By Mark Esposito, Guest Blogger
The law regards procreation as a fundamental right. Most religions support the ideal of large families with the Catholic Church banning all but the most fundamental type of birth control. Americans have long recoiled from China’s “One Child” policy to combat population explosion. Given that backdrop how does society deal with such irresponsibility? Do children have to suffer poverty or becoming wards of the state simply because some people can’t suppress their urges or behave irresponsibly? Do conservatives have a point when they argue that welfare benefits based on the number of children to be supported breeds this type of behavior?
The state has no right to order Hatchett or his “Baby Mamas” to stop making babies. Should it in such an extreme case? If not for Hatchett, for the children that he obviously cannot support?
Source: WREG (via Yahoo)
~Mark Esposito, Guest Blogger
