with confidence enough will be found to charge him criminally.
Are you able to understand what others are saying? Apparently not.
Hunter is critical because he typed that he and his criminal conspirators had to give the POTUS 10% kickback to daddy then VP Joe Biden (“the Big Guy”) for allowing Hunter to introduce foreign billionaires including PRC members to Joe, who did the bidding of the PRC and other foreign operatives.
For anyone who thinks Zelensky took office legally in Ukraine, that Ukraine is a legal democracy, that Ukraine did not illegally force out its last President by threat of imminent death, I have a red bridge for sale in San Francisco Bay.
“Hunter is critical because he typed that he and his criminal conspirators had to give the POTUS 10% kickback to daddy then VP Joe Biden (“the Big Guy”) for allowing Hunter to introduce foreign billionaires including PRC members to Joe, who did the bidding of the PRC and other foreign operatives.”
There was nothing criminal about getting 10% of an investment’s return. Joe Biden was not VP at the time. Introducing foreign billionaires to Joe Biden is a crime? How?
You have never been able to articulate exactly what crimes have been committed and what laws have been broken. All you have been able to muster out is RICO something something and influence peddling which unfortunately for you it’s NOT illegal. So…what exactly is the criminal activity here?
House investigators: Chinese intel may have compromised Hunter Biden during gas deals
https://justthenews.com/accountability/russia-and-ukraine-scandals/thuhouse-investigators-chinese-intel-may-have
Oh good grief. These “investigators” are just two Republican lawmakers who are alleging a lot of things without evidence. Their “proof” consists of innuendo and assumptions based on allegations that Hunter Biden MAY have been compromised without any definitive proof. There is a reason why the FBI isn’t taking this seriously. Because they know these two guys are trotting out old allegations and innuendoes. This is old news.
“Hunter Biden MAY have been compromised”
Get it right. It’s Joe Biden who was compromised and there is plenty of evidence but he is a protected pawn.
“Obviously, this could have been a simple act of negligence by the Air Force member. Nevertheless, the violation by the Air Force should obviously concern everyone regardless of party affiliation, particularly before a critically important midterm election. One question is the affiliation or motivation of the person seeking these files.”
**********************************
No, it couldn’t. Timing and immoral rectitude of the Dims says it wasn’t “negligence.” (And where’s all the humiliation intending leaks about Dim candidates, btw?) As for it being of “obvious concern” for “everyone regardless of party affiliation” note the dearth of the publicly spoken outrage from the once virtuously posturing “me too” Dims and see “immoral rectitude” above. As for motivation? Well, I’m consulting any handy and sentient fifth-grader for the obvious answer.
Mespo, how do we know that the person who released the information was a democrat or republican? Turley is insinuating ever so lightly that this had a political motivation even after admitting that this might just have been a simple mistake. Leave it to Turley to make a mountain out of a mole hill over an alleged mistake.
Turley seems to be creating a “controversy” by making these thinly veiled insinuations that there was a political motive behind the release of the information. Notice how he focused on the congressional black caucus and saying that it was odd that they were supporting a white candidate. Clearly he is race baiting his readers here by mentioning race where it is completely irrelevant. What rules say that they can’t support a white candidate if they want to?
It’s notable that Turley only mentions the party affiliation of the opponent but he never mentions the party affiliation of Lt. Col. Green. Turley is playing to his more gullible readers political biases than the fact that this may just have been a simple mistake.
“Notice how he focused on the congressional black caucus and saying that it was odd that they were supporting a white candidate. Clearly he is race baiting his readers here by mentioning race where it is completely irrelevant.” The Conned black and hispanic caucuses are exposed as BS identitarian crap groups meant only for dnc lemmings and you say that race there is irrelevant and Turley is creating a controversy? HAHAHA, keep posting, you are doing a world of good…lol.
“…a simple mistake.” LOL, gotta love the daily clown show.
“gullible readers” – they always project.
Svelaz eagerly states that “…Turley only mentions the party affiliation of the opponent but he never mentions the party affiliation of Lt. Col. Green. Turley is playing to his more gullible readers political biases…” (last para)
Dear, dear Svelaz: Did you happen to read the TITLE of Turley’s post, i.e., …”…Release of Confidential Sexual Assault Records of Indiana GOP Candidate Jennifer-Ruth Green.?????” He REPEATS the party affiliation in the very first sentence.
Sometimes I wonder how the good professor handles these silly partisan musings in his class?
Lin,
Yeah. That right there.
Thank you for pointing that out.
Lin, you are absolutely correct. I did not pay attention to the “GOP candidate”. I was clearly wrong here and I admit I did not read that as carefully as I should have. I was wrong on that claim.
Sevvy:
“Mespo, how do we know that the person who released the information was a democrat or republican? ”
**************************
Cui Bono?
Mespo, the only thing identifying who got the information according to justthenews website is an opposition research organization. They could be just an organization. Making money for the information. Or a partisan organization. What matters is that they legally obtained the information because the Air Force made a mistake in releasing it in the first place. Once they got the information it became public record and can be used by anyone who obtains it.
I very much would like to know who the orchestra leader of the national cabal breaking down our nation. I can’t bring myself to believe it’s our ice cream cone loving President.
Be careful there, you don’t want to lose an adidas contract, do you?
Margot:
Start with WEF.
Are we still waiting for Roberts to find the SCOTUS leaker?
As scummy as the leak is, the Airforce made short work of identifying the responsible person.
Iowan2, it is more likely this was just a mistake.
As for the SCOTUS leak? They are never going to find out who did it. It has been too long and obviously by now they still don’t know who did it. It’s old news by now and irrelevant. That is why you are not hearing any more about it.
Looks like the DNC leadership is throwing the Conned black and hispanic caucuses under the bus in their flailing to maintain power.
It’s all so transparently pathetic from both the leadership and the caucuses. It’s an abusive relationship between puppeteers and puppets.
This was on purpose and the WOKE Air Force went ahead to release info and then said its an error, RIGHT. Its the Corrupt DEMS and Woke Air Force/US Military. Use anything they can to retain power. She just might win, she has a good chance and this might bckfire on the DEM’s.
I continue to be amazed how every incident of this nature runs in one direction.
Again and again the Democrats unquenchable thirst for power is revealed. They are committed not to beating their opposition at the polls but destroying anything that stands in their way. They are no different than the bloodthirsty regimes of Mao’s Red Guard, Stalin’s NKVD, or Hitler’s Youth. It’s a sad day we’ve come to but the only way to save our republic is to answer with the truth and expose them for what they are. If there is no punishment for this it will be another example of Biden Administration’s and the DNC’s semi fascism in action.
Their entire philosophy is that the ends justify the means, which is antithetical to civilized society in general. What is worse is that in the 60s the ends changed from simply wrong-headed solution seeking to simply acquiring political power.
What a disgusting group of people. It is pathetic how many stupid lemmings fall for their BS despite the decades of evidence.
Just like the leak of Trump’s tax returns, nothing will happen. It’s Washington. Republicans are fair game. Whatever it takes.
Wiseoldlawyer, this is now life in Doublestandardstan.