Media

Microsoft Company Pushed Discredited GDI Blacklist Targeting Conservative and Libertarian Sites

I have been writing about the controversial funding of the Global Disinformation Index by the congressionally-created and federally funded National Endowment for Democracy. I recently disclosed that, after my Hill column ran, NED contacted me to say that it was stopping any further funding of the GDI. However, major questions still remain on the NED’s funding of this highly flawed scoring system that targeted conservative and libertarian sites. This is an effort to deter advertisers from supporting these sites while listing highly liberal sites like Huffington Post as some of the most reliable sources. It appears that a Microsoft company is supporting this effort. According to the Washington Examiner, Microsoft’s Xandr is running a blacklist based on the discredited GDI listing. However, it includes additional sites popular with conservatives, libertarians, and independents beyond the ten most dangerous sites flagged by GDI. After Microsoft’s use of the blacklist was revealed, the company removed the listing.

It now appears that NED is not the only federally funded group supporting GDI. The State Department also supports the Global Engagement Center, which gave GDI funds for this blacklisting effort. It also includes sites like the Drudge Report, the Washington Examiner, the Washington Times, and sites associates with individual figures like Sean Hannity and Mike Huckabee.

The Democratic members, writers, and pundits have increasingly embraced blacklisting of conservatives and even justices. There is also a chilling turn toward labeling critics as Russian sympathizers and “Putin lovers” after they called for investigations into government censorship efforts. In attacks that increasingly sound like Red Scare 2.0, Democrats are denouncing anyone who questions efforts to censor social media.

For years, the Democrats pushed a Russian collusion theory that collapsed. It was later disclosed that the Clinton campaign hid and then lied about funding the infamous Steele Dossier. Nevertheless, people like Carter Page were falsely accused of being Russian agents and critics of the investigation labeled as Russian apologists. Ironically, the FBI was warned that the dossier appeared to be the result of Russian disinformation and relied on a presumed Russian agent.

If anything, my warning of McCarthy-like attacks and measures seemed to be taken more as a suggestion than an admonition by some. Soon after the end of the hearing, MSNBC contributor and former Sen. Claire McCaskill appeared on MSNBC to denounce the member witnesses (Sen. Chuck Grassley, Sen. Ron Johnson, and former Rep. Gabbard) as “Putin apologists” and Putin lovers.

She exclaimed, “I mean, look at this, I mean, all three of those politicians are Putin apologists. I mean, Tulsi Gabbard loves Putin.” (For the record, she also attacked me as not being “a real lawyer.”)

Microsoft’s involvement in the blacklisting is particularly concerning. This is a company with many conservative, libertarian, and independent customers. Yet, it is actively seeking to blacklist sites through this transparently biased scoring system.  It is part of a chilling alliance of government, corporate, media, and academic interests to censor or control political speech on the Internet.

The fact that the company removed the list after public outcry does not relieve concerns over the original support for the blacklisting. The free speech community is caught in a never-ending Whac-A-Mole game. We hit a Disinformation Governance Board and a Disinformation Index pops up. These agencies, groups, and companies backpedal but seem to then find other ways to control or censor speech. This is why, despite fierce Democratic opposition, the House needs to move forward with an investigation into the full scope of government efforts to regulate or censor speech.

62 thoughts on “Microsoft Company Pushed Discredited GDI Blacklist Targeting Conservative and Libertarian Sites”

  1. In almost ALL 70 years on this earth, never thought I would have to live through all the political CRAP that is going on today. Cant all you people just STOP the hate and get along, we sent all these folks to the House and Senate to speak for us. That sure isnt whats being done. May be time to clean the floors and trash all those that cant for for the people in a like fashion. I for one am just sick and tired of it. As opinions ours and yours are our opinions, like buttholes everyone has one.

  2. In pretty sure the jury was told how a.c. Isn’t exactly zulu? Or is that failure of counsel appeal? But here counsel failed. Where was their expert on dusk? And a.c. Phones bogus. We heard voices that defy common sense the chickens would be foisted already sled are up the tape. They lie! The tape is bogus! Anyone witg g chickens knows it wasn’t at the time! Whatever that means it means don’t gas l i don’t have to stand for this. Light us!?I saw the big hands by me calvert..And his threatened way. And the grewing left his brief case by me. I don’t know these ppl. And my ppl know that.

    1. Cool, I can now see I just had to give the beta cucks a kick down where men used to have balls, then it’s will post.

  4. Because governments increasingly add to their powers over the lives of their citizens, it is to be expected they will always effort to regulate or censor speech. Of course our elected congressional representatives should move forward with an investigation into the full scope of government efforts to regulate or censor speech. It’s a no brainer, if indeed they are [our] representatives and not pawns for someone or something else.

    1. “It’s the [Constitution], stupid!”

      – James Carville
      _____________

      “It’s the [Judicial Review], stupid.”

      – James Carville
      _____________

      Government exists to provide maximal freedom to individuals, through the provision of security and infrastructure, while being severely limited and restricted itself.

      The judicial branch exists to assure that the legislative and executive branches strictly comport with the clear meaning and intent of the Constitution.

      It doesn’t and it doesn’t.

      The judicial branch has no power to amend, legislate, modify legislation, or modify legislation through “interpretation.”

      Rights and freedoms are absolute; infliction of bodily injury and property damage constitutes an actionable criminal and/or civil violation.

  6. An Observation: Please notice how the so-called “progressive” troll hijacked the discussion. Although the professor’s column was about The Global Disinformation Index, the discussion quickly became unproductive about which side lies more, and Ukraine pro and con.
    A Suggestion: Ignore the so-called “progressive” trolls. Let’s have a discussion about the point Professor Turley is making instead.
    Thanks.

    1. I believe I know of whom you speak, and expect they do as well. The problem is there are more than just one. Professor Turley allows them a voice on his blog, yet they do not use it to make convincing arguments. Instead they show us what they are. Their intolerance for perspectives not their own and the animus they express for the professor consumes them to such an extent that they most always go beyond what is required or sufficient. There is debate and there is attack. They suffer too little of the former and too much of the latter.

      1. Ron A. Hoffman,

        “Their intolerance for perspectives not their own and the animus they express for the professor consumes them to such an extent that they most always go beyond what is required or sufficient.”

        You have it backwards. It’s those who seem “annoyed” at the fact that we do post a countervailing point of view. Often it’s criticism of obvious mischaracterization or hypocrisy. All of which are fair game when Turley posts a column expressing his views or opinions. There are others here who post more frequently and often off topic.

        1. I can accept that you have good intentions, but my concern for you and others is that your “countervailing points of view” are offered with too much antipathy. You come across as hostile and combative toward the professor, and the antagonism shown leaves your argumentation wanting. You might be able to prevail over Turley, but surely not by being contentious with him. It is possible to quarrel without being quarrelsome.

  7. If a book is banned or red listed, my first inclination is to purchase and read the paperback version of the book. Several of the banned books I have are well written and full of sources. This “rating” system could also be a nice guide for where to seek opposing points of view.

    The reason for the red listing is that those who are corrupt do not wish for the information seeker to see their rottenness not to discover that that their narrative is thinly supported.

    If there is nothing to hide, if a thing is founded on truth, it will withstand scrutiny.

  8. As an aside: Pete Buttigieg complained today when approached by a polite reporter and asked to comment on the train derailment. He then took a picture (?) of the reporter for some unknown reason.

    I bring this up because it was Democrats (remember Maxine Waters) telling everyone to get in the faces of Cabinet members and we had Sarah Huckabee and the Homeland Security head get forced out of RESTAURANTS. But Pete bristled at a very polite reporter asking a legitimate question. Welcome to Doublestandardstan (TM).

    1. Pete is a featherweight. He is in way over his head or abilities. He is incompetent and it shows. Sadly, as a result, his inactions have harmed many.

  9. “ It also includes sites like the Drudge Report, the Washington Examiner, the Washington Times, and sites associates with individual figures like Sean Hannity and Mike Huckabee.”

    The GDI wasn’t wrong about Hannity. He did disinform his viewers while knowing what he was telling them was BS.

    “ Fellow host Ingraham told Carlson that Powell was “a complete nut. No one will work with her. Ditto with Rudy,” referring to the former New York mayor and Trump supporter Rudy Giuliani.
    Hannity, meanwhile, said in a deposition “that whole narrative that Sidney was pushing, I did not believe it for one second”, according to Dominion’s filing. Other internal communications revealed that Fox News executives, hosts and researchers used phrases including “mind-blowingly nuts”, “totally off the rails” and “completely BS” to describe the false election theories they were publicly promoting.“

    https://amp.theguardian.com/media/2023/feb/17/fox-news-hosts-dominion-lawsuit-trump-election-fraud-tucker-carlson-sean-hannity-laura-ingraham

    Fox News knew and they still told their viewers that the election was stolen and there was massive voter fraud. That certainly would put Fox News right at the top of the GDI because it would be accurate. Turley still hasn’t gotten the courage to discuss his employers complete failure at journalistic integrity. They censored the truth from their viewers.

    1. Svelaz, if they want to publish a blacklist of conservative sights I say let them have at it. I just don’t want it supported by my tax dollars. This is the part that you continue to dance around. You say well its only 330,000 dollars. To you the morality of the government supporting censorship doesn’t come into question. We are not surprised. After all. You said that little boys and little girls should use the sam restrooms not thinking that big men will use the same restrooms. We appreciate your input.

      1. Tit, I didn’t dance around anything. YOU claimed the NED gave the GDI $330 million. Which was not true. The NED gave the GDI less than $330,000. That amount was the total given be the NED and other organization. It’s not even known if tax dollars were actually used in that grant since the NED gets funding from private entities as well.

        “ You said that little boys and little girls should use the sam restrooms not thinking that big men will use the same restrooms. We appreciate your input.”

        Tit, quit lying. I didn’t say that at all. We all know how you resort to lying when you can’t make a decent argument.

    3. Svelaz – it was impossible for Hannity, or anyone else at Fox, to “know” whether the election was stolen without examining the provinence of the millions of the mail-in ballots accepted by election officials. Neither they nor you have examined those ballots.

      1. If the election is not begun and completed on one DAY, one 24-hour period, and not held in a specific and particular PLACE, the election is unconstitutional and stolen.

        If citizens do not present at a polling place and are not identified, the election is stolen.

        Vote by mail is unconstitutional.

        Failure to present at a polling place in person, and improperly and insufficiently identifying voters are unconstitutional acts.
        _________________________________________________________________________________________________

        Article I, Section 4

        The Times, Places and Manner of holding Elections for Senators and Representatives, shall be prescribed in each State by the Legislature thereof; but the Congress may at any time by Law make or alter such Regulations, except as to the Places of choosing Senators.
        ____________________________________________________________________

        2 U.S. Code § 7 – Time of election

        The Tuesday next after the 1st Monday in November, in every even numbered year, is established as the day for the election, in each of the States and Territories of the United States, of Representatives and Delegates to the Congress commencing on the 3d day of January next thereafter.

      2. Edward, they already knew Trump’s claims were without evidence. They knew it was BS.

        The mail-in ballot issue was part of that BS. They were all examined. That’s why there has been no evidence to present. Because it was all BS and Fox News knew early on.

  10. Turley sure loves to mischaracterize. The GDI has not been discredited. The GDI is very accurate. That’s why Turley is being highly critical of it. Fox News has already been exposed as a full on BS factory. So has the NY post since it’s also owned by the same person Rupert Murdoch. Turley is carefully ignoring the problems facing Fox News and the revelations that it knowingly lied to it’s viewers in pursuit of ratings and preventing another BS factory, Newsmax from syphoning viewers.

    He claims it’s highly flawed but doesn’t point out how or why. Turley is simply trying to deflect from the fact that the GDI is not wrong on it’s rankings. The GDI is no different than any other index created by organizations such as the Heritage Foundation or any other libertarian or conservative non-profit. They do the same thing, listing things by rank on freedom indexes “suggesting” organizations, groups, or even lawmakers to avoid by noting how anti-something they are. It’s no different than what the GDI does.

    The GDI does NOT tell you who to avoid or not to advertise with who. All it does is ranks organizations according to how much disinformation or misinformation they produce or repeat. As is with conservative indexes anyone can use them for however they see fit. If they want to use it to determine where to advertise it’s certainly their choice.

    Turley falsely characterizes the GDI targets conservative and libertarian sites. They target everything, the problem is most sites that do engage in disinformation ARE conservative and libertarian sites. They high rankings mean it’s mostly those site because they mostly engage in disinformation. As noted above Fox News makes the perfect example of why the GDI is pretty accurate. Newsmax which peddled a lot of disinformation about the 2020 election and Fox News competing with it by peddling the same stuff they KNEW was false is exactly why they rank high on that list. We already have evidence they deliberately engaged in disseminating disinformation. Turley can’t claim the GDI is flawed.

    It’s not censorship and it’s not forcing advertisers or telling them to avoid where to advertise. It’s an index. Not a blacklist.

    1. Svelaz we get it. All of us who watch the most watched news network are just being fed disinformation. I see we are the dupes and you are the anointed one. I genuflect before your superiority. How could I have missed that you are the know all see all illuminate. Shush there are Democrats who watch Fox News. Read em and weep your highness. https://www.forbes.com/sites/markjoyella/2023/02/01/fox-news-hits-23rd-consecutive-month-as-most-watched-in-cable-news-as-cnn-sees-gains-in-january/?sh=eb6dabb5f594

      1. Svelaz has never had a disagreement with Al Sharpton, Elie Mystal or Rachel Maddow, three know liars and conspiracy nuts. Mystal is an American hating racist…but whatever.

        1. Hullbobby, those people are not liars and conspiracy nuts. You’re projecting those who YOU listen to.

          You can’t seem to even acknowledge the simple fact that Fox News was lying to everyone when they knew what they were telling you was pure BS. That’s why so many other conservative and libertarian “think tanks” and non-profits kept arguing that the election was stolen. Fox News kept supporting and enabling the BS that allowed them to keep arguing about voter fraud and stolen elections when none of it was true.

          Think about it. Multiple audits in Georgia, Arizona, and Pennsylvania all showed no evidence of voter massive voter fraud. Multiple hand recounts and even audits by Republican appointed outfits. Multiple courts dismissing claims because of a lack of evidence. Attorney General Barr stating there is not evidence of voter fraud, even the grand jury in the Georgia case voting unanimously that there was a no voter fraud. They recommended perjury charges on those who claimed voter fraud. Now we have Fox News admitting in court documents that they KNEW Trump’s voter fraud claims were complete BS.

          All this points to the simple fact that you were being lied to this whole time. You were taken for a ride in the Trump chump express while he picked your pockets for “donations”.

      2. Tit,

        “ All of us who watch the most watched news network are just being fed disinformation.”

        No, you don’t get it. You were being lied to your face the whole time Fox News was telling you the election was stolen and there was voter fraud.

        The link PROVES why Fox News was much more worried about ratings than telling you the truth. The need to keep prized claim as the “most watched news network”, the very essence of their brand above all else is exactly why they consciously chose to lie to your face instead of telling you what they KNEW to be the truth, that Trump’s claims were BS. THAT was their primary motivation, YOUR undivided gullible attention so they can keep their ratings up and they succeed every time because they know their viewers, those like you, are incredibly gullible and fickle.

        They lied to your face and you are still oblivious to that fact. That is why they love viewers like you, stupid and gullible, a winning combination for ratings.

    2. Look up the word succinct, and you’ll find a new meaning for your miserable life. Why don’t you get your own blog and stop taking up valuable space with your banal dribbling’s.

      1. Daniel J, hey it’s a free speech blog. I find it ironic that many complain about my postings when there are others who equally post as much as I do. I suspect that my presence is only annoying because I pose a different point of view or offer a counter argument to Turley’s’ or someone else’s. That is the entire point of being able to post on this blog. It’s all about free speech and all, right?

    3. “They (sic) high rankings mean it’s mostly those site because they mostly” disagree with the Left.

      Now the statement is accurate.

      As the good little lap dogs they are, they started with a desire, to smear dissenters. Then they concocted a means to satisfy that desire, an Index of “disinformation.” Theirs is the widespread, utterly dishonest method of: The ends justifies the means.

  11. I saw these two words and didn’t read further, because I didn’t need to: “Washington Examiner”–a purveyor of BS if there ever was a purveyor of BS.

    1. So says the dependent, parasitic, expert and definitive “purveyor of BS.”

      NUTCHACHACHA, may we dispense with unconstitutional affirmative action and public “assistance” now, or do you still need it?

    2. I saw these two words….
      You can make your own choice….today.
      But what happens when President DeSantis takes control of the levers of power and turns these agencies, on the news sources you use?

      2. Iowan2, are you suggesting that as president DeSantis would censor the media or control what they should say? It seems like you would support government censorship as long as a Republican is in office.

        1. It seems like you would support government censorship as long as a Republican is in office The GDI is Censorship or GDI is not censorship.
          I never said that did I?
          Illiteracy and innumeracy.
          So you tell me if President DeSantis would be censoring. That’s a yes or no answer.

    3. GIgi, they are pretty high on the GDI rankings too. One reason why Turley may be overly critical of the site may be because they are accurate. All one needs to do is just look at what has been going on with Fox News and the revelation that they lied a LOT and took their viewers for gullible chumps.

  12. It’s not an Election Year yet. Just wait the Big MS Cyber-Media Machine will be back online.

    BTW: If you are a Stock Market Bug, buy the Stocks that will ‘pop’ when War is announced.
    I have seen the Helicopters Flying in to be loaded up.
    So far this Month (Feb) [Blount Island Navy Wep Depot – Mayport]

    Feb 14-15: 11 Bell, 6 Apache, 4 Chinook
    Feb 21-22: 10 Bell, 1 Chinook (so far today-noon)
    (~ 7 Squadrons)

    Don’t know how long it takes to get them deployed, but they’re going somewhere.
    Buy Low – Sell High, Its coming!

    1. The munition for defeating Russia et al. is OIL – Bakken OIL, Alaskan OIL, Texas OIL – American OIL and its accompanying pipelines.

      1. I hear you George, however the Powers-to-Be are forcing this War to come to fruition.
        Guess they think ‘Somethings Gotta Give’, like Peace.

        Biden is going to leave Office, with a War. The Successor will be a “Wartime Consigliere” no matter what the Party affiliation.
        Nikki Haley or Ron DeSantis are seemly apt, but it’s going to be whomever the Brookings Institution & Israelis put their influence behind.

        Little early yet, but wont be long.

  14. NPR and PBS are not far behind in the all Republican – BAD, all Democrat – GOOD

  15. Speaking of a blacklist…

    “We are five days away from fundamentally transforming the United States of America.”

  16. First, dont use Microsoft. Plenty of alternatives that are just as user friendly, easy to install and run. Lots of office alternatives too.

    Secondly, a person can be against this proxy war, not want WWIII where millions could die or even nuclear Armageddon ending life on earth as we know it, and NOT be pro-Russian or a Putin Lover.
    It is called common sense.
    And before the Costco Chicken can claim I am suggesting we let Putin take the Ukraine and the rest of the EU (think about that one for a moment), I am not suggesting that in the slightest.
    What I have stated on this blog before, more than once, we need to get the Ukraine and Russia to the peace table, hammer out a truce. Neither side gets everything they want. They both have to compromise. Then, put a DMZ between the two of them.
    Stop the killing. Stop running toward WWIII.

    1. Upstate, great comment, as usual! We all want Russia to lose the war but those of us that have read anything about WWI don’t feel good watching how events are playing out. There is a line between appeasement and warmongering but the left will now allow it because they want to use Ukraine as a political cudgel. I have been a hawk against the Soviets for my entire life, but the left loved the Soviets. The NY Times, adored the Soviets and Ted Kennedy went to Moscow behind Reagan’s back to try to appease them at their most dangerous time. Now that China is the threat they love China and hate Russia. I still hate Russia, but I am smart enough to know who the threat is and it is the CCP.

      I LOVE COSTCO CHICKEN as a name, it is perfect.

      1. HullBobby,
        Thank you!
        Would it be great if the Ukrainians could push the Russia’s back and reclaim all Ukrainian territory?
        Of course.
        But would that be worth it if it cost 100,000 lives on either or both sides? And the cost of civilian lives too when there could be a cease fire and truce?

        This just in: During Office of the Foreign Affairs Commission of the Communist Party of China’s Central Committee Wang Yi’s trip to Moscow, Yi announced,
        “The People’s Republic of China is ready to join forces with Russia to decisively stand up for national interests and promote mutually beneficial cooperation in all areas.”

        I will wait and see what the analysis is, the WH reaction, but that sounds rather concerning.
        Also wait and see if the Doomsday Clock gets closer to Midnight.

        1. Uh, Hullbobby, this isn’t just about Russia trying to take over Ukraine, because if Putin gets away with that, Poland, Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania will be next, so he’ll control access to all of Eastern Europe, plus the Baltic and Black Seas, so he can control commerce by sea. After that, he’ll go further. At some point, he has to be stopped, so the real question is: how far will the majority of the world allow him to go before we are forced to stop him? He’ll eventually come for us, too, if he gets away with it. It’s just like Hitler and the start of WWII–he was allowed to take over the Sudentenland because people in that region spoke German, they thought that would appease him, but he didn’t stop there. Putin will do the same. If China and Russia align, it would be just like Japan and Germany, but there’s doubt that China will do this because they are too dependent upon other countries to purchase their goods. Their economy depends on selling us stuff. This kind of aggression has to be nipped in the bud. Our own freedom is on the line here.

          1. “The Sun Never Sets On The [NUTCHACHACHA] Empire!”

            “The World According To [NUTCHACHACHA].”

            “[NUTCHACHACHA Is] Five Days Away From Fundamentally Transforming The [World].”

            Wait. Let’s ask Putin: Sir, are you coming after NUTCHACHACHA?

          2. Gigi, if you could read you would have seen that I say I hate Russia and I don’t want them to be successful in this war. But your straw man argument doesn’t work because the other nations you mention are in NATO and Article V protects them.

        2. The resolution in Ukraine has always been clear: neutrality, and Russian hegemony over the Donbas and Crimea. The only difference the war has made is that now Kherson and Zaphorizhia are also part of the deal. If Germany, France and the US had insisted that Ukraine implement Minsk, and had ruled out Ukraine joining NATO, there would be no war. In the end, Ukraine’s economy is being destroyed and many of its people are being killed. The risk of escalation will grow. Much of the world will continue to hold the war at arms’ length. And Russia will be ever more tightly held in China’s orbit. And for what? To maintain Kyiv’s control over contested eastern provinces. The Biden administration has committed a world historical blunder. And most of Republican leadership has encouraged it.

    2. @Upstate

      This has been my advice since 1999. Unless you have to for work, DO NOT use Microsoft, and at work, DO NOT use their resources for anything personal. They have always been villains, and you better believe they are about as ethical today as North Korea. Bill Gates was not a genius, he was, and is, an elitist opportunist with unfathomable delusions of grandeur. Don’t use Google stuff either, if you can help it. That leaves Apple and Linux; for the ease of use, go with Apple. If you understand the technical, go with Linux, there are very good distros these days, and there is a reason our national labs run the software on their mission critical servers, and they do – I have installed them myself at times. Please absorb that – our most secretive places do not engage with Microsoft or Google.

      That said, is anyone surprised? Biden is doing exactly jack and **** independently; if ever we had a figurehead, he is it. Not even a lame duck, he is a tool. He was not elected, he was installed. People cry, ‘Ok, then, Obama!’. Alright, so – what is Obama a pert of? It isn’t an American political party. If you think we aren’t now pitted against a regime, you need to wake the eff up. Modern, older liberals most of all. The glory days of living in blissful insularity are over, for the foreseeable future. Sorry to disrupt your comfort, but this is what we are dealing with. It is real, and it isn’t going to just settle down; it will grow and grow unless we actively nip it in the bud. Do you want civil war across the Western world? Do you want WWIII? If not, in America: STOP voting dem. Vote for literally anything else, it does not automatically make you a Conservative Cleetus. That is your ego, your privilege, and your lack of understanding about shared humanity talking, because you are waaaaaay too comfortable in your bubble.

      Additionally, there is no one to one comparison between countries because America is unique in it’s founding governance. Non-dems here are NOT automatically the National Front. There is no blanket comparison, so stop trying to make that case. Stop believing the lie, and if you value anything about your freedom, in the 21st century – STOP voting dem. Period.

      A person recently said she knew better than parents because she has a masters degree. Guess what: both my wife and I have three of those, she additionally has a law degree, my dad was a Phd, and there are five real doctors in my family, and without exception we all oppose those ideas. This is so beyond absurd I don’t know what else to say. Stop. Voting. Dem.

      Older liberals, WAKE UP.

      1. Yes, Microsoft is Evil. I try to avoid them & the rest, Google, Apple & the rest of the Anti-American Trash.

        Note how Larry Ellison/Orcale are staying out of the limelight?

        Also note, it’s far to late, we’ve been in WW3 for some time now. Another Billionaires War, Gates, Soros (Fading), Boso/Amazon/Wapo, Musk, etc..

        *********

        MUST SEE FULL INTERVIEW: Michael Yon Joins Infowars for Epic Exposé of the Globalist Collapse of Society Through Multi-Front Warfare

        1,462 views

        ·

        Feb 22, 2023
        1
        Share
        Download
        The Alex Jones Show
        The Alex Jones Show

        Michael Yon of https://michaelyon.locals.com/ joins The Alex Jones Show in-studio to break down the muli-faceted globalist warfare being used to collapse civilization

        https://banned.video/watch?id=63f68bd385d91c3d2eca642c

        ********

        MASS MURDER: The Real Numbers Out Of Ukraine Are Horrifying

        11,291 views

        ·

        Feb 22, 2023
        11
        Share
        Download
        The American Journal
        The American Journal

        MASS MURDER: The Real Numbers Out Of Ukraine Are Horrifying

        Click Here For Nitric Boost

        banned.video/watch?id=63f66dce85d91c3d2ec0c85b

      2. Yes, Microsoft is Evil. I try to avoid them & the rest, Google, Apple & the rest of the Anti-American Trash.

        Note how Larry Ellison/Orcale are staying out of the limelight?

        Also note, it’s far to late, we’ve been in WW3 for some time now. Another Billionaires War, Gates, Soros (Fading), Boso/Amazon/Wapo, Musk, etc..

        *********

        MUST SEE FULL INTERVIEW: Michael Yon Joins Infowars for Epic Exposé of the Globalist Collapse of Society Through Multi-Front Warfare

        1,462 views

        ·

        Feb 22, 2023
        1
        Share
        Download
        The Alex Jones Show
        The Alex Jones Show

        Michael Yon …….. joins The Alex Jones Show in-studio to break down the muli-faceted globalist warfare being used to collapse civilization

        https://banned.video/watch?id=63f68bd385d91c3d2eca642c

        ********

        MASS MURDER: The Real Numbers Out Of Ukraine Are Horrifying

        11,291 views

        ·

        Feb 22, 2023
        11
        Share
        Download
        The American Journal
        The American Journal

        MASS MURDER: The Real Numbers Out Of Ukraine Are Horrifying

        Click Here For Nitric Boost

        https://banned.video/watch?id=63f66dce85d91c3d2ec0c85b

    3. Can’t speak for the ‘Costco Chicken’, but the Biden/Zelenskiy Dynamic Duo say, after Ukraine, Putin is hell-bent on conquest of Berlin, Paris, London and, after that, it’s just a matter of time before Putin is driving a tank down Pennsylvania Ave. The whole wide world would be his oyster.

      Putin’s mad, unprovoked aggression in Ukraine – out of the clear blue sky, mind you – threatens global freedom, democracy and the American Way. Biden/Zelenskiy are all that stand in his way. Russia is a ‘state sponsor of terrorism’ and the root of all ‘crimes against humanity’. Pure evil.

      Hard to argue with that at the ‘peace table’?

      Imo, it’s a small miracle the conflict has not spilled outside the borders of Ukraine already. The trajectory for catastrophic war seems baked-in inevitable .. . something has got to give.

      *I must say, also, it takes some special sense of ‘global’ entitlement for Sec. Blinken to ‘warn China’, or anyone else, of sending weapons to Ukraine?
      note. as I understand it; US/NATO struggle to provide Ukraine around 60k 155m projectiles per month. .. Russia is averaging around 60k per DAY.

      1. dgsnowden,
        That is a pretty good, and even amusing, summary.
        Thank you for that.
        The consumption rate of our munition stockpile is very concerning. I read a week or two ago, if we were to get into a war with China, say over Taiwan, we would be out of certain precision weapons in a week.

        This just in:
        “For the most part, China has been engaged in providing rhetorical, political, diplomatic support to Russia. But we have information that gives us concern that they are considering providing lethal support to Russia in the war against Ukraine,” Blinken told ABC’s “This Week” program on Sunday, after meeting with China’s top diplomat, Wang Yi, at the Munich Security Conference.

  17. A full court press, you can smell the fear – prog/left fears – something they will soon need become accustomed to since a slight majority, at this point, are beginning to say “Enough”.

Comments are closed.