Site icon JONATHAN TURLEY

Tea Party Congressman Thinks the Unemployed are Lazy

Submitted by Lawrence Rafferty, (rafflaw), Guest Blogger

 

We often read and hear about the Tea Party and its members being in favor of protecting the Constitution, lowering taxes, protecting state’s rights, reducing the size of government, and going back to the ideals of our Founding Fathers.  You can imagine my surprise when I recently read that freshman Texas Congressman, Blake Farenthold, a member of the Tea Party Caucus, at a recent meeting with constituents, claimed that unemployment compensation does not give enough incentive for people to get a job!

“At one point during the session, a man asked about drug testing for “welfare recipients.” Farenthold said that this is an idea worth considering, and then went on to complain that unemployment insurance is too generous. He then compared Americans on unemployment insurance to alcoholics and drug addicts:  FARENTHOLD: Drug testing for recipients of various welfare programs, I really think that’s something that needs to be considered. We’ve gotta, you know, nobody wants to starve anybody. Everybody wants to help folks out. But we’ve got a system where you can stay on unemployment for an awfully long time. And I think we need to create a system of decreasing benefits over time to encourage you to get a job. I think anybody who’s had an alcoholic in their life or somebody with a drug problem, realizes that until things get bad enough there’s no incentive to change. I think that we’re so generous in some of our social problems that people are unwilling to get a job outside in the heat. Rather than get 15 dollars to go get roofing they’d rather get 9 or 10 dollars in benefits. I think drug testing is not an unreasonable requirement to get benefits.”  Think Progress

Does Rep. Farenthold really believe that unemployed Americans want to stay on unemployment compensation?  Does he really believe that being unemployed is akin to being an alcoholic or being addicted to narcotics?  As someone who has been unemployed in his life, the last thing that you want is to be unemployed.  Do all Tea Party members have this disgusting view of their unemployed neighbors?  I am curious as to how many jobs has Rep. Farenthold helped create as a member of the Tea Party Caucus?   If you go to Rep. Farenthold’s congressional website, he lists creating jobs as one of his “issues”.  Unfortunately, the job’s issue is not the first issue on his list.  Let’s take a look at a Tea Party Representative’s idea of what is important to American voters:

Is anyone else surprised that creating jobs was not the number one issue on Rep. Farenthold’s list of issues?  The list actually reads like it was drawn up by Karl Rove or Dick Armey.  From lower taxes to restricting tort verdicts, to making everyone personally responsible; these are talking points straight out of the Right’s political bible.  Could it be that the Tea Party is not an independent group and is really bought and paid for by corporations?  Guardian.com    Someone should ask Rep. Farenthold if American workers just got “lazy” when the recession started in December, 2007 or have they been lazy ever since the Democrats took over the White House?

If the Tea Party Caucus does little or nothing to increase jobs, should American voters consider them lazy?  Maybe we should give Rep. Farenthold and his fellow Tea Party members some incentive to help create good paying jobs here in America.  What do you think?

Respectfully submitted by Lawrence Rafferty, Guest Blogger

Exit mobile version